Tsunami Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Where does this leave Darcy regards getting a team spot (and visa) when the ban is served? Didn't there used to be a rule that a rider who was part of a 1-7 at the end of a season could not be re-introduced into that 1-7 during the following season? No there isn't. A rider can be reintroduced back into a team with the MC's approval. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILIPRISING Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Which I imagine Mr Nilsson took into account. And judged wholly appropriate. Agree Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 So where's the bit about the test being done wrong and the off-duty policeman? #MiddloIsAJoke You tell us. You seem to be the major waffler this afternoon with 2 posts in the space of 4 minutes, including the pointless one above. O like to keep you interested....! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Leslie Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 So Poole have got until 27 June to throw a few matches, and get the averages down, so that Janowski can be booted out and Ward take his place in time for the run-in to the play-offs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 (edited) I think that is the good thing, so he knows where he stands and although its in reality a 4 month ban during the season it sufficiently messes up his season so it will hopefully act as a deterent for him and others After the ban is over he should then be left to get on with his career as he will have served his ban. Only time will tell whether its been enough to teach him a lesson Lets hope there is no appeal eh ? You have seen this at the bottpm of the FIM statement? An appeal against the decision of the CDI may be lodged by the parties before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne (Switzerland) within 21 days of the date of receipt of the full reasoned CDI decision. Edited February 26, 2015 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Panda Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Poole fielding an illegal rider. Kicked out of the EL. Coventry promoted to Champions. At the time he rode he was not riding illegally................yes his points will be deducted not that it will make a huge difference and nothing can be done about that now................I think he only rode 2 matches scoring low points during that time................ Why should Poole be penalised for something that they had no involvement in.............it was an FIM event not a club event.............. RP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
500cc Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 I do find that part of the judgement a little odd given that the FIM could and probably should have suspended him immediately but did not do so, In effect he carried on riding and his clubs carried on using him with their tacit approval. I think that says more about the sport than the FIM. The FIM were checking things like if the off-duty police officer was really qualified because they are a responsible organisation. The sport of Speedway just carried on merrily oblivious to what had happened. He could have been suspended whilst under investigation. Speedway's choice. Not saying its right or wrong, but that wasn't tacit approval. As a sport though it needs a (nother) kick up the backside to operate in the real world. The sport had the right to let him ride whilst under investigation, but shouldn't bleat afterwards that has performances during that period are now nullified. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 I don't quite catch the point you are making with this, but it's very amusing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucifer sam Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Seems about the right punishment. Maybe time to lock this thread and move on.... All the best Rob 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 10 month ban is fairly acceptable though he has got off lightly. Lets hope it's a wake up call but I doubt it 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwatcher Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 What a total and utter farce. Should have got the full 2 years. This gives out no warnings at all. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
500cc Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 At the time he rode he was not riding illegally................yes his points will be deducted not that it will make a huge difference and nothing can be done about that now................I think he only rode 2 matches scoring low points during that time................ Why should Poole be penalised for something that they had no involvement in.............it was an FIM event not a club event.............. RP Agree with your first paragraph. Re-paragraph 2, Poole new he had failed a test. Whilst Poole shouldn't be penalised for that, they have to accept the ranifications linked to back-dating an offence. But where is the BSPA on this one? Ward was replaced by guests after the suspension. Prior to that I suspect he would have been charged with withholding services and Poole forced to ride a PL six pointer (or whatever that exact rule is). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheReturn Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Maybe time to lock this thread and move on.... Oh don't you just love forum police.. FFS this is a discussion forum, and this is a topical subject for discussions so why lock a thread that is not out of hand? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pugwash Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 So Poole have got until 27 June to throw a few matches, and get the averages down, so that Janowski can be booted out and Ward take his place in time for the run-in to the play-offs. It was a Matt Ford cunning plan all along. Aug 16th 2014, MF said to DW 'How do you feel about getting banned for the first few month's next season and then we can manipulate the averages'. DW said 'Cheers, don't mind if I do'. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Oh don't you just love forum police.. FFS this is a discussion forum, and this is a topical subject for discussions so why lock a thread that is not out of hand? One of the 'clever rrrsses' on here pulled me up for using that reference the other day! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salty Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 No there isn't. A rider can be reintroduced back into a team with the MC's approval. Surely what you meant was - yes there is (such a rule) but they can be re-introduced subject to the MC's approval. Surely all team changes require this ageement? Therefore, I'm a bit surprised it is still in the regulations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILIPRISING Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 I think that says more about the sport than the FIM. The FIM were checking things like if the off-duty police officer was really qualified because they are a responsible organisation. The sport of Speedway just carried on merrily oblivious to what had happened. He could have been suspended whilst under investigation. Speedway's choice. Not saying its right or wrong, but that wasn't tacit approval. As a sport though it needs a (nother) kick up the backside to operate in the real world. The sport had the right to let him ride whilst under investigation, but shouldn't bleat afterwards that has performances during that period are now nullified. THE FIM knew from day one who (the FIM doctor) carried out the test as it was done in the presence of the referee. It was an FIM event so any suspension of Ward's racing licence had to come from them, not the BSPA or SVEMO. They (the FIM Jury in attendance) could have imposed an immediate 28 day suspension and taken it from there but did not do so. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norbold Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 THE FIM knew from day one who (the FIM doctor) carried out the test as it was done in the presence of the referee. Now you tell us! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Central Posted February 26, 2015 Report Share Posted February 26, 2015 Poor old Peter Oakes. Writing a load of old bunkum in The Daily Star. And no one told him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.