peterborough daz Posted May 19, 2016 Report Share Posted May 19, 2016 Could Panthers bring Holub in for Stokes after his 4 matches ? Technically yes or Konopka or any other 3 pointer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LagutaRacingFan Posted May 19, 2016 Report Share Posted May 19, 2016 I was informed no 7,s will move up into the teams top five if their average demands it but replacing an original no 7 can only be done with another 3.00 NL rider irrespective of his latest GSA. What absolute nonsense; how on earth does that make sense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panthers89 Posted May 19, 2016 Report Share Posted May 19, 2016 I was informed no 7,s will move up into the teams top five if their average demands it but replacing an original no 7 can only be done with another 3.00 NL rider irrespective of his latest GSA. Is ridiculous, Tom has averaged 5.00 on merit some are struggling to average a point but we have to use them to replace Perry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterborough daz Posted May 19, 2016 Report Share Posted May 19, 2016 Is ridiculous, Tom has averaged 5.00 on merit some are struggling to average a point but we have to use them to replace Perry? Rider Replacement it is then, however he does have a guest average next to his name on the bspa website Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted May 19, 2016 Report Share Posted May 19, 2016 Is ridiculous, Tom has averaged 5.00 on merit some are struggling to average a point but we have to use them to replace Perry? No I meant if a team re declares and drops its original no 7 he can only be replaced by another 3.00 irrespective of his current GSA. Whilst Perry is out and in the 1-5 it's RR with all riders below and one above his GSA taking his rides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted May 19, 2016 Report Share Posted May 19, 2016 Rider Replacement it is then, however he does have a guest average next to his name on the bspa website So if we hadn't made changes and kept Porsing and MPT with the new averages in place we would have had to drop Perry or one of the top 5 to be dropped to put Perry into the top 5 to allow bringing in a 3 pointer at NO;7. this is farcical , you couldn't make it up. Only the B.S.P.A. would do something like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWC Posted May 19, 2016 Report Share Posted May 19, 2016 More Like the BSPA didn't expect the 3pointers to average more than that! Remember 2006 when Boxall and Armstrong were 'forced' by the BSPA to move into the team from reserve when they stated at the start of the Season that both 6 and 7 would stay at reserve all season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panthers89 Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 Think the best thing we can do, if Perry is out when he drops back to reserve, put stokes at 7 and bring in Holub 3.00, and fire him up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 (edited) To be fair Perry,s been one of our stars this year and full credit to him. He has been one of the best no 7's in the PL so far Edited May 20, 2016 by bigcatdiary 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panthers89 Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 Without doubt our rider of the season so far 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadders Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 More Like the BSPA didn't expect the 3pointers to average more than that! Remember 2006 when Boxall and Armstrong were 'forced' by the BSPA to move into the team from reserve when they stated at the start of the Season that both 6 and 7 would stay at reserve all season. I remember it well. Boxall was averaging close to 8.00 when they changed the rules, Armstrong around 7.00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben91 Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 More Like the BSPA didn't expect the 3pointers to average more than that! Remember 2006 when Boxall and Armstrong were 'forced' by the BSPA to move into the team from reserve when they stated at the start of the Season that both 6 and 7 would stay at reserve all season. When that happened it was also because Rye and Mildenhall had declared graded reserves in the main body of their teams who moved down as Boxall and Armstrong moved up (Jamie Courtney and James Brundle I believe) so the justification was that there would still be two Brits at reserve for both teams. As Peterborough have two eligible number seven riders in their line-up now in Perry and Stokes, perhaps the lower averaged of the two has to occupy the number seven slot? Even if so, that should have been made clear at the start of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 When that happened it was also because Rye and Mildenhall had declared graded reserves in the main body of their teams who moved down as Boxall and Armstrong moved up (Jamie Courtney and James Brundle I believe) so the justification was that there would still be two Brits at reserve for both teams. As Peterborough have two eligible number seven riders in their line-up now in Perry and Stokes, perhaps the lower averaged of the two has to occupy the number seven slot? Even if so, that should have been made clear at the start of the season. I wouldn't argue the rights and wrongs on this , my argument is how did it come to this conclusion as no one person seems to know the answer. Have the B.S.P.A. changed the ruling or is this a hidden rule or is there any legality in it at all. Mr Chapman and Mr Godfrey and the rest of your management team I am politely asking for one of you to just clarify the situation . I hope this does not fall on deaf ears as i'm quite sure a lot of speedway supporters all over the country will be interested in the conclusion on this subject. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparkafag Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 (edited) It doesn’t seem that farcical that a British rider signed on a 3.00 average in accordance with regulations to promote junior riders can only be replaced by a British rider signed on a 3.00 average in accordance with regulations to promote junior riders, it just seems pretty logical to be honest. Edited May 20, 2016 by The Mockingjay 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 It doesn’t seem that farcical that a British rider signed on a 3.00 average in accordance with regulations to promote junior riders can only be replaced by a British rider signed on a 3.00 average in accordance with regulations to promote junior riders, it just seems pretty logical to be honest. It's easy for anybody to draw there own conclusions but they are not rules that's why I am asking for clarification from a member of the B.S.P.A. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_Jones Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 (edited) It doesn’t seem that farcical that a British rider signed on a 3.00 average in accordance with regulations to promote junior riders can only be replaced by a British rider signed on a 3.00 average in accordance with regulations to promote junior riders, it just seems pretty logical to be honest. It would be logical if that's what the regulations said but they don't, which is the farcical part. Edited May 20, 2016 by Alan Jones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noodles Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 Peterborough 'T.Balfe Construction' Panthers: 1. Craig Cook 10.35 2. R/R for Tom Perry 5.58 3. Ulrich Ostergaard © 8.13 4. Emil Grondal 5.35 5. Kenneth Hansen (g) 7.42 6. Simon Lambert 4.63 7. Tom Stokes 3.00 Hawkins thinks rider replacement for Perry makes us weaker 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted May 20, 2016 Report Share Posted May 20, 2016 Is that your team Sunday? Looking forward to the beating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterborough daz Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 Is that your team Sunday? Looking forward to the beating. Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans fan Posted May 21, 2016 Report Share Posted May 21, 2016 whats the latest about jakobsen , doesn't seem to be a lot of info about the extent of his injury Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.