Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Edinburgh V Somerset (plpo Final - 2nd Leg) 25/10/14 @7.00pm


Recommended Posts

Explain how then? Why should the ref award the race on the second lap in what is the title decider? Ok Pontus was in the wrong but he should have been made to pay not the whole team. If it had been re run with 3 riders is that not fair? Is this not supposed to be a fair sport?

how would that be fair to Edinburgh?? Its cheating.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Explain how then? Why should the ref award the race on the second lap in what is the title decider? Ok Pontus was in the wrong but he should have been made to pay not the whole team. If it had been re run with 3 riders is that not fair? Is this not supposed to be a fair sport?

But he didn't he waited until they had completed the second lap and as per at his discretion rightly awarded the race as he probably seen in his eyes a rider staying down in the hope of a re-run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two poor guests when it mattered,the rebels management got that wrong and it cost them dearly
Rebels management got it right based on form, if the riders don't turn up you have had it. Three points more over the two legs from our No1 guests would have sealed the deal. Summers should be especially ashamed he only beat Fox all night. No complaints though just galling that it has now happened twice to us in three years. On the plus side two trophies in the cabinet again , second in the table when most experts predicted us to struggle to get in the top six and also finished the season with the top team average.

Well done all the riders and management at the OTA on another great season.[/quote

 

I take it you were both at both legs.... I think not !!!

 

As both guests gave there all and did not let themselves or Somerset down in anyway

 

Comments from people who go by what they read on updates and on here donr always tell it exactly

How it was and how hard riders gave everything...

 

Pontus did make a wrong decision in heat 15 to leave his bike on the track, but it was probably a heat of the moment thing as tension was running high and after the meeting he did apologise.. But we all know it is wrong...

 

Something else which is totally wrong in this sport is on many occasions I have seen riders being excluded from meetings for throwing 1 punch... So how a rider gets away with throwing 3 and connecting with them to a rider who is sat on the track Il never know...

 

There is no ill feeling on the result as both teams gave there all and it was pure entertainment from heat 1 to heat 30... The atmosphere at both stadiums was electric and credit to all the fans from both clubs for making it so

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's call it gamesmanship.

 

Aspirin saw the season running away and tried a soccer dive hoping for another go for his team mate. Ref allowed him time to clear the track which he failed to do until the bikes were on the 3rd lap and heading his way. He then managed to sprint to the center green. Ref realized the scam and awarded the race.

 

If he put the red lights on earlier this would not have allowed Pointless to have the time to clear,he was not under the fence or his machine.Most refs allow a little time to see if the track clears just like Spud in heat 5. Aspirin chose not to leave when clearly he could.

 

The ref had a very good night throughout and completed his stellar evening with the correct call in the most important heat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brummie - you are probably the only one on the whole thread who thinks you should reward cheating with another bite at the cherry.

 

In my book you should reward the team that was on the receiving end of the cheats.

 

I hope Asprin was fined heavily - I have heard that fines are not announced in case it encourages fans to have a whip round.

 

I wouldn't like to see him riding for any of my teams in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brummie - you are probably the only one on the whole thread who thinks you should reward cheating with another bite at the cherry.

 

In my book you should reward the team that was on the receiving end of the cheats.

 

I hope Asprin was fined heavily - I have heard that fines are not announced in case it encourages fans to have a whip round.

 

I wouldn't like to see him riding for any of my teams in the future.

Edinburgh & Glasgow have you got any more ? .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

it was so obviously pre-meditated would be difficult to argue that point. maybe the ref had already been alerted to the possibility?

Very dangerous and totally out of order comment imo, implies outrageous actions with no proof or back up what so ever , you got the decision, now shut up.

Brummie - you are probably the only one on the whole thread who thinks you should reward cheating with another bite at the cherry.

 

In my book you should reward the team that was on the receiving end of the cheats.

 

I hope Asprin was fined heavily - I have heard that fines are not announced in case it encourages fans to have a whip round.

 

I wouldn't like to see him riding for any of my teams in the future.

I seriously cannot believe what I am reading here.. If your promotion were to sign him I guarantee you would support him after his first big score . Are you illiterate or do you have a problem spelling his name

Edited by Cliffeboy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's call it gamesmanship.

Aspirin saw the season running away and tried a soccer dive hoping for another go for his team mate. Ref allowed him time to clear the track which he failed to do until the bikes were on the 3rd lap and heading his way. He then managed to sprint to the center green. Ref realized the scam and awarded the race.

If he put the red lights on earlier this would not have allowed Pointless to have the time to clear,he was not under the fence or his machine.Most refs allow a little time to see if the track clears just like Spud in heat 5. Aspirin chose not to leave when clearly he could.

The ref had a very good night throughout and completed his stellar evening with the correct call in the most important heat.

Well in a football dive what happens? The single player gets the reciprications not the whole team. The referee doesn't just award the result to the other team. Same in any sport. A 5-1 won it for the Monarchs but the ref gave it to them. Neither team got the result fairly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15.5.2 If the Referee stops a Race and the leading Rider has completed a minimum of 2 laps of the Heat, then the Referee has the sole discretion to order a re-run or award the Heat based upon the Rider’s positions when the Heat was caused to be stopped, with the disqualified Rider being awarded no points and Riders behind in the order being advanced one place.

 

As long as race-leader Cook had completed two laps before the stoppage, the ref has the discretion to award the race.

 

All the best

Rob

 

 

Have to be fair to both teams, don't you? Even if it is a run off?

 

Firstly is was not a run off, it was ht 15 which is subject to the rulebook.

 

The above previous post by ls fully explains the situation, namely Craig Cook had completed two laps before Michael Breckon stopped the race because of Aspgren failing to clear the track.

 

As this has been pointed out several times, you are either deliberately trolling, or have insufficient mental capacity to comprehend the facts or you are in catatonic shock after Birmingham City's 8 - 0 horsing at home by Bournemouth at St Andrew's yesterday :P

 

Edited by cyclone
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have had the benefit of ballsy ref decisions in 2 final heats this year,so I would cut Brummie some slack.

Last nights was a no doubter.

 

No complaint from the rebs on 3rd bend who accepted it with class.

 

Don't think it was pretty meditated just a desperate act facing defeat and frustration having gone so close.

 

 

Let's leave it there.

 

Somerset organization would not stoop to that

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sorry Gazc I think you got the spelling wrong but I've fixed it for you.

Aye Peterborough is really difficult to mistake for Glasgow you would need to go through the initial ritual to support the famous Glasgow Tigers currently 2nd best team in Scotland but it is only a temporary blip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly is was not a run off, it was ht 15 which is subject to the rulebook.

 

The above previous post by ls fully explains the situation, namely Craig Cook had completed two laps before Michael Breckon stopped the race because of Aspgren failing to clear the track.

 

As this has been pointed out several times, you are either deliberately trolling, or have insufficient mental capacity to comprehend the facts or you are in catatonic shock after Birmingham City's 8 - 0 horsing at home by Bournemouth at St Andrew's yesterday :P

 

And you my dear sir cannot read properly. Notice the lack of 'heat' and '15' so no I haven't said its a run off. I said it as a way of being fair to both teams. A run off between two riders from the teams. Also another way being a re run where Pontus gets excluded and fined but Morris who is innocent along with the four other Rebel riders still get a chance to win the trophy. I think I have a right to make these statments as thats two times this season the Monarchs have been handed the victory via a referee decision. I have no problem in Edinburgh winning no qualms at all just the mannerism in which it happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edinburgh have been the stand out team this season and have deservedly won a clean sweep of team trophies .

Bar the Fours of course. You will never guess who won! :party: Only the seond best team in 2014.

 

Oops. That will teach me to read and digest first before engaging my keyboard. Sorry Paulco, read straight past the 'team' bit. Scrub the above.

Edited by Willowman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two times - nice to hear it.

 

I also seem to have in my head a picture of Adam Ellis sitting it out in the LC Final at Ippo!!

That was awarded as a 5-1 to the Monarchs as well - probably happened same bend / same lap as yesterday.

But hey it was only heat 12 so is that better?

 

So the refs must love us.

 

Or playing possum is becoming more of a regular occurrence nowadays.

If so then the refs have to stamp it out and what better way than by awarding the race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy