Starman2006 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Did I say I did. Try reading others posts. Problem is mate, half on here don't read, they either take bits out of posts conveiniently, or they invent it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Problem is mate, half on here don't read, they either take bits out of posts conveiniently, or they invent it..so because wards camp say 7 days that is gospel?? Thats you're problem in a nutshell starry, you believe everything anyone connected says, then blindly defend them on here and end up looking a mug mostly. If Darcy or middlo say jump do you always say how bloody high? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrycuda Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 (edited) Post removed Edited June 2, 2015 by Barrycuda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate Nick Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 IMO the FIM may have up to 45 days to come to a decision but in this case I don't see why they are taking so long. It's cut and shut, he either passed or he failed, the procedure was done correctly or it wasn't. Where's the problem? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 (edited) so because wards camp say 7 days that is gospel?? Thats you're problem in a nutshell starry, you believe everything anyone connected says, then blindly defend them on here and end up looking a mug mostly. If Darcy or middlo say jump do you always say how bloody high? Thats my opinion. Noticed you've avoided the post and the question... Edited February 10, 2015 by Starman2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wackie Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 What post and question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 What post and question? Ha Ha ha, are you really being serious ? Do you all take it in turns ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 so because wards camp say 7 days that is gospel?? Thats you're problem in a nutshell starry, you believe everything anyone connected says, then blindly defend them on here and end up looking a mug mostly. If Darcy or middlo say jump do you always say how bloody high? Do you really believe both Middlo and Darcy would say 7 days if it hadn't been indicated. Why would anybody say if they had said if it hadn't. No sense or gain but a handy story for others to get their latch on it. BTW who's got the rope. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wackie Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Ha ha, yes? Have no idea what post or question your rambling on about again. I think you actually short circuit my brain, its amazing how confused I'm left after trying to decipher your posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The White Knight Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Do you really believe both Middlo and Darcy would say 7 days if it hadn't been indicated. Why would anybody say if they had said if it hadn't. No sense or gain but a handy story for others to get their latch on it. BTW who's got the rope. ME!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFa1-kciCb4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Ha ha, yes? Have no idea what post or question your rambling on about again. I think you actually short circuit my brain, Keep taking those Tablets mate... Do you really believe both Middlo and Darcy would say 7 days if it hadn't been indicated. Why would anybody say if they had said if it hadn't. No sense or gain but a handy story for others to get their latch on it. BTW who's got the rope. I wouldn't expect any of them to believe that mate.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norbold Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Did I say I did. Try reading others posts. I didn't say you did. Try reading what I wrote very slowly. I was asking you if you knew for a fact that the FIM had said they would report in seven days because as far as we know they have never said this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 (edited) Do you really believe both Middlo and Darcy would say 7 days if it hadn't been indicated. Why would anybody say if they had said if it hadn't. No sense or gain but a handy story for others to get their latch on it. BTW who's got the rope. middlo wasnt even there?.... Chinese whispers maybe Why would Edinburgh say Wolbert had a dodgy burger? Why would Ritchie say hed guest then not?? People say owt they want really Edited February 10, 2015 by Arson fire 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 middlo wasnt even there?.... Chinese whispers maybe Why would Edinburgh say Wolbert had a dodgy burger? Why would Ritchie say hed guest then not?? People say owt they want really Totally different context. Edinburgh and Richie might have personal reason to gain for the stance they took/said. Darcy on the other hand just puts his neck on the line if and when the FIM don't make a decision in 7 days. Even Darcy would know the rules with the 45 period. He had nothing to gain by saying it. This whole affair may not look good for Darcy and his stupid actions, but I think the blood thirsty approach and hanging mentality does not show these posters in very good light either. I see nobody has tried to defend their actions when their approach is compared to what would have happened if it was the BSPA and a rider disciplinary procedure. TWK You are too late for the rope. Stacks of posters already in the queue before you judging by previous posters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Totally different context. Edinburgh and Richie might have personal reason to gain for the stance they took/said. Darcy on the other hand just puts his neck on the line if and when the FIM don't make a decision in 7 days. Even Darcy would know the rules with the 45 period. He had nothing to gain by saying it. This whole affair may not look good for Darcy and his stupid actions, but I think the blood thirsty approach and hanging mentality does not show these posters in very good light either. I see nobody has tried to defend their actions when their approach is compared to what would have happened if it was the BSPA and a rider disciplinary procedure. TWK You are too late for the rope. Stacks of posters already in the queue before you judging by previous posters. personal gain could be to try hurry a decision so contracts can be signed, im not saying its not true, but i wouldnt take it as gospel either. The think the difference between the bspa and Fim is that the Fim state their timescales and have set precedence in previous cases. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salty Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Totally different context. Edinburgh and Richie might have personal reason to gain for the stance they took/said. Darcy on the other hand just puts his neck on the line if and when the FIM don't make a decision in 7 days. Even Darcy would know the rules with the 45 period. He had nothing to gain by saying it. This whole affair may not look good for Darcy and his stupid actions, but I think the blood thirsty approach and hanging mentality does not show these posters in very good light either. I see nobody has tried to defend their actions when their approach is compared to what would have happened if it was the BSPA and a rider disciplinary procedure. TWK You are too late for the rope. Stacks of posters already in the queue before you judging by previous posters. You say Darcy would know the rules regarding the 45 day period, but Middlo, who as we know is very close to Darcy, didn't seem to be aware about it judging by his tweets on the day of the hearing. It was clear he expected a judgement on the day. You sound like Starry with his (unsubstantiated) talk of hanging, but all I have read is people asking for a ban. The majority of those asking for a ban are asking for a ban less than the maximum, so hardly "blood thirsty". As for your example about the BSPA, it's a wee bit like apples and oranges, once we are in the auspices of the FIM the rules change somewhat and, as I keep saying, once the lawyers get involved then time becomes a slow moving concept. Obviously if it was the BSPA then the wheels would have been greased (maybe even palms), lessons would have been learnt, wrists would have been proferred and gentle slaps administered. And Poole wouldn't have needed a guest for the play-offs. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E I Addio Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Do you really believe both Middlo and Darcy would say 7 days if it hadn't been indicated. Why would anybody say if they had said if it hadn't. No sense or gain but a handy story for others to get their latch on it. BTW who's got the rope. Muddlo wasn't there so he wouldn't know. What Darcy actually said on twitter was "next week they will make a call". That can be interpreted in a variety of different ways. The truth is none of us really know what was said . After Darcy's excuse about not rehydrating properly which has absolutely nothing to do with it one has conclude that he is not the most reliable source of information. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 personal gain could be to try hurry a decision so contracts can be signed, im not saying its not true, but i wouldnt take it as gospel either. The think the difference between the bspa and Fim is that the Fim state their timescales and have set precedence in previous cases. Do you really think Darcy could influence such an archaic structure already issued in writing by the FIM. It's not common sense, and not in the realm of possibility, unless Darcy is being given unfair judgement by some on here. Yes. The BSPA make the decisions and get it over in as short a time as possible, rather than stick to a rigid and pathetic timescales, which the BSPA could and would never use. Instead of FIM read FIFA. Set up for their own convenience, rather giving the matter the priority any cases deserve. You say Darcy would know the rules regarding the 45 day period, but Middlo, who as we know is very close to Darcy, didn't seem to be aware about it judging by his tweets on the day of the hearing. It was clear he expected a judgement on the day. You sound like Starry with his (unsubstantiated) talk of hanging, but all I have read is people asking for a ban. The majority of those asking for a ban are asking for a ban less than the maximum, so hardly "blood thirsty". As for your example about the BSPA, it's a wee bit like apples and oranges, once we are in the auspices of the FIM the rules change somewhat and, as I keep saying, once the lawyers get involved then time becomes a slow moving concept. Obviously if it was the BSPA then the wheels would have been greased (maybe even palms), lessons would have been learnt, wrists would have been proferred and gentle slaps administered. And Poole wouldn't have needed a guest for the play-offs. Suggest you reread some of the info on this thread that is not proven, but been seems to have added for effect. He was 'drunk' apparently. He seems to have been over the meeting limit, but how can others on here interpret that as drunk. Where is their evidence. With your last sentence, I take it you don't do humour. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 Do you really think Darcy could influence such an archaic structure already issued in writing by the FIM. It's not common sense, and not in the realm of possibility, unless Darcy is being given unfair judgement by some on here. Yes. The BSPA make the decisions and get it over in as short a time as possible, rather than stick to a rigid and pathetic timescales, which the BSPA could and would never use. Instead of FIM read FIFA. Set up for their own convenience, rather giving the matter the priority any cases deserve. im not saying he could no, but i wouldnt take what he says as gospel either.... You sound as if you are posting with a bspa jacket and tie on mate, with a strong bias or dislike towards the FIM?? Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted February 10, 2015 Report Share Posted February 10, 2015 (edited) Muddlo wasn't there so he wouldn't know. What Darcy actually said on twitter was "next week they will make a call". That can be interpreted in a variety of different ways. The truth is none of us really know what was said . After Darcy's excuse about not rehydrating properly which has absolutely nothing to do with it one has conclude that he is not the most reliable source of information. And neither do you have any evidence that he wasn't told that. As I have said in answer to Arson, why would he put himself in the situation where he could look foolish if they didn't deliver the verdict in 7 days. He could not gain by saying it, only open himself to ridicule when it didn't happen. And the FIM as expected have done that. im not saying he could no, but i wouldnt take what he says as gospel either.... You sound as if you are posting with a bspa jacket and tie on mate, with a strong bias or dislike towards the FIM?? Lol Total bollocks mate, just something said to try and devalue what i am saying. Having been there and done it, could be advantages in discussions but not on the BSF. How in what way can my views be pro BSPA when they are not involved, FFS. I do have a strong dislike of both the FIM and FIFA. Would you want to defend either of them on their image and processes. Before this case I guess that most people would share my view, and agree that neither were fit for purpose. But then came along Darcy pissed and drunk at the GP. Edited February 10, 2015 by Tsunami 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.