Pirate Nick Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 As Workington have now ruled out Campton and Wethers, could they now recall one of their own assets (don't know any from memory) from a loan to another club? Likewise if Manzares is refused at Ipswich could/would they recall Lanham to fill the gap? I think Manzares is ok as he was top 4 (won?) a state championship. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grachan Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 AN hotel? An hotel is incorrect. It's "a hotel". Â It's one of those things that has crept into modern speak, and has become common. But it is not correct. Â File alongside "should of". 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCookster Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) An hotel is incorrect. It's "a hotel". Â It's one of those things that has crept into modern speak, and has become common. But it is not correct. Â File alongside "should of". Actually, historically "an hotel" is the correct British English form, but over time "a hotel" has become not only accepted, but also the more prevalent. So both "an hotel" and "a hotel" are grammatically correct these days, but with "a hotel" being the the more commonplace in modern parlance. Edited February 4, 2015 by TheCookster 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Â That`ll be Holder who is now back racing at Poole. Â bit harsh on holder. He chose to limit his schedule for a year to recover from serious injuries and crump rode nearly 20yrs in the uk and Sullivan over 10. Id say thats pretty loyal. So they're loyal unless you choose to ignore a year or 5 to suit your argument Brilliant. they were not loyal, they chose not to ride here. Loyal would be always riding here and putting us first, like hell did they/do they. Â Even Darcy Ward got a ban in 2009 for riding for Torun rather than Kings Lynn! Â They're "loyal" (as in they ride here) because the Poles and Swedes don't bloody want them when they start out. Â Holder is back here because it suit him. I've no problem with that. He owes us nothing, we owe him nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyretrax Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 An hotel is incorrect. It's "a hotel". Â It's one of those things that has crept into modern speak, and has become common. But it is not correct. Â File alongside "should of". When I was at school, which wasn't yesterday, we were taught it was "an hotel" so how does that make it modern? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparkafag Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Is Skidmore screwed even with a 6.99 average? I have seen reference to dual nationality but can’t remember him racing NL/coming in on a 3.00 average (though they might be wrong/not even criteria) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 When I was at school, which wasn't yesterday, we were taught it was "an hotel" so how does that make it modern? Surely it's either "a hotel" or "an 'otel"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Skid Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) Look on the positives, the Clubs have saved a fortune on air fairs. PMSL And the Promoters thought they could act like Delboy, whenever they liked, big mistake, just wait till HMRC take an interest,employing and paying illegal workers, sh** and fan come to mind. Edited February 4, 2015 by Lord Skid 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Surely it's either "a hotel" or "an 'otel"? That appears to be The Oxford Dictionary definition of the use of a or an. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyretrax Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) Surely it's either "a hotel" or "an 'otel"? You're 'aving a laugh. Edited February 4, 2015 by tyretrax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
workyboy Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 interesting Rusty Harrison, he's available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willowman Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Rusty Harrison, he's available. Not according to SCB 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sotonian Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 An hotel is incorrect. It's "a hotel". Â It's one of those things that has crept into modern speak, and has become common. But it is not correct. Â File alongside "should of". And, my pate hate, gotten instead of got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The SAINT Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) Is Skidmore screwed even with a 6.99 average? I have seen reference to dual nationality but can’t remember him racing NL/coming in on a 3.00 average (though they might be wrong/not even criteria) marrying a sheffield girl , so not an issue with him Edited February 4, 2015 by The SAINT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) So riders with question marks against them (under a 7 ave) However may qualify other ways? Wethers Sedgeman Henry Manzares Skidmore Douglas Poole Proctor Campton T Kurtz Smith J Holder Davies  Qualify other way Heeps Wells Harrison Edited February 4, 2015 by 2ndbendbeerhut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Blobby Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 marrying a sheffield girl , so not an issue with him  Marrying someone from over here means nothing now though! Wethers for example married to a Scottish girl and has a family now but still not allowed to ride Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Najjer Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 So riders with question marks against them (under a 7 ave) However may qualify other ways? Wethers Sedgeman Harrison Henry Manzares Skidmore Douglas Poole Proctor Campton T Kurtz  Qualify other way Heeps Wells  Alot on that list will be okay, but you've missed off Jack Holder, Kozza Smith, Alex Davies and Ryan Fisher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 (edited) I've updated the list. Maybe some more in EL? But Fisher and Davies are over 7. And Holder is new application Edited February 4, 2015 by 2ndbendbeerhut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 Not according to SCB Apparently Harrison doesn't have a problem - got that form someone who would know. Â marrying a sheffield girl , so not an issue with him Doesn't mean a thing. Needs more than marriage. Â Â Alot on that list will be okay, but you've missed off Jack Holder, Kozza Smith, Alex Davies and Ryan Fisher. Fisher averaged over 7 in the PL last year (and over 4 in the EL) Â I've updated the list. Maybe some more in EL? But Fisher and Davies are over 7. And Holder is new application Davies didn't average anything last season so doesn't qualify based on average. He has to qualify based on his state final performances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
workyboy Posted February 4, 2015 Report Share Posted February 4, 2015 interesting Rusty Harrison, he's available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.