TheScotsman Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 Can't have a meeting without Paco. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screm Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 Nico Covati has qualified for the SEC Challenge after today's meeting in Austria, sadly Paco Castagna failed to qualify in the same meeting. Thoughts from Chris Louis. http://www.ipswichwitches.co/story/no-more-home-defeats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 Can't have a meeting without Paco.[/quote He has been rubbish in some meetings and okay in a couple, but it seems he is already a club legend As for louis, I'm sure he said the same thing this time last season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 We would be without Nico & Paco tonight if we had a meeting as they are both at SEC qualifier in Austria. And Kerr is at Swindon. With suitable guests could have had a Witches win 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Thumb Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 (edited) And Kerr is at Swindon. With suitable guests could have had a Witches winWould we be allowed guests for Nico & Paco? Can't remember if BSPA recognise the SEC as a sanctioned competition. Edit. Just read that Morten was riding in a Danish Championship qualifier today as well, so would have been missing 4 riders. Edited May 5, 2016 by Tom Thumb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 You mean there's a rulebook for such things!? Wink 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EIS002 Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 It's the Rathbone chapter wink wink Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New era Panthers Posted May 5, 2016 Report Share Posted May 5, 2016 It's the Rathbone chapter wink wink Wait till you get to the last page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 Wait till you get to the last page.looks like you need a rewrite of that last page since the BSPA MC have ripped out the proceeding chapter!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 (edited) Well I think it's great that the panthers promotion are trying to give their fans a winning team, but obviously the committee doesn't Edited May 6, 2016 by baldyman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Blue Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 I think it would be great if our promotion could give us a winning team! And as a side issue I'm totally gutted for Peterborough (hmm, not really) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScotsman Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 What if Coventry dropped Danny King and Ippo let him move to Peterborough and signed Cookie in his place along with whatever change that was necessary to fit within the points limit as long as Paco keeps his place? Sorted!! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 Do it do it do it 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siggytastic Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 Coventry Friday night track? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 Well I think it's great that the panthers promotion are trying to give their fans a winning team, but obviously the committee doesn't The issue is simple that a rider cannot double up for two teams that ride on the same night like Peterborough and Belle Vue. Imagine if it was allowed and other clubs did it. Every week how many guests would there be? Nothing against Cook wanting to do premier league but he needs to pick a track that doesnt ride Fridays 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 Like us 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScotsman Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 Exactly. I would probably go every week if he was on board. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted May 6, 2016 Report Share Posted May 6, 2016 Let's start a petition, cook likes those 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reviresco Posted May 7, 2016 Report Share Posted May 7, 2016 Let's start a petition, cook likes those I've got my "We Want Shanes" petition in first Baldy - well, mine is the only signature, so I guess I will have to cross out "We" and replace it with "I" - doesn't have the same impact, does it and sounds a bit homo erotic, so maybe I'll bin the idea of a petition and just get my spray can out and graffiti the air fence in time for the Rye Mouse Rickets Cup match. Fans interactive involvement and all that. Reading the Star t'other day, it sounded like the current 1 - 7 will not be changed for foreseeable future - or does that mean that four of them will be changed in the seeable future? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted May 7, 2016 Report Share Posted May 7, 2016 (edited) No changes. That's the correct decision. Edited May 7, 2016 by baldyman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.