Grachan Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 (edited) On the face of it it maybe seemed a good idea. Once a match gets to heat 10, the result can be called if the meeting is cancelled. Unfortunately it seems this has caused no end of problems. Last night's match at Lakeside was a classic case. There was also controversy over Belle Vue v Poole last year, and Swindon have also had some matches where the significance of heat 10 has played it's part. And I'm sure there are plenty of other cases too. The problem is, people are playing for it. If last night's track was too dangerous after heat 10, then it must have been too dangerous before that too. Which would mean that either riders lives were put at risk prior to heat 10 or the track was suitable to continue to the end. A rain-off should be a rain-off at the exact point the track becomes unfit. Heat 10 should have nothing to do with it. The only was to do this is for a result to only be called if it has already been mathematically won. And only a referee should be able to call a match off once it has started. Surely? Edited September 2, 2014 by grachan 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trees Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 From a fan's point of view I'd rather it was heat 12 because we only get 2/3 of the meeting at 10 which feels a little bit of a rip off but of course from the promoter's pofv if they can get a result from a started meeting it suits their cash flow. So maybe it is a necessary evil. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IainB Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointsmeanplayoffs Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 I think Trees has it nailed. It's heat 10 for a reason and that is it gives the cash strapped promoters the best chance of getting some cash in. Ht 10 is OK with me, but over a 2 leg match, something like cricket's Duckworth-Lewis scoring method needs to be bought it to make it fair on the home team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz01 Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 In Sweden it heat 8 isn't it! I don't think the problem is which heat constitutes a result because the situation could happen which ever heat it is but the process of abandoning the meeting. Surely it should be the referee and his decision alone after hearing what both sides have to say. What annoyed me more than anything was the track was in far better shape after heat 10 than heat 7 so there was no reason for it not to continue, we actually seen some decent stuff in a couple of those heats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldace Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 I think Trees has it nailed. It's heat 10 for a reason and that is it gives the cash strapped promoters the best chance of getting some cash in. Ht 10 is OK with me, but over a 2 leg match, something like cricket's Duckworth-Lewis scoring method needs to be bought it to make it fair on the home team. Dont you get it? Why are the promoters cash strapped? It could be because not enough people are attending the matches, the faithful are getting fed up and deserting the sport. Now on on earth does continually trying to short change your custom help with a longer term cash flow problem. The answer is it doesn't, it merely compounds it 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adder Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 As I have posted before, no result should stand if there is still a chance of the result changing had the meeting continued.. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 Yes, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Lady Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 From a fan's point of view I'd rather it was heat 12 because we only get 2/3 of the meeting at 10 which feels a little bit of a rip off but of course from the promoter's pofv if they can get a result from a started meeting it suits their cash flow. So maybe it is a necessary evil. I fail to see where it's a necessary evil. Speedway went for decades with no result until Heat 12. Teams had a reasonable chance to pull back a deficit and fans saw a reasonable percentage of a meeting. Where does fairness to fans come in? Oops silly me Dont you get it? Why are the promoters cash strapped? It could be because not enough people are attending the matches, the faithful are getting fed up and deserting the sport. Now on on earth does continually trying to short change your custom help with a longer term cash flow problem. The answer is it doesn't, it merely compounds it Precisely. It alienates the fans on the terraces, cos they feel short changed. Anyone watching on TV will think twice before getting out of their armchair and paying to watch 2/3 of a meeting, especially if any rain is forecast within 50 miles. Speedway is not cheap any more and value for money is very important to people nowadays. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 What happens in the KO Cup , ok i know it's just us in the PL that still has that . But what if a team loses the first leg away by 10 points , and is 8 points up by heat 10 in the 2nd leg when the track becomes dangerous . Is that just bad luck ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointsmeanplayoffs Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 Dont you get it? Why are the promoters cash strapped? It could be because not enough people are attending the matches, the faithful are getting fed up and deserting the sport. Now on on earth does continually trying to short change your custom help with a longer term cash flow problem. The answer is it doesn't, it merely compounds it Yes I do get it. If you think that rain offs and the heat 10 rule are the main reason why the sport is dying then YOU don't get it. It's merely symptomatic of a sport in trouble and NOT the cause. How many meetings are honestly affected like the ones last night? We had BV last season, a couple involving Swindon this, and last night. Not bad for a weather dependent sport in country with an inconsistent at best climate. Bigger problems IMO are blatant rule breaking regarding team building, poorly prepared tracks even in good conditions, poor promoting, poor 'theatre' on race nights, SOME mercenary riders, the increasing importance of engine tuners and a perception of over pricing. That's what destroying the sport we love. Get those sorted and punters won't mind the odd weather affected meeting. