Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Exeter - A Glimmer Of Hope?


Recommended Posts

you do know that saying such things on here is akin to saying them in public and may render you liable

an extraordinary thing to say

I am sure the BSF Mod will adjudicate on this matter? :oops::unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's true, it's not slander or libel!

Technically, I'm not sure that's true. I think slander and libel is would the statement you made cause a reasonable person to think negatively of the person the comment is aimed at. Not is it a lie. So for example, you couldn't sue someone for libel/slander if they called you gay as these days being gay is not seen as a negative thing - but it could still be a lie.

 

I say this, but I believe it al very complicated and that's why lawyers love it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's true, it's not slander or libel!

the money will have some kind of executor who will have to give permission for its use so its unlikely anything illegal has occured

as SCB has ponted out - you can't just say what you want in public

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the money will have some kind of executor who will have to give permission for its use so its unlikely anything illegal has occured

as SCB has ponted out - you can't just say what you want in public

With Freedom of Speech you also need responsibility.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the money will have some kind of executor who will have to give permission for its use so its unlikely anything illegal has occured

as SCB has ponted out - you can't just say what you want in public

Let's hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i believe the sum was around 250k and although that's a handsome sum it doesn't go far on legal fees

Very true, but as I recall, we were led to believe it was a 'Mr Trump crusade' and I thought it was his money that was being used for the venture, especially as he was supposed to be a 'big shot', 'well heeled' businessman. It's always easy to spend someone else's money!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true, but as I recall, we were led to believe it was a 'Mr Trump crusade' and I thought it was his money that was being used for the venture, especially as he was supposed to be a 'big shot', 'well heeled' businessman. It's always easy to spend someone else's money!

to be fair it probably was used for the venture but ran out - legal fees are high regardless of whose money it is. I'm not quite sure what you are trying to get at but without evidence I'd leave it there if i were you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to be fair it probably was used for the venture but ran out - legal fees are high regardless of whose money it is. I'm not quite sure what you are trying to get at but without evidence I'd leave it there if i were you

Well you are not me....and by the sound of you, I am glad I am not you mate! This is a forum where people discuss things, I am merely discussing and what I said was how it came over to me. And I am sure it is how it came over to others. Perhaps you should stick to trying to resurrect Cradley Heath, which is another 'can of worms'!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you are not me....and by the sound of you, I am glad I am not you mate! This is a forum where people discuss things, I am merely discussing and what I said was how it came over to me. And I am sure it is how it came over to others. Perhaps you should stick to trying to resurrect Cradley Heath, which is another 'can of worms'!

You really are a k**b at times Ray.

 

ch 958 is trying help you out by reminding you of the laws regarding defamation of character, and at the same time you are assuming, without facts, he is a supporter of Cradley Heath, which he is decidedly not.

Not bad, 2 own goals in one post.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really are a k**b at times Ray.

 

ch 958 is trying help you out by reminding you of the laws regarding defamation of character, and at the same time you are assuming, without facts, he is a supporter of Cradley Heath, which he is decidedly not.

Not bad, 2 own goals in one post.

Well as Gustix said, let's leave it to the mods! Let's hope the guys behind the resurrection of Exeter, can do it without any funding from Mr Hill's estate. I wish them all the best!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as Gustix said, let's leave it to the mods! Let's hope the guys behind the resurrection of Exeter, can do it without any funding from Mr Hill's estate. I wish them all the best!

Without hard evidence it might be a case of leaving it to the lawyers who are rather more expensive than the remaining mods. Ironic really given these reckless allegations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy