stevebrum Posted May 22, 2015 Report Share Posted May 22, 2015 You and you sad cronies would love that wouldn't you And you and you're blinkered cronies are happy to let official decisions go unpunished. Not that I am surprised of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted May 22, 2015 Report Share Posted May 22, 2015 Is that written by a 10 yr old,,? Yep It's written by someone who isn't grown up enough to apologise for calling someone a liar when it was revealed that person was finally right. Says all you need to know about him. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted May 22, 2015 Report Share Posted May 22, 2015 (edited) Nutty? I'd say someone who is nutty who consistently posts on a discussion regarding an FIM statement, that it then transpires on numerous occasions they haven't even read. Ward wasn't actually 100% eligible to ride at the time, him riding came with a risk that if he was found guilty his pts could be deducted. His teams would have been aware of this but still proceeded to track him anyway. As for Armstrong, it has been claimed that it would be unfair on fans to change the results.. I used him as an example because it is a far bigger sport with far more fans and far more historical meaning.. but it didn't stop them changing the result. So, yes, it is a perfect rebuttal of the point raised.. not my problem if you are unable to understand that. So why are his pts being removed in Sweden? Only to effect his personal average/grade for 2015 - not affecting his club's 2014 position. Edited May 22, 2015 by Skidder1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 Only to effect his personal average/grade for 2015 - not affecting his club's 2014 position. Rubbish. Either his pts are removed or they are not. If his pts are removed which the FIM have ruled they should be, the result of the match changes, its very simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kester Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 It's written by someone who isn't grown up enough to apologise for calling someone a liar when it was revealed that person was finally right. Says all you need to know about him. You're assuming the person in question has enough brain cells to realise they're not right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdmc82 Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 From 1st June, Holder is back as a heat leader & Watt drops to a second string. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecoombdog Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 Time and time again this forum amazes me with the anti anything Poole comments! I have no time for them at all with their blatant cheating at times but the way some people dedicate so much time of their lives posting negative suff is pathetic! Some of the mumps on here need to get a life! I hope Ward comes back and has learnt his lesson at last because anyone who says speedway is better off without him is f**king brain dead. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 Time and time again this forum amazes me with the anti anything Poole comments! I have no time for them at all with their blatant cheating at times but the way some people dedicate so much time of their lives posting negative suff is pathetic! Some of the mumps on here need to get a life! I hope Ward comes back and has learnt his lesson at last because anyone who says speedway is better off without him is f**king brain dead. Time and again this forum amazes me with people living in cloud cuckoo dreaming up posts that don't exist. Who has said speedway is 'better off without Ward'? Even the most ardent Poole fans agreed he was deserving of a ban for his transgression. As for anti-Poole, no poster on this forum has made the ruling the FIM has. Perhaps they are anti-Poole? The debate is regarding the interpretation of the FIM ruling and its effects on speedway in the UK. It's a very valid debate, given this is a speedway forum. Both sides have put forward their argument and in the main it has been kept quite civil. Finally, you 'get a life' comments are again ill-thought out as there are posters who post the opposite side of the debate, as is their right.. yet you only aim your 'get a life' comments at one group. I'm pretty sure most, if not all, the posters on this forum have 'a life' regardless of the content or quantity of their posts. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecoombdog Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 Time and again this forum amazes me with people living in cloud cuckoo dreaming up posts that don't exist. Who has said speedway is 'better off without Ward'? Even the most ardent Poole fans agreed he was deserving of a ban for his transgression. As for anti-Poole, no poster on this forum has made the ruling the FIM has. Perhaps they are anti-Poole? The debate is regarding the interpretation of the FIM ruling and its effects on speedway in the UK. It's a very valid debate, given this is a speedway forum. Both sides have put forward their argument and in the main it has been kept quite civil. Finally, you 'get a life' comments are again ill-thought out as there are posters who post the opposite side of the debate, as is their right.. yet you only aim your 'get a life' comments at one group. I'm pretty sure most, if not all, the posters on this forum have 'a life' regardless of the content or quantity of their posts. All we have to do is wait for the next Poole controversy to kick off and then I will multi quote the same people posting the same stuff and will be proved right. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouch Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 No it's not a Poole controversy it's a speedway controversy that we comment on and quite right to. The fact that the majority of problems involve Poole should tell you something. I'm not and never will be anti Poole. I am and always will be anti cheating and I'll comment on it whoever is involved. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 All we have to do is wait for the next Poole controversy to kick off and then I will multi quote the same people posting the same stuff and will be proved right. What are you going to prove, that there are people discussing a 'controversy' in speedway on a speedway forum? Well done! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 Time and again this forum amazes me with people living in cloud cuckoo dreaming up posts that don't exist. Who has said speedway is 'better off without Ward'? Even the most ardent Poole fans agreed he was deserving of a ban for his transgression. As for anti-Poole, no poster on this forum has made the ruling the FIM has. Perhaps they are anti-Poole? The debate is regarding the interpretation of the FIM ruling and its effects on speedway in the UK. It's a very valid debate, given this is a speedway forum. Both sides have put forward their argument and in the main it has been kept quite civil. Finally, you 'get a life' comments are again ill-thought out as there are posters who post the opposite side of the debate, as is their right.. yet you only aim your 'get a life' comments at one group. I'm pretty sure most, if not all, the posters on this forum have 'a life' regardless of the content or quantity of their posts. The FIM statement makes no mention of Poole!! nor Piraterna or Torun for that matter!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 (edited) It must be very hot in Portugal at the moment for BWitcher to be spending so much time indoors on his laptop!! A bit sad really. Edited May 23, 2015 by Skidder1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouch Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 The problem is some people get hung up on thick or awkward people not agree on a point that isn't difficult to understand. It doesn't bother me that people are stupid. I said everything that needs saying on this subject earlier on. To me it's amusing to see folk struggle to get it but if they ever wanted help in understanding things I would be more than willing to help. Trouble is, for a lot on here ignorance is bliss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz01 Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 They are docking his points in Sweden are they not? That shows the same should happen in the UK. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 Darcy should his points removed so he doesnt financially benefit but unfair if you remove the point from Poole as we could of had a facilty and at the time he was legitimately allowed to ride. The bspa have obviously this line as his other clubs have had his points and their respective league points deducted although it may not have changed anything in their respective league positions 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noggin Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 There has been a decision by the FIM that affects Wards points scored, thus affecting the finishing positions of the EL, which determine PO picks, no one knows how this would affect the outcome, I don't believe KL should be awarded the title, since that's for winning the PO's not topping the league, what we do need is a statement from the BSPA to show the FIM directive has been implemented and how it affects last seasons result. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lino wolf Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 It must be very hot in Portugal at the moment for BWitcher to be spending so much time indoors on his laptop!! A bit sad really. Why would he have to be indoors ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunRobin Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 Why would he have to be indoors ?? Perhaps Skidder has not heard about wi-fi! That just goes to show that everything he says is pants, just like his user name! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted May 23, 2015 Report Share Posted May 23, 2015 (edited) How rude and immature!!! If he's outside in the sun and using wifi for all his long posts, that's even sadder!! They are docking his points in Sweden are they not? That shows the same should happen in the UK. Not from his team they're not - just from his scores which affect his team building average/grade, so he can't be included in the Piraterna squad, under their current rules, when he returns from his ban. We don't yet know what adjustment, if any, the BSPA/SCB will make to Darcy's average when he completes his ban.? Edited May 23, 2015 by Skidder1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.