Bandit59 Posted July 4, 2014 Report Share Posted July 4, 2014 Good luck to Glasgow in this one if you cant do it hopefully it will be achieved on Saturday 19th do miracles happen ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted July 4, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 4, 2014 (edited) Good luck to Glasgow in this one if you cant do it hopefully it will be achieved on Saturday 19th do miracles happen ? Thought the 19th was changed to August the 12th for the telly Sorry i see the 19th is the KO Cup Berwick v The Smugs now Edited July 4, 2014 by Paulco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edmon Posted July 4, 2014 Report Share Posted July 4, 2014 (edited) I take it the previous regulation that r/r for an assessed rider (i.e. Berge, assessed CMA 5.00) was restricted to 28 day period, has been discreetly removed, given that the Tigers continue to use this facility to their advantage, long after the 28 day period for the Frenchman has expired It is still there - but does Mr Harkess know his rulebook? Although it doesn't really matter as the R/R is for Christian Henry. Edited July 4, 2014 by edmon 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacksmith Posted July 4, 2014 Report Share Posted July 4, 2014 Does that mean you are allowed a guest for an assessed rider after 28 days, but not r/r? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted July 4, 2014 Report Share Posted July 4, 2014 It is still there - but does Mr Harkess know his rulebook? Although it doesn't really matter as the R/R is for Christian Henry. Does that mean you are allowed a guest for an assessed rider after 28 days, but not r/r? Believe either guest or r/r facility were subject to 28 days time limit in respect of an unavailable assessed rider. So looks like pity is being shown to the Buckfast Boys by ignoring the rulebook with regard to the absent Berge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazc Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 Believe either guest or r/r facility were subject to 28 days time limit in respect of an unavailable assessed rider. So looks like pity is being shown to the Buckfast Boys by ignoring the rulebook with regard to the absent Berge Don't drink that anymore we have re-discovered the delights off Eldorado tonic wine nice little tipple makes you pretty obnoxious and gives you an instant dis-like to anyone that say's the word ken more than 10 times in a conversation. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george.m Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 Believe either guest or r/r facility were subject to 28 days time limit in respect of an unavailable assessed rider. So looks like pity is being shown to the Buckfast Boys by ignoring the rulebook with regard to the absent Berge C'mon cyclone, it won't have gone past you that the converse of what you're suggesting is the Glasgow promotion have pulled a fast one under the noses of the BSPA Chairman et al. You don't expect us to believe that one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted July 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 C'mon cyclone, it won't have gone past you that the converse of what you're suggesting is the Glasgow promotion have pulled a fast one under the noses of the BSPA Chairman et al. You don't expect us to believe that one! Exactly , the ruling must have changed . With the BSPA's Exhalted Cyclops sitting in residence 20 odd miles away along the M8 , there's no chance of us pulling a fast one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edmon Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 Exactly , the ruling must have changed . With the BSPA's Exhalted Cyclops sitting in residence 20 odd miles away along the M8 , there's no chance of us pulling a fast one No change to the rule in any Supplementary Regulations issued by the SCB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted July 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 No change to the rule in any Supplementary Regulations issued by the SCB. So are we using illegal guests then ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazc Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 It is pretty clear that anyone with half a brain can work out that we have been granted a facility or we wouldn't be permitted to do it FFS why are we debating this with them anyway who really care's what they think. Having to watch them humping team after team at the midden is getting boring now and they have branched out into other team's affairs hold on take that back they have alway's done that I am sure edmon will keep us right on any future change's as i have to pop out as i go out now & again . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted July 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 It is pretty clear that anyone with half a brain can work out that we have been granted a facility or we wouldn't be permitted to do it FFS why are we debating this with them anyway who really care's what they think. Having to watch them humping team after team at the midden is getting boring now and they have branched out into other team's affairs hold on take that back they have alway's done that I am sure edmon will keep us right on any future change's as i have to pop out as i go out now & again . Calm yourself , obviously we have been granted a facility . I actually think we should have signed a short term replacement , but after the way we were cheated in the David Bellego affair , the reluctance to do so is understandable . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazc Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 So are we using illegal guests then ? Don't pander to them bruv why they feel the need to comment is pretty astonishing anyway it is not as if we actually pose a threat to them anyway . Calm yourself , obviously we have been granted a facility . I actually think we should have signed a short term replacement , but after the way we were cheated in the David Bellego affair , the reluctance to do so is understandable . The smiley at the end means that i am perfectly calm aright and don't tell me to calm myself oops sorry about that that's me calm now . 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenway Bleachers Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 An assessed rider on a 5 point ave can have the 28 day facility extended as long as there is the prospect of returning soon. Glasgow seem to have exercised this facility, which seems fair. Bring it on, and hope weather behaves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted July 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 An assessed rider on a 5 point ave can have the 28 day facility extended as long as there is the prospect of returning soon. Glasgow seem to have exercised this facility, which seems fair. Bring it on, and hope weather behaves. So despite the protestations from our rule book experts from the east , we haven't actually done anything wrong ........................phew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 An assessed rider on a 5 point ave can have the 28 day facility extended as long as there is the prospect of returning soon. Glasgow seem to have exercised this facility, which seems fair. Bring it on, and hope weather behaves. How soon will that be,since Glasgow have been using the facility since 4th May, which will 63 days come tomorrow ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenway Bleachers Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 Soon is an entity lawyers dine out on.... Glasgow believe the medics that Berge will return end of July, however that advice may have come from an ambulance in Workington, or from a well lubricated source in the Berwick area. You can never be sure with the Tiggers, best for Monarchs just to win the meeting I would say, Campton can guest and no excuses either way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazc Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 (edited) How soon will that be,since Glasgow have been using the facility since 4th May, which will 63 days come tomorrow ? Who Knows come to think off it you seem to be the only one that actually cares anyway after last night's sun off and now trying to pass the buck to the poor old referee you would be better getting the story on that one right first. Edited July 5, 2014 by Gazc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted July 5, 2014 Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 Don't drink that anymore we have re-discovered the delights off Eldorado tonic wine nice little tipple makes you pretty obnoxious and gives you an instant dis-like to anyone that say's the word ken more than 10 times in a conversation. Oh shoot, thats me in trouble. Where do you stand on 'fit like'? Who Knows come to think off it you seem to be the only one that actually cares anyway after last night's sun off and now trying to pass the buck to the poor old referee you would be better getting the story on that one right first. or indeed as it was done at speed, the buckfast? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted July 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2014 How soon will that be,since Glasgow have been using the facility since 4th May, which will 63 days come tomorrow ? When he's fit and not before Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.