Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Bspa Meeting With Ukv&i?


Recommended Posts

 

As with anything formulated by speedway, I doubt anyone has thought that far... Why stop with Texas - there's another 48 states that could have championships too. :rolleyes:

 

I'm sure the BSPA would like the criteria to be as liberal as possible though, and up until now it seems the authorities have obliged.

Exactly my point and also why I earlier mentioned Tasmania is Oz.

If there hasnt been a solo championship there the same could apply if MA want to assist 4 Aussies who currently may not qualify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sedgmen qualifies as he finished top 4 in victorian titles

And this will start happening again if that is the requirements for a visa.

Fair point on Sedgmen - he should be okay then.

 

And Ryan douglas was in the top 4 in the queensland titles

My mistake - I thought he had been injured all winter and I read he had been on crutches but in fact came 3rd in his state final.

 

Jack Holder on the other hand failed to do so.

Edited by Najjer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was invented by accident. In the late 19th Century a German scientist, Justus Liebig, discovered brewer's yeast could be concentrated, bottled and eaten. In 1902 the Marmite Food Company was founded in Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, where the raw material was readily available from the town's brewers.

Well, we stopped the German's (all of them), coming over twice, but that stuff has still found its way here,,, you just can't win :-(

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair point on Sedgmen - he should be okay then.

 

My mistake - I thought he had been injured all winter and I read he had been on crutches but in fact came 3rd in his state final.

 

Jack Holder on the other hand failed to do so.

Taylor Poole could potentially be exempt due to the injury clause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main problem is none of the riders know exactly what the current requirements are. The general consensus was that the requirements were top 4 in state championship or qualifying for your national final.

Why don't they? It took me 2 minutes on the BSPA website to find it. You'd also hope the promotion would also know if a rider qualifies too.

Taylor Poole could potentially be exempt due to the injury clause.

Rubbish - did his average ever go above 7 last year at any point? The answer is no. Edited by Najjer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, we stopped the German's (all of them), coming over twice, but that stuff has still found its way here,,, you just can't win :-(

Do you think the German's caused all that trouble, just to sell 'marmite' ???,,,

they'd have been better off using it as a weapon, thing is tho, it's so bloody expensive :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't they? It took me 2 minutes on the BSPA website to find it. You'd also hope the promotion would also know if a rider qualifies too.

Rubbish - did his average ever go above 7 last year at any point? The answer is no.

you would think so but the same clubs were bring riders in on a 5 when they clearly should have been a 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't they? It took me 2 minutes on the BSPA website to find it. You'd also hope the promotion would also know if a rider qualifies too.

Rubbish - did his average ever go above 7 last year at any point? The answer is no.

the GBE info is easy to find on the BSPA site but is stated as relating to 2009 and is inconsistent against the 2014 regs.

 

IF you do go by them the injury caveat doesnt state the rider had to be above 7 at any time.

It simply states exemption where injury has prevented the rider.

Returning from or suffering a new injury isnt specified so either COULD apply.

For Poole infact both could apply as he broke a leg both before and after his Sheff stint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the GBE info is easy to find on the BSPA site but is stated as relating to 2009 and is inconsistent against the 2014 regs.

 

IF you do go by them the injury caveat doesnt state the rider had to be above 7 at any time.

It simply states exemption where injury has prevented the rider.

Returning from or suffering a new injury isnt specified so either COULD apply.

For Poole infact both could apply as he broke a leg both before and after his Sheff stint.

Why should it apply? Injury didn't prevent him from achieving a 7.00 average, he wasnt ever near it. Another rider who has ridden over here for two seasons and failed to achieve the required rate.

you would think so but the same clubs were bring riders in on a 5 when they clearly should have been a 7

That's a different arguement altogether - as its already been stated at no point over the past few years should any work permit rider have come over here on a 5.00.

 

I believe it's also been said the requirements haven't changed for a number of years, hence the 2009 date.

Edited by Najjer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how things pan out as riders like Poole, Campton and Manzares still had current visa's with one or more years left. So aslong as they met the requirements when the visa's were issued they should be ok. If they were forced to apply for new ones then that will cause issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see how things pan out as riders like Poole, Campton and Manzares still had current visa's with one or more years left. So aslong as they met the requirements when the visa's were issued they should be ok. If they were forced to apply for new ones then that will cause issues.

Troy Batchelor has already said he had a 2 year visa which has effectively been ripped up and he has to reapply. The others will be exactly the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Troy Batchelor has already said he had a 2 year visa which has effectively been ripped up and he has to reapply. The others will be exactly the same.

originally that was thought to be the case but the riders were later infomed that it was the sponsorship certificates had been cancelled and the visa's were currently suspended.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hearing that Plymouth have accepted there may be issues with Holder's visa and have put in a request for first call on the top 4 Tasmanian qualifiers. If acceptable, they will be renamed the Tazmanian Devils!! :D

 

 

 

I'll get my coat.......... :t:


originally that was thought to be the case but the riders were later infomed that it was the sponsorship certificates had been cancelled and the visa's were currently suspended.

Not according to Colin Pratt from Friday's workshops!! New CoS's have been agreed and Swindon have re-submitted Batchelor's visa application straight away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm hearing that Plymouth have accepted there may be issues with Holder's visa and have put in a request for first call on the top 4 Tasmanian qualifiers. If acceptable, they will be renamed the Tazmanian Devils!! :D

 

 

 

I'll get my coat.......... :t:

 

Not according to Colin Pratt from Friday's workshops!! New CoS's have been agreed and Swindon have re-submitted Batchelor's visa application straight away.

but are they applying for a new visa or are they applying to have the current one reinstated?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, I forgot about his stints with Ipswich - admittedly he broke his arm in one of those seasons right at the start of the season, but that's now 4 seasons where he hasn't reached the required standard.

but nowhere does it state the average has to be attained if the other criteria are met.

If the injury prevented him from competing in his stare championship the exemption COULD apply there.

I am not claiming this is right or fair just pointing out that the wording is so ambiguous and wooly you can take it to mean almost anything to suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy