Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

More Tinkering At The Agm


Steve0

Recommended Posts

Well, some interesting negativity here, based on the fact that the BSPA say that they were responding to fans' requests. I for one think they have done a pretty good job and to me it seems to have gone a little better without Bob Dugard spoiling some of the ideas!

Agree, the only reservation I have at the moment is the limit of 2 riders over 7 if this is the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lets be honest, most of the changes are to situations that should never have existed in the first place.....

 

sorting the tac rule, not using guests from already qualified teams in the play offs, replacing injured riders for the play offs, all should have had clear 'common sense' rules in place already..

 

the biggest disappointment for me is the bowing down to the GP riders, 'ride when you want lads' is now the message,...

 

'don't bother attending an EL meeting in a GP week fans' could also be the message..... :cry:

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the biggest issues that needed to be addressed was the ability to replace the fourth ride for the second fast track reserve. Although Coventry benefited (to a point) from it last year (although Sarge was flying at the end of the season), Poole did massively as there was such a huge gulf between their top rider (Newman) and their second rider (take your pick).

 

The idea of the draft was that if you had a top 'A' rider, it was offset by the fact you had a weaker 'B' rider. Teams like Leicester and Wolves (with two similar level riders) suffered whilst Poole and Coventry benefited.

 

All fast track reserve rides should be protected. To stop any sharp practice, if they go through the tapes, miss the 2 minutes etc, they should have to go off 15 metres and not be replaced by their partner reserve.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree, the only reservation I have at the moment is the limit of 2 riders over 7 if this is the case.

 

Agreed, let teams build to the 34pt linit however they see fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing to really bring back the lost or new fans & great news if you're a rider with a high 6 point average like amazingly Dakota North as they will be in high demand for a 3rd heat leader slot.

 

Best option is to sign a 3 point rider & then the top draft riders from 2014 will get even more rides as well as the usual practice of replacing the 2nd draft rider, which should've been a new rule for definate.

 

Would rather Swindon had gone to Premier League as an 8 team league is pants.

Some people are so easily pleased! What have they done to address the lack of value for money? As I said in the original post they are only tinkering when they should have been a bit more ruthless - we will still see lots of guests, the team strength in real terms hasn't really increased (as there are a glut of second string riders on incorrect averages after last season) and they still have two fast track reserves. As Skidder1 pointed out, they will probably want to charge more too - probably to fund the return of yellow/black helmet covers :rolleyes:

There is NOTHING in the BSPA announcement to tempt me back. Looks like I will be going to one less meeting next season having only attended one meeting last season after 20+ years of never missing a meeting except when on holiday!!

Spot on & a great post.

Edited by Crazy robin
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Constructive criticism is one thing, but all this negativity is way over the top.....

 

 

When I started work many years ago, this wise man, who taught me so much, said to me, Son! this world is made up of two sorts of people. One, people who only see problems, and two, people who only see results. Now which group do you belong to???? How very true he was.............

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 2-point increase and stronger reserves - wait for the price increases!!!!!!! :mad:

 

Actually the 2 point team building limit would allow all but one team to retain their 2014 1-5 - assumingd all riders were wanting/able to return?!

didnt the EL want to reduce prices last year?? They didnt due to PL pressure alledgedly.

So surely last years excess income will offset any rise in costs this year! wink

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy