Main Man Posted May 5, 2014 Report Share Posted May 5, 2014 BUXTON 10 ( Adam Extance 3r 6 , Tom Bacon 4r 4, Tom Woolley 1r 0, Bradley Seal 1r 0) STOKE 24 ( Layne Cupitt 4r 9+1, Sam Ward 4r 6+2, David Holt 4r 6+1, Rob Shuttleworth 1r 3) Ht 1 : Shuttleworth Holt Woolley (f/d) Bacon (f/d) 0-5 0-5 2 : Extance Cupitt Ward Seal (f/d) 3-3 3-8 3 : Extance Ward Cupitt Bacon 3-3 6-11 4 : Holt Ward Extance(f/d) 0-5 6-16 5 : Cupitt Bacon Holt 2-4 8-20 6 : Cupitt Bacon Ward 2-4 10-24 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mimmo Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 BUXTON 10 ( Adam Extance 3r 6 , Tom Bacon 4r 4, Tom Woolley 1r 0, Bradley Seal 1r 0) STOKE 24 ( Layne Cupitt 4r 9+1, Sam Ward 4r 6+2, David Holt 4r 6+1, Rob Shuttleworth 1r 3) Ht 1 : Shuttleworth Holt Woolley (f/d) Bacon (f/d) 0-5 0-5 2 : Extance Cupitt Ward Seal (f/d) 3-3 3-8 3 : Extance Ward Cupitt Bacon 3-3 6-11 4 : Holt Ward Extance(f/d) 0-5 6-16 5 : Cupitt Bacon Holt 2-4 8-20 6 : Cupitt Bacon Ward 2-4 10-24 Favour please Laurence. It says that David Holt scored 6+1 from 4-rides. Do you think you could enquire as to which heat he finished last in please, as the heat details shown, only show him as having taken three rides. Thanks Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuxtonTiger Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 (edited) Mike What you quote above suggests that the Stoke team had 13 rides!!! (does Laurence have differing maths qualifications to you & I) In fact David Holt took only 3 rides, heats 1, 4 & 5 of what can only be described as an "interesting" and entertaining match. Hope this helps. Jim Edited May 7, 2014 by BuxtonTiger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mimmo Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 Jim. In the report that 'Main Man' has posted, it clearly says David Holt scored 6+1 from 4-rides, which was my query, as I wanted clarification that he'd actually only had three rides. So yes that would suggest that our old pal has differing maths qualifications to you and I. However, I suspect he just reported what he was given by whomever that might have been, without checking it. So the original source of information is the one lacking in maths qualifications........I trust it wasn't you All the Best Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.