Steve Shovlar Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 Clearly he didn't think he touched himShamek came around the outside of Cook on bend three. Cook then pushed out, out and then further out with Shamek alongside him. Eventually Cook rode Shamek into the fence leaving bend four and Shemek went down at the very end of the air fence. Ref stuck yellow light on straight away. Dirty riding plain and simple If it had ben NP in a GP there would have been page after page on it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 Josh Grajczonek just gets better and better.. An excellent signing by the Pirates and all above board too He is and was. He was also avaliable to other clubs. KL even used him !!! Bit like the Poole Pirates management then Oh uh, those sour grapes must be near rotting by now.. Shamek came around the outside of Cook on bend three. Cook then pushed out, out and then further out with Shamek alongside him. Eventually Cook rode Shamek into the fence leaving bend four and Shemek went down at the very end of the air fence. Ref stuck yellow light on straight away. Dirty riding plain and simple If it had ben NP in a GP there would have been page after page on it. Give this a chance Steve, its only just started.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 Did Cook really fence Pawlicki or not because I did not see it. Lets put it this way, Shamek had no where to go.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lino wolf Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 Lets put it this way, Shamek had no where to go..thats racing im afraid ! Pawlicki should have opted for plan b ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalan Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 I like hard racing but in this instant Cook was at fault. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdmc82 Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Good effort by Belle Vue on a dusty track. Always gonna be hard when you lose a reserve so early on esp only having 1 rider in heat 9 when the other team are using a "guest" for a sacked rider who would have scored less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Panda Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 (edited) Too scared to tag Pawlicki in his tweet though! Coward. Love that Darcy did it for him Oh and he claims he didn't roll either. Comedy. Cook was downright dangerous in that move on Pawlicki..............and so much for his double points ride.......... Love that Darcy tagged Shamek though........... Did Cook really fence Pawlicki or not because I did not see it. Yes he did..............no question it was Cook's fault.......... RP Edited May 8, 2014 by Red Panda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris4gillian Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Did Cook really fence Pawlicki or not because I did not see it. Yes, he stuffed Shamek into the fence...the whole of the stadium saw it and Cookie was enemy No. 1 after that And that was the same heat in which he did a stone cold roller at the start yet AGAIN. What a plonker! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouch Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Nice to see Cook tell the world about his exclusion rather than keep silent as is the case with folk with something to hide. It also gives others right to reply if they feel the comments about them are out of order. I look forward to that chit chat. Nothing to enthuse about racing wise aside from Pawlicki's acrobatics. Surprised Worrall wasn't exclude when he hit Pawlicki's bike, even though he wasn't on it. Good to see Holder score well as he's not looked the same rider since returning from his horrendous injuries. He might not have another title in him but I think he can compete well in the GP's for a couple more years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midland Red Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Love that Darcy tagged Shamek Eh? What does that mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate Nick Posted May 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Nice to see Cook tell the world about his exclusion rather than keep silent as is the case with folk with something to hide. It also gives others right to reply if they feel the comments about them are out of order. I look forward to that chit chat. Nothing to enthuse about racing wise aside from Pawlicki's acrobatics. Surprised Worrall wasn't exclude when he hit Pawlicki's bike, even though he wasn't on it. Good to see Holder score well as he's not looked the same rider since returning from his horrendous injuries. He might not have another title in him but I think he can compete well in the GP's for a couple more years. Once the ref had marked his card Cook scores 1 0 1. Coincidence? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Panda Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Eh? What does that mean? On Twitter cos Cook did not RP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montie Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Cook,as much as i rate him shouldnt mouth of on Twitter about Pawlicki, should go and have a word with him face to face rather waiting till he hits the first road North!! acting like a coward is quite stupid,until hes as good as Pawlicki,he should keep his mouth shut and concentrate on getting to a higher level-- which i hope he does Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Panda Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Nice to see Cook tell the world about his exclusion rather than keep silent as is the case with folk with something to hide. It also gives others right to reply if they feel the comments about them are out of order. I look forward to that chit chat. Nothing to enthuse about racing wise aside from Pawlicki's acrobatics. Surprised Worrall wasn't exclude when he hit Pawlicki's bike, even though he wasn't on it. Why should Worrall have been excluded..........he was not the primary cause of the stoppage............... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Good effort by Belle Vue on a dusty track. Always gonna be hard when you lose a reserve so early on esp only having 1 rider in heat 9 when the other team are using a "guest" for a sacked rider who would have scored less. So your saying Lee Smart wouldn't have scored in a race where the opposition only had one rider! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces51 Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Shovlars opinion of Cook is well known, so anything he says can be taken with a very large pinch of salt. We have all seen on numerous occasions that he is incapable of being objective where Poole are concerned. His opinions carry no credibility. As always there are two sides to the story. We have heard what a handful of Poole fans think and a professional opinion from Cook. The truth may lie somewhere between. However, there is no history of Cook being a dirty rider so the likelihood is that whatever happened was unintentional. As for the rolling allegations, yes, I have seen him roll, as do many others, particularly when having to go from a poor gate. If he was the serial offender Shovlar would have you believe it is unlikely he would have been voted by the referees as their rider of the season last year. I don't approve of rolling but is it any different than all of the other things done to gain an unfair advantage. Staying down when a rider falls on the wrong end of a 5-1, doctoring the starting gates, delaying a signing so horses for courses guests can be used, even not repairing ruts to give the home team an advantage. Now who would sink that low. Shovlar needs to remember that he is an advocate of the win at all costs mentality. Perhaps he thinks that should apply only to Poole. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agrotron Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Cook fenced pawlicki evident to all in stadium as it erupted in boos, rolls at the start gives start marshall mouth then goes about being a belle end on twitter the kid needs to grow up he is a utter disgrace think he is starting to think he is bigger than he is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midland Red Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 On Twitter cos Cook did notRP Go on, then - what does that mean? I don't "do" Twitter (or whatever the in terminology is) so . . . . I didn't understand the original post (tag, Darcy, etc) and I can't make anything of the above reply Please could someone translate/explain for this arl codger! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nellie Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Go on, then - what does that mean? I don't "do" Twitter (or whatever the in terminology is) so . . . . I didn't understand the original post (tag, Darcy, etc) and I can't make anything of the above reply Please could someone translate/explain for this arl codger! Cook implied on Twitter that Pawlicki took a dive as opposed to being fenced, but didn't have the balls to include him in his tweet (which would have ensured Pawlicki seeing it). Darcy replied by tagging in Pawlicki, so that it would alert him to Cook's tweet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midland Red Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Cook implied on Twitter that Pawlicki took a dive as opposed to being fenced, but didn't have the balls to include him in his tweet (which would have ensured Pawlicki seeing it). Darcy replied by tagging in Pawlicki, so that it would alert him to Cook's tweet. Thank you, Nellie - I don't know what tagging is but I think I can see what it means Has Pawlicki responded? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.