dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 You're correct. He should have been excluded for that!! https://youtu.be/KDpWSEGkXRM?t=1h43m43s There you go, not in "full personal control" as the start guy is revving the bike and the cut-out is not attached as he's seen putting it on second later! thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 Why thank Pearson ? I knew he was breaking the rules plus endangering other riders and staff. Poole don't help themselves at times, Matt needs to say my rider broke the rules and belle vue should be awarded the 2 points and if he did that he would gain a little respect. oh get lost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heathen chemistry Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 when riders have ridden wrongly in heats they should'nt of ,the points scored in heat are removed retrospectively Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 I do not know why some of you are getting your knickers in a twist, over the goggles issue. It should have been up to the start marshal to point this out to the ref, and how the ref did not spot what was going on from his lofty perch is baffling. It's nothing to do with the start marshal. It's NOT his job. Seriously, wonder about this forum. People make things up. Mark Lemon pointed out the lack of goggle to the referee after the heat, the referee should have then excluded Kyle. It's that simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 thank you. THE CUT OUT WAS CLEARLY TIGHT AND IN PLACE BEFORE THE RACE STARTED. CAN YOU READ THIS ? if you cannot we have sponsors you should pay a visitation to.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 Yes we are, but for the 1000th time, its down to the referee and start marshall, how many more times. Clearly these poole hating 's on here will just not have it. ITS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE START MARSHAL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 It's nothing to do with the start marshal. It's NOT his job. Seriously, wonder about this forum. People make things up. Mark Lemon pointed out the lack of goggle to the referee after the heat, the referee should have then excluded Kyle. It's that simple. You are so thick SCB, its down to the referee and start marshall to take action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 THE CUT OUT WAS CLEARLY TIGHT AND IN PLACE BEFORE THE RACE STARTED. CAN YOU READ THIS ? if you cannot we have sponsors you should pay a visitation to.. The rule says he has to have it on and be in control of the bike at the start gate. While he was playing with his goggle he had taken it off then put it back on. The start marshal was in control of the bike not Kyle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 You are so thick SCB, its down to the referee and start marshall to take action. It's not for the start marshall to take action. It isn't in his jurisdiction to take action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 (edited) You are so thick SCB, its down to the referee and start marshall to take action. I'm thick? It is NOTHING to do with the start marshal. 14.12 A START MARSHAL’s role is to assist the Referee to make fair, equal starts by:* ensuring the Start Area, Start Gate, Tapes (of the correct specification) all comply to these Regulations and that spare tapes (also of the correct specification) and Elastic (which may be used if the Starting Gate fails) is available. * bringing Riders to the Tapes in an orderly manner determined by their gate position, ie. a, b, c then d), to the correct position, with the front wheels within 75mm of the tapes, checking that the ignition cut-out lanyard is correctly attached. * signalling to the Referee by walking well clear allowing the Referee to take control. * briefing Riders on the procedures in the event of a Gate failure. During a Heat: * should the Referee show any Stop or Disqualification lights, s/he will immediately show the appropriate flag, whilst remaining at the trackside whilst doing so. * showing the correct flag at the end of the penultimate and final lap of all Heats. Where in there does it mention "tell the referee if the rider is not wearing goggles"? Edited September 29, 2015 by SCB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 (edited) The rule says he has to have it on and be in control of the bike at the start gate. While he was playing with his goggle he had taken it off then put it back on. The start marshal was in control of the bike not Kyle. How many riders play with there goggles at the start, loads, clearly they are not in control either. Stop clutching at straws you sad sad loser. Edited September 29, 2015 by Starman2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 You are so thick SCB, its down to the referee and start marshall to take action.you are the thick one can you not read the rule book! It is solely down to the referee nothing to do with the start marshal. Who has your family brain cell today? Poole haven't cheated nobody is saying that but you are so effing stupid you can't read properly. The referee missed it and people are quite rightly questioning if the points can still be taken off. Obviously being a moron you are quite happy for rules to be broken and results standing then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 Yeh of course it was. You do arf talk some crap... so not crap after all....It was unattached and he was not in personal control. Not during the race agreed - which is why i posted asking for clarification and not making an accusation. Take a chill pill fella..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 (edited) you are the thick one can you not read the rule book! It is solely down to the referee nothing to do with the start marshal. Who has your family brain cell today? Poole haven't cheated nobody is saying that but you are so effing stupid you can't read properly. The referee missed it and people are quite rightly questioning if the points can still be taken off. Obviously being a moron you are quite happy for rules to be broken and results standing then Really im the thick one, so what does that make you and SCB. THE REFEREE MISSED IT THE F--KING START MARSHALL WAS HOLDING THEM .go away, yet another sore sad loser. I told you, BV can have the 2 points. and if we win it fair and square i expect you to be second in the que to congratulate us. Edited September 29, 2015 by Starman2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Game On Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 It's not for the start marshall to take action. It isn't in his jurisdiction to take action. Maybe not but if he sees or knows something that's got the potential to be a health and safety risk, he should of delayed the start and informed the ref. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 So if the start marshall indicated to the referee that all 4 riders were ready to race and the race was started by the referee and finished to a result, what are all the arguments about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPD444 Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 Under number #263 I stated that a heat 16 had been organised for everyone to walk the very last lap round the track to raise money for Darcy. Unfortunately the track manager, who works for the GRA who own the stadium, refused to allow us to do it under health and safety rules at the last minute for reasons we have been unable to fully understand, how walking round an empty track is dangerous is beyond me. So I apologise for misinforming you, and share the disappointment shared by all the fans, Aces and Poole. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 Really im the thick one, so what does that make you and SCB. THE REFEREE MISSED IT THE F--KING START MARSHALL WAS HOLDING THEM .go away, yet another sore sad loser. I told you, BV can have the 2 points. and if we win it fair and square i expect you to be second in the que to congratulate us. HALLELUJAH! Why was that so hard to admit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemini Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 The BV "Fightback" hasn't got me convinced at all. Lord Fraud is a business man. I have a feeling that he instructed the Poole team to ease up on the gas later on in the meeting. He could see that the gate money would have been adversely affected for the 2nd leg, if BV had trailed by 8-10 points. I suspect that the 2nd leg is now just a formality. My thoughts too and the same thing happened at Coventry with two miraculous 5-1's to the Bees so the match was drawn. Probably what Sky wanted as well. ........Star Lady....... The referee obviously hadn't been to Specsavers. Mark Lemon has tweeted that he queried the lack of goggles with the ref before heat 12 and the ref said he didn't notice. What the hell was he watching? Who was the referee? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted September 29, 2015 Report Share Posted September 29, 2015 Maybe not but if he sees or knows something that's got the potential to be a health and safety risk, he should of delayed the start and informed the ref. Yet again i reiterate it isn't part of his job description to do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.