SCB Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 SCB you talk a load of rubbish sorry Another one with great debating skills. Seriously, explain where. Because so far both you and starman think I talk rubbish but have not explained where. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xmas Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Get out more and smell the roses pal, On a Saturday night you sit on a forum telling everyone you are right about everything Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 SCB you talk a load of rubbish sorry No, he speaks the English language. He has quoted the definition of the word drunk in the English language. Now forgive me, but when determining the meaning of a word, I, like SCB, would side with dictionaries over yourself and Starman. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stratton Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 I presume he was that DRUNK he had to be carried into the stadium?. It does not matter how much alcohol he had in his body he shouldn't of had any he made a humane mistake and he is now paying the cost. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sommelier Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 To be honest I wouldn't know, though apart from Danno a few years ago Ward is the only one to fail a test. Completely agree, all riders should be tested before the GP`s. Ronnie Correy was banned, all he got was 14 days! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screm Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Get out more and smell the roses pal, On a Saturday night you sit on a forum telling everyone you are right about everything Lol And your sitting replying to him, I generally agree with the majority SCB`s posts on here, at least he has the debating skills to back up his argument, we await to see if you can do the same. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 And your sitting replying to him, I generally agree with the majority SCB`s posts on here, at least he has the debating skills to back up his argument, we await to see if you can do the same. Rightly or wrongly must of the people on this forum understand the word debate. SCB will always put across his case and usually back it up with facts to support his argument. If you disagree with people on here you need to back up why you disagree, its called an intellectual debate. The trouble is there are certain people on here who we all know who cant do this. If they dont agree with you then you are either a clown, a poole hater or worse. They dont back up anything but instead just have a dig at the poster and in the case of Sidney actually start getting very irate and getting abusive, tends to happen when they have lost the argument sadly. Looks like xmas could be another one of these posters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldace Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 To be drunk is to be in a state where alchohol impairs your decision making and thinking process. There are of course degrees of being drunk but falling over puking up isn't the only definition. Even 1 pint affects these processes to a very small degree, not enough that you would be considered unfit to drive but affected all the same. So yes. After 1 pint you are, in a tiny way drunk, after 15 pints you will be very drunk with different degrees for each pint in between. When you start talking sh!t that can be a sign you are either very drunk or Starman 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruno Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 They love both the Poole fans, and i myself support both riders and both have a longterm future at the club, this forum is not an overwhelming feeling of any club in my book.The people i speak to want Ward involved in speedway, he is brilliant at it i do UNDERSTAND though he has to toe the line and knuckle down not many more chances left for him.I know you dislike Middleditch but for me his loyalty to Darcy has been brilliant,i can identify with that i have three real close friends who i would support to the hilt and vice versa friendship means everything. I went on Thursday to see him alone,not a great evening for him but he will be a force no doubt about that. like you Sidney ive got 3 close friends in fact im off up the pub with 2 of them in a bit to celebrate me taking redundancy and I would back them to the hilt in anything.however, if they were getting in to scrapes especially involving drink and then driving I wouldn't take the soft approach with them. like you I admire middleditchs loyalty but I reckon stronger action is needed for darcy 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xmas Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Yes but it was Sunday morning for me when I replied as I don't live in the UK mate anyway who cares I use to really enjoy this forum but lately I've no idea why I dont And your sitting replying to him, I generally agree with the majority SCB`s posts on here, at least he has the debating skills to back up his argument, we await to see if you can do the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemini Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Rightly or wrongly must of the people on this forum understand the word debate. SCB will always put across his case and usually back it up with facts to support his argument. If you disagree with people on here you need to back up why you disagree, its called an intellectual debate. Apart from his rants about traffic lights at roundabouts. He can't back them up with facts. But that's not for this thread as I'm still trying to protect 'Norbold's Hole.' 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Yes but it was Sunday morning for me when I replied as I don't live in the UK mate anyway who cares I use to really enjoy this forum but lately I've no idea why I don't So you seem quite happy for lunatics to rave on with wrong information, but don't like it when someone politely corrects them and not only that, explains why they were wrong. I would take that as something positive, an opportunity to learn something. Sadly for many these days they can't seem to handle being wrong. There is no shame in it, we are all wrong from time to time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Central Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 When it comes to giving presents for the festive season. We are always being told that 'A Puppy is not just for Christmas'. Apparently some people were given just one single brain cell. And it truly did 'only last for xmas'. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 (edited) It's irrelvant. It was a tribunal that Darcy had so it's only balance of probabilities. Technically they don't need a test if they can find half a dozen people to say he was drunk. It's not like a court of law. Tribunal? Law? Whatever?! The fact is the FIM turned up to the 'hearing' and produced a test machine and breath test certificate that DID NOT MATCH! Fact! We still await their explanation statement - which may give a clue as to why Ward ONLY got a 10-month ban - on the balance of probabilities , of course!? PS. Despite being a Poole fan, from the start I have stated that Ward should have had an appropriate punishment! (as per my signature) Edited March 29, 2015 by Skidder1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xmas Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 I seem quite happy?, do you know me? So you seem quite happy for lunatics to rave on with wrong information, but don't like it when someone politely corrects them and not only that, explains why they were wrong. I would take that as something positive, an opportunity to learn something. Sadly for many these days they can't seem to handle being wrong. There is no shame in it, we are all wrong from time to time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 I seem quite happy?, do you know me? You've stated that the person who was speaking 100% correctly was talking rubbish. That is the information required in this situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 You've stated that the person who was speaking 100% correctly was talking rubbish. That is the information required in this situation. you have got no chance of making these pedantic fools understanding mate. They just retort with rubbish rather than have any form of debate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The White Knight Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Quite right, WK. We don't want this thread taking over from norbold's hole as the longest ever thread do we? I think you are very cruel norbold. :rofl: Apart from his rants about traffic lights at roundabouts. He can't back them up with facts. But that's not for this thread as I'm still trying to protect 'Norbold's Hole.' ..................... and a very good job you are doing protecting it. DAMN IT!!! :mad: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris4gillian Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 It is rubbish, clearly you do not (don't) no (know) the difference between Drunk (drunk - capital D??) and just over the limit. But im (I'm) very sure you will try and tell me. (why the full stop??) If it was a Coventry rider i (I) dare say you wouldn't try very hard.. And (sentences don't start with 'And') you certainly wouldn't have that picture. I thought only kids did that sort of thing...if you mean be reasonably good at spelling and know what punctuation is then yes, kids do that sort of thing The bits in bold are self explanatory - seven blatantly obvious grammatical errors in not even two lines of text. I'd give up mentioning kids if I were you as they are obviously better educated than yourself 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 The bits in bold are self explanatory - seven blatantly obvious grammatical errors in not even two lines of text. I'd give up mentioning kids if I were you as they are obviously better educated than yourself Id give up trolling me if i were you. Your making yourself look stupid. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.