Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

King's Lynn V Coventry Wed 19th August


Recommended Posts

Not sure how it came across on TV but for a sky match I thought it was a good crowd, good atmosphere, programmes sold out, plenty of sponsors there and plenty of controversy. Goes to show you get a top of the table clash people will go! There is still Life in British Speedway ☺

To be honest, it didn't come across great on TV. The track was very gate and go with races often won from the first bend unless a mistake was made. Gate 1 had a big advantage.

I have seen better meetings this year.

 

Kelvin Tatum's view this morning on last nights meeting. Have to say I agree with him:

 

@Kelvin_Tatum: I think King's Lynn were fortunate in some respects last night - Coventry could have pushed them all the way but Heat 12 changed that.

The ref made a rod for his own back; no need to exclude James Sarjeant whatsoever.

But King's Lynn powered to victory in the end inspired by a wonderful showing from Niels-Kristian Iversen.

Edited by mdmc82
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's an interesting slow mo video going around from behind Sarj in heat 12. In it, you can see that Sarj has not moved until the tapes start going up. However, it is also clear that he has started moving when the tapes are still at wheel height for the other 3 riders who are still motionless. Therefore, it would appear that he has gained a small advantage over the others. Maybe the ref had access to this angle / speed. I will try and post it on here but don't hold your breath, I'm not very technical!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's an interesting slow mo video going around from behind Sarj in heat 12. In it, you can see that Sarj has not moved until the tapes start going up. However, it is also clear that he has started moving when the tapes are still at wheel height for the other 3 riders who are still motionless. Therefore, it would appear that he has gained a small advantage over the others. Maybe the ref had access to this angle / speed. I will try and post it on here but don't hold your breath, I'm not very technical!

Fine, so it's an unsatisfactory start and all four back then. As he hadnt moved enough to touch the imaginary tapes and as he had moved the race was stopped before Garrity crashed into Morris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only trouble with that as I said before is that the ref wouldn't have been watching Sarj, he'd have been watching the start line. Therefore Garrity was the cause of the race being stopped. The race would probably have run its full 4 laps without that and James may or may not have been excluded then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only trouble with that as I said before is that the ref wouldn't have been watching Sarj, he'd have been watching the start line. Therefore Garrity was the cause of the race being stopped. The race would probably have run its full 4 laps without that and James may or may not have been excluded then.

In which case, he was watching Sarj and thought it was fine. So he has to exclude Garrity. He has to do one or the other. He can't do both. If a rider jumps the start when all 4 are at the tapes but then someone falls off on the 1st bend then all 4 back is called, the fact someone falls off doesn't matter as the race has technically been stopped by then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's an interesting slow mo video going around from behind Sarj in heat 12. In it, you can see that Sarj has not moved until the tapes start going up. However, it is also clear that he has started moving when the tapes are still at wheel height for the other 3 riders who are still motionless. Therefore, it would appear that he has gained a small advantage over the others. Maybe the ref had access to this angle / speed. I will try and post it on here but don't hold your breath, I'm not very technical!

 

If he hasn't moved before the tapes start going up there is no issue.

 

What the other riders do or don't do is irrelevant.. the whole idea of making a good start is to gain an advantage over your opponents! As long as you do so by moving AFTER the tapes start going up, which you say he did, then nothing is wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In which case, he was watching Sarj and thought it was fine. So he has to exclude Garrity. He has to do one or the other. He can't do both. If a rider jumps the start when all 4 are at the tapes but then someone falls off on the 1st bend then all 4 back is called, the fact someone falls off doesn't matter as the race has technically been stopped by then

Whether or not he has that remit I don't know. But to me it's clear, Garrity caused the stoppage and was rightly excluded. The ref then either noticed himself or it was brought to his attention that Sarj may have jumped and because he had already been penalised the ref decided to exclude him too. For what it's worth I feel a Re run with 3 riders with sarj off 15m would have been fair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are sky allowed to interview the ref after the meeting?

Can team managers come out after the meeting and tell the media what R Allan said to them regarding the double exclusion in heat 12?

Will refs speak to fans after the meeting to clear situations up?

Is there a referees report per match,where a ref has to say what actions he takes during heats?

 

 

Like a lot of other people im completely confused what Ronnie Allan did in heat 12.if any of the above can happen it would clear the situation up straight away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Rob VDS last night's referee? :lol:

 

I'm not even convinced Garrity's exclusion was clear cut, I saw Nevill the Devil at Plymouth go faster around the first 2 bends on his push bike than Morris did in heat 12. He left a gap, Garrity took it.

I think it was clear cut,the incident happened right in front of us and there was clearly contact.Why Garrity makes rash decisions like that I don't know.If he had bided his time he had another 4 laps to get Morris in which I'm sure he would have done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was clear cut,the incident happened right in front of us and there was clearly contact.Why Garrity makes rash decisions like that I don't know.If he had bided his time he had another 4 laps to get Morris in which I'm sure he would have done.

That is something he has to learn, no points when you're excluded or hurt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's an interesting slow mo video going around from behind Sarj in heat 12. In it, you can see that Sarj has not moved until the tapes start going up. However, it is also clear that he has started moving when the tapes are still at wheel height for the other 3 riders who are still motionless. Therefore, it would appear that he has gained a small advantage over the others. Maybe the ref had access to this angle / speed. I will try and post it on here but don't hold your breath, I'm not very technical!

I don't know if this link will work or not but I'll give it a go. https://www.facebook.com/keith.andrews.7503/videos/o.165342870196384/383069855237651/?type=2&theater

 

To be fair James would have been watching the right hand side of the tapes and they do seem to go up unevenly, hence the other riders not moving at the same time James did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Rob VDS last night's referee? :lol:

I'm not even convinced Garrity's exclusion was clear cut, I saw Nevill the Devil at Plymouth go faster around the first 2 bends on his push bike than Morris did in heat 12. He left a gap, Garrity took it.

I agree - I would have pulled all 4 back. I know he has a bit of a reputation but I thought he was hard done by being excluded

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this link will work or not but I'll give it a go. https://www.facebook.com/keith.andrews.7503/videos/o.165342870196384/383069855237651/?type=2&theater

 

To be fair James would have been watching the right hand side of the tapes and they do seem to go up unevenly, hence the other riders not moving at the same time James did.

Yes fair point, I think it's more how the 15m rider is set up rather than James doing anything wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy