Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Kent 2015


hackneyrocket

Recommended Posts

For me, that's the main problem with the points limit, they are forcing riders out, in an ideal world, riders would come into the national league on a 3 point average, work there way up until they were picked up by a premier league club and move on

 

It's not happening, rider averages will only go up with such a small limit, and then they are unable to ride as they can't be fit into sides

 

David may or may not wish to ride for kent, but the option is not there for him

Doesn't mean 'Magic' shan't still be riding NL... I've heard he will be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't mean 'Magic' shan't still be riding NL... I've heard he will be

 

 

Good luck to him, I hope he does, any clues as to where he may end up

 

 

Eastbourne or rye house would be logical

 

I am ALWAYS wrong but my guess is David Mason will be back at Rye House. :approve:

 

With apologies to Hector Austin for not seeking his permission to return to the Kent Kings thread! :oops:

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

I am ALWAYS wrong but my guess is David Mason will be back at Rye House. :approve:

 

With apologies to Hector Austin for not seeking his permission to return to the Kent Kings thread! :oops:

You enjoy ya man :t:

 

I go for Easty if you say Rye :wink:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What puzzles me about the "modern day" speedway structure is that under the averages system a good scoring rider like David Mason loses a team slot and is replaced by one with a lower average. No wonder speedway is in decline...so many stupid rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What puzzles me about the "modern day" speedway structure is that under the averages system a good scoring rider like David Mason loses a team slot and is replaced by one with a lower average. No wonder speedway is in decline...so many stupid rules.

Well there's been team equalisation/rider control for as long as I can recall. Which won't be as long as you clearly gustix!

If every team could just be as strong as they wanted/could afford the competition in the leagues would be very one sided and crowds would be badly affected.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there's been team equalisation/rider control for as long as I can recall. Which won't be as long as you clearly gustix!

If every team could just be as strong as they wanted/could afford the competition in the leagues would be very one sided and crowds would be badly affected.

A fair point I suppose under the modern conditions as speedway struggles for survival. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mason is likely to be back at Rye House.

 

There is, and rightly should be, limited space for more experienced riders in the NL. They benefit their team mates yes but one per team is plenty.

 

Mogridge, Verge, Kirby etc aren't being forced out of contention in the Kings side because of the points limit, they are being forced out because 1) the Kings have gone top heavy and 2) they announced the bulk of their side before they knew what the points limit would be.

 

That being said they have made a good start to team building and with the right three riders in the last three slots they can challenge for honours without a doubt.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kent aren't really top heavy.. Ben has one of the higher averages but every team does need a number one and considering Morley's been with the Kings from the beginning it would've been wrong IMO to consider anyone else for that role.

The other signings pre-AGM were James Shanes, a rider nailed on to increase his average; Danny Ayres, improving so much he's also certain to improve his scoring; and Aaron Baseby, who does have perhaps an average about the level he's likely to continue scoring at but then again what's wrong with that. No-one would've called that quartet 'top heavy' until the decision to set a 36 points maximum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kent aren't really top heavy.. Ben has one of the higher averages but every team does need a number one and considering Morley's been with the Kings from the beginning it would've been wrong IMO to consider anyone else for that role.

The other signings pre-AGM were James Shanes, a rider nailed on to increase his average; Danny Ayres, improving so much he's also certain to improve his scoring; and Aaron Baseby, who does have perhaps an average about the level he's likely to continue scoring at but then again what's wrong with that. No-one would've called that quartet 'top heavy' until the decision to set a 36 points maximum.

 

Considering they have used almost three quarters of their team building total on the top four they are definitely top heavy. No-one may have called it top heavy before the AGM but no-one knew the points limit before the AGM so perhaps it was a little premature for the Kings to sign over half their side.

 

Morley should be a top dog in the league this year. Adam Ellis is the only rider signed by any team so far who could be classed as head and shoulders above him on track. Shanes and Ayres are highly likely to improve too. You'd also imagine Aaron Baseby can at least maintain his starting figure considering there will be more three point riders around, which is a good thing for the division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Kent team will seem top heavy in comparison to others because three 3-pointers will be something a number of other teams shall have to go with too. I can't really see what the alternative was? Remember three out of the top four scorers from last year have had to be jettisoned; are you suggesting more needed to go to in order to have a balanced side..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the Kent team will seem top heavy in comparison to others because three 3-pointers will be something a number of other teams shall have to go with too. I can't really see what the alternative was? Remember three out of the top four scorers from last year have had to be jettisoned; are you suggesting more needed to go to in order to have a balanced side..?

Agree and getting the RIGHT 3 pointers in is the key.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy