Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Constancy


customhouseregular

Recommended Posts

and as we approach the coveted number one spot:

 

 

7 Rye House 63 seasons (1934-2015)

aggregate for all three tracks (the original track was on site of go-cart circuit, but as it was within the curtilage of the same site I have aggregated them). There are some additional seasons when track was used for training, but no meetings were staged.

 

6 Ipswich 63 seasons (1950-2015)

including an unbroken run since 1969

 

5 Swindon 67 seasons (1949-2015)

67 consecutive seasons of league racing

 

4 Poole 68 seasons (1948-2015)

unbroken since opening, with one year of non-league speedway (1957)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and as we approach the coveted number one spot:

 

 

7 Rye House 63 seasons (1934-2015)

aggregate for all three tracks (the original track was on site of go-cart circuit, but as it was within the curtilage of the same site I have aggregated them). There are some additional seasons when track was used for training, but no meetings were staged.

 

6 Ipswich 63 seasons (1950-2015)

including an unbroken run since 1969

 

5 Swindon 67 seasons (1949-2015)

67 consecutive seasons of league racing

 

4 Poole 68 seasons (1948-2015)

unbroken since opening, with one year of non-league speedway (1957)

I'm all a quiver..................................................

 

But I know who is Number One. :party: :party: :party:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number one - no surprise - but I think 2 & 3 were less obvious.

 

 

3 Sheffield 69 seasons (1929-2015)

only two blank years since 1960

 

2 Eastbourne 73 seasons (1929-2015)

have included 1940 which is not in the records, but a programme recently appeared on e-bay. There may have been meetings in 1953 but there are no verified details. Seasons where the track was used for training only are not included

 

1 Coventry 76 seasons (1928-2015)

includes unlicensed meetings in 1936; has staged league speedway for 68 seasons in a row

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have put Coventry and Eastbourne at nos. 1 & 2. That's why I mentioned them earlier. Forgot about Sheffield though. There was a meeting at Eastbourne in 1953, The Championship of Sussex, won by Ron Barrett. It was the size of the crowd for this meeting that encouraged Charlie Dugard to revive Eastbourne in 1954. So, does that make 74 seasons?

 

Anyway, thanks so much for all the research and presenting this Arnie. It's been fascinating, interesting and a very worthwhile project. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
15 minutes ago, Richard Weston said:

Hi,  Just found this thread. So going back to the 2015 entries re Eastbourne and 1940. Not only was there a programme but there were reports of the meeting in the local paper at the time. I know this because the Archive feature in the 2017 programme featured 1940 towards the end of the season. So Eastbourne definitely ran one meeting that year before the war hotted up.

Several tracks opened for business in 1940. There were even plans for a league. But then on May 10 Germany invaded France (followed shortly by Dunkirk) and activity reduced sharply. West Ham and California both shut up shop in May.

Aside from Belle Vue who ran a full season, Rye House (11 mtgs), Oxford (8) and Glasgow White City (6) also staged more than a couple of meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, adonis said:

Speedways biggest problem is the law in the UK ,  Stadiums are prime targets for developers because ,they usually stand in a fair bit of ground with buildings on them , anyone with enough money and time can use the way British law is , to build anything anywhere , stadiums are not usually on Green Belt or even Brown belt  so that's the first major hurdle out of the way , next will be objectors (least of a developers worries ) and then (working on behalf of the objectors )  local councils , developers know they can keep appealing time after time and eventually the council won't be able to defend ,  and providing the legal costs can be factored into the final income   ,there  is not a piece of land anywhere that a developer couldn't build on 

Without planning laws it would be even easier for developers to buy up stadiums and redevelop as residential or commercial property. The fundamental problem is the basic laws of economics. Speedway (and many other leisure activities) simply can't compete with the financial returns available for other land uses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy