Red Panda Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Really, you're smarter than that skidder. That's rp type logic. Buzzs average is based on 2014, hence what position he rode in 14 is relevant. Watt's average is from 15, hence where he rode in 14 is irrelevant I'd add that if a rider rode here last in 13 their average is not directly comparable Exactly. And he stated that on the bsf on the Coventry thread Ah lowering the tone by dragging me into something that has nothing to do with me.................. As I have said before unless they publish the so called list and the criteria used to meet it then there are going to be continual arguments about it................saying that even if it was published there would be more arguments as to who and who should not be on it................ Hey here is an idea............what about taking a riders combined average over the 2014 and 2015 season and using that to calculate who should be on there whether they rode one season or both....................since so many people are incensed about Buzz not meeting the criteria............... Remember its not Poole who created the rule..............all promoters work to the same rules its just some use them better than others.............. RP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waiheke1 Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Why combine 14 and 15? It should be aligned with the rolling averages, otherwise the concept makes no sense. I agree that in this instance poole are not to blame, I blame the promoters who bafflingly vote in rules which seem to favour poole and no one else. And if buzz is not on list but watt is, then assuming watt is named in poole side, then they haven't really gained. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Panda Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Why combine 14 and 15? It should be aligned with the rolling averages, otherwise the concept makes no sense. I agree that in this instance poole are not to blame, I blame the promoters who bafflingly vote in rules which seem to favour poole and no one else. And if buzz is not on list but watt is, then assuming watt is named in poole side, then they haven't really gained. All teams have the same rules to work to.............they were not designed to favour any team and anyone who thinks that is totally wrong............... RP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Neil Watson has categorically stated, and confirmed when asked they were the heat leaders. Fine if you don't want to believe him. It was also confirmed that we had 7.3(? Ish) left for a second string. I am not disputing what Neil Watson said on here. The point I was attempting to make is that he didn't say that those 3 were heat leaders on the BSPA list, even though by average they will start in Coventry's 3 HL positions. As CVS has been quoted as stating there are/were only 18 riders on the agreed HL list by whatever criteria the BSPA members agreed upon. This is why the likes of King and Andersen and no doubt others MAY not have been classed as heat leaders but might still line-up as a heat leader for their respective teams, subject to how those teams are put together average-wise.. Hope that's polite enough........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy robin Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Why combine 14 and 15? It should be aligned with the rolling averages, otherwise the concept makes no sense. I agree that in this instance poole are not to blame, I blame the promoters who bafflingly vote in rules which seem to favour poole and no one else. And if buzz is not on list but watt is, then assuming watt is named in poole side, then they haven't really gained. Of course they gain if Watt is on the heat leader list(which he shouldn't be) because if Buzz was as well then they couldn't have both riders with Chris & Hans on it already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 (edited) no it isn't but then you called me a tw.t and to go play play with the traffic on another thread. So stop getting on your high horse when you get called something. You dish it out and cry like a big girls blouse if it's the other way. Erm, you called him darling ? Are you really this thick ? If you look back through his previous posts, I'm sure you'll agree that he is. Isn't it time for you to all go back for your medications, and afternoon kips., poor dears Some just don't have a sense of humour on here. Not a surprise though... Edited November 29, 2015 by Starman2006 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Isn't it time for you to all go back for your medications, and afternoon kips., poor dears Some just don't have a sense of humour on here. Not a surprise though... wow what a little freak of a man you are. if its all humour please tell me why you ran to get me banned for calling you a numpty? You call me a tw.t and to play with traffic yet you ran to the mods at being called a numpty. Cant have it both ways 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agrotron Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Grow up the pair of you 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Of course they gain if Watt is on the heat leader list(which he shouldn't be) because if Buzz was as well then they couldn't have both riders with Chris & Hans on it already.I think they mean that originally it was thought Watt was SS and Buzz was HL, so if it was the other way round it wouldn't make a difference as Poole would have the same team. Now if we sign Shamek, that changes things. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poolebolton Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Please can we sign Shamek we need someone for the future. He can be the future Magic even though they are the same age. I love Davey but i'm not convinced with him versus Harris and Cook when we need that 3 points to win the meeting or whatever the occasion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemini Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 I agree that in this instance poole are not to blame, I blame the promoters who bafflingly vote in rules which seem to favour poole and no one else. Just as a matter of interest exactly which Poole assets rode for other teams this season? Also which have been signed for 2016? This may have a bearing on why some promoters are always keen to agree with Matt Ford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INCOGNITO Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Przemyslaw Pawlicki at 6.75 would be classed as a heat leader as would any new or returning rider with an average in excess of 6.00 Holder and North look like the most likely combination but will Holder be at Poole or Britain next season ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 (edited) Just as a matter of interest exactly which Poole assets rode for other teams this season? Also which have been signed for 2016? This may have a bearing on why some promoters are always keen to agree with Matt Ford. Walasek - Leicester??And KK- Coventry Dak/ Watt - Lakeside possibly I know there is talk on Leicester thread of THJ and he belongs to us (if I remember rightly) Edited November 29, 2015 by lisa-colette 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poolebolton Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 I don't think North will ride for us to inconsistent would rather have Kacper but I think Shamek is logical choice. Then 2017 team Magic, Brady, Kyle,Shamek and his brother. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Przemyslaw Pawlicki at 6.75 would be classed as a heat leader as would any new or returning rider with an average in excess of 6.00 Holder and North look like the most likely combination but will Holder be at Poole or Britain next season ? It won't be North and no problem getting Pawlicki as we have only signed one heat leader at the moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Game On Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 It won't be North and no problem getting Pawlicki as we have only signed one heat leader at the moment. I'm fairly sure Andesen is on the heat leader list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy robin Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 I'm fairly sure Andesen is on the heat leader list. He should be!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 I'm fairly sure Andesen is on the heat leader list.Yeah he's the one heatleader we have signed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve0 Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 Przemyslaw Pawlicki at 6.75 would be classed as a heat leader as would any new or returning rider with an average in excess of 6.00 Holder and North look like the most likely combination but will Holder be at Poole or Britain next season ? What? Like Buckowski? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted November 29, 2015 Report Share Posted November 29, 2015 I'm fairly sure Andesen is on the heat leader list. Yes he is the only heat leader we have signed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.