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthur cross Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 By all means have any agreed cut-off mark for when a meeting becomes "official" whether that's heat-8, heat-10 or heat-12 ... speedway's such a weather-dependent sport that some sort of cut-off is a necessary evil and the vast majority of fans understand that. Where any concept of "necessary evil" to help clubs' cash flow falls apart is that when a British meeting is abandoned after heat-10, there seems to be no attempt by any club to give just a little bit back to its fans' cash flow to reflect the fact they've paid full price for what turned out to be only two-thirds of the action. Instead, the overwhelming attitude from the clubs (and the authorities around them) is that because this truncated meeting is now officially in the record books, there's no need at all to offer anything back to the fans because those fans saw everything that involved getting that meeting into the record books. After the last few years of credit-crunch economics turning so many more of the public into value-hunters in any of their spending, such an attitude from the clubs might as well belong to the dinosaur world. In any business (not just a sports team) where mostly the same loyal customers are coming along to pay for the same type of product around 20 times a year, surely any business with any sort of customer-friendly perspective would make at least a modest effort to make those customers feel they were at least slightly included in any cash flow implications of a truncated product. So, for example, it shouldn't be until heat-12 that the fans get no rebate for their limited amount of entertainment with their rain-off tickets entitling them to £1 off in the future if the result's been called after heat-11 or £2 off in the future if the result's been called after heat-10. While the fans in such an example still haven't had as much value-for-money as they would have had during fair weather, at least they go home feeling their wallets have been included during the abandonment process rather than going home feeling ripped off. Trouble is, far too many of speedway's decision-makers appear to have long forgotten what it's like being a fan deciding whether to spend hard-earned money in a dodgy-weather situation, either in the hours leading up to a meeting or while reflecting immediately after attending a truncated one. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 Last night there were 4 riders at the tapes happy to go out for heat 11. So whoever decided to call this off was NOT one the rider out there "risking their lives for our entertainment". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 In Poland they call it off earlier and award the rest of the heats as 3 alls. The indifferent weather we get these days and the ridiculous state we get into year after year trying to fit meeting after meeting in a few weeks means that getting a result has to be the aim. If we didn't allow a meeting to be called off to get a result there would be little chance of fulfilling its fixture list which to me is worse and farcical. It seems that in Sweden and Poland they accept that call offs are part and parcel of the sport, here we expect only good weather and perfect 15 heats. Time to wake up. It would be perfect if all meetings got to heat 15 regardless. Whatever the decision the fans would just have something to moan about! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigcatdiary Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 I must be honest I am in the track is either fit for racing or it isn't bracket. I don't give a monkeys where they decide to accept a result, after 10,12 or whatever but the bottom line if the tracks too dangerous to race on, its unfit, if that's after heat 9 then it gets called off after 9 heats. Supporters are the ones getting shafted here and it's happening more and more, as for the a TV spectacle it made the sport look amateurish and a complete shambles and as others have said it will be driving fans away rather than encouraging them to attend. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agrotron Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 Yes its a load of bollocks just look at the farce last night, Speedway is a joke of a sport now even more so than it used to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 As posted on the Lakeside v Poole thread: The Speedway Control Bureau rule states: 15.11 After Heat 10 in an official Team fixture, only the Team that is losing may request a track inspection, or seek abandonment of the Meeting. So it was the Belle Vue call last season and should have been Swindon's decision 2 weeks ago. It should also have been up to Poole last night!! Maybe they all need to recheck the rules - referees, riders, managers, promoters and Sky!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 As posted on the Lakeside v Poole thread: The Speedway Control Bureau rule states: 15.11 After Heat 10 in an official Team fixture, only the Team that is losing may request a track inspection, or seek abandonment of the Meeting. So it was the Belle Vue call last season and should have been Swindon's decision 2 weeks ago. It should also have been up to Poole last night!! Maybe they all need to recheck the rules - referees, riders, managers, promoters and Sky!!! Middlo clearly doesn't know the rules then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Lady Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 Trouble is, far too many of speedway's decision-makers appear to have long forgotten what it's like being a fan deciding whether to spend hard-earned money in a dodgy-weather situation, either in the hours leading up to a meeting or while reflecting immediately after attending a truncated one. And it is now far too easy to not go to a meeting and instead get your "fix" on TV. True you might not get to see "your" team every week but after a couple of weeks the habit is broken. Result one more fan lost to the terraces. I've done it (for many different reasons) and to be honest haven't missed live speedway in the slightest. I look forward to my away trips but that's because they are now part of a mini break and not so weather dependent. If there were no Sky or Bet365 would I still go - if I'm honest I really don't know. As posted on the Lakeside v Poole thread: The Speedway Control Bureau rule states: 15.11 After Heat 10 in an official Team fixture, only the Team that is losing may request a track inspection, or seek abandonment of the Meeting. So it was the Belle Vue call last season and should have been Swindon's decision 2 weeks ago. It should also have been up to Poole last night!! Maybe they all need to recheck the rules - referees, riders, managers, promoters and Sky!!! It would appear that it's really only a problem if TV is involved! Clearly last year pressure was put on Belle Vue and last night pressure was put on both teams. I've said for years that when rider safety is an issue the decision should be made by secret rider ballot. Not difficult for a rider to put a cross on a piece of paper against yes or no, and to keep Sky happy they could have a count like in the General Election. That way the people that really matter, the ones putting their lives on the line, make the decision. No one knows who voted yes or no, unless it's unanimous or they choose to tell us and it avoids all the name calling, pressure and interference from Sky etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 As posted on the Lakeside v Poole thread: The Speedway Control Bureau rule states: 15.11 After Heat 10 in an official Team fixture, only the Team that is losing may request a track inspection, or seek abandonment of the Meeting. So it was the Belle Vue call last season and should have been Swindon's decision 2 weeks ago. It should also have been up to Poole last night!! Maybe they all need to recheck the rules - referees, riders, managers, promoters and Sky!!! isnt there a supplementry to this rule covering televised meetings and the role of the meeting coordinator??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.