Bandits4eva Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 sarah think we will win this one 52-38 think steen who is getting better each week will have a big say in the result as he will get at least 6 rides tonight. Hope so mate... Really do hope so.. Make yourself heard tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 The get out clause for the MC could be that Proctor would've made he debut last Thursday had it not been rained-off, as it stands what Sheffield are getting away with does look iffy. As I mentioned on the other thread. In 2010 Coventry signed Pawlicki, his debut was rained off. 3 days later Coventry had to go with a junior for Pawlicki when he was missing for a Polish Championship meeting. The fact the meeting had been rained off was not considered relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byker Biker Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 It would be totally ridiculous if Sheffield were not allowed a facility. The rule is there to stop team,s bringing in an injured rider specifically for the purpose of gaining a facility. Clearly that's not what Sheffield are doing, Ty is a fully fledged active team member but of course the plethora of doubling up/down means a lot of extra absentees. Facility or not I expect Berwick to take a big lead in this match. It will be even more ridiculous if they are allowed a facility and Proctor doesn't ride for them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 So Sheffield are using r/r for Adam Roynon tonight . Hope the young man recovers from this latest injury 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Najjer Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 So Sheffield are using r/r for Adam Roynon tonight . Hope the young man recovers from this latest injury I presume a 28 days is set to follow too then, for withholding his services - however, as we well know the isn't the case and he's been stitched up well and truly by Sheffield and Ty Proctor. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 So all those blithering crap about R/R should be allowed for Proctor, now what? They have had to use the facility for Adam Roynon. What a joker! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Maybe Sheffield are using r/r for a back dated injury Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekker Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Its an old tactic of putting the dropped rider back in if there' s been a hiccup then out comes the witholding services stuff.... be interesting to see if Proctor actually makes it into a tigers shirt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screm Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Its an old tactic of putting the dropped rider back in if there' s been a hiccup then out comes the witholding services stuff.... be interesting to see if Proctor actually makes it into a tigers shirt. Even more interesting to see if Roynon cops a 28-day ban for withholding his services. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekker Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Unlikely given past history in such situations.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Its an old tactic of putting the dropped rider back in if there' s been a hiccup then out comes the witholding services stuff.... be interesting to see if Proctor actually makes it into a tigers shirt. Surprised at Berwick just rolling over , Peter Waite wouldn't have . Back in the day Glasgow dropped Trent Leverington to bring in Leon Madsen . Madsen subsequently changed his mind . Glasgow tried to re-introduce Leverington for their next meeting ( at Berwick ) and Peter Waite objected and Leverington couldn't ride . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekker Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) Surprised at Berwick just rolling over , Peter Waite wouldn't have . Back in the day Glasgow dropped Trent Leverington to bring in Leon Madsen . Madsen subsequently changed his mind . Glasgow tried to re-introduce Leverington for their next meeting ( at Berwick ) and Peter Waite objected and Leverington couldn't ride . As team had already been declared if i remember. Edited May 3, 2014 by Dekker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_Jones Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Even more interesting to see if Roynon cops a 28-day ban for withholding his services. Sheffield should get the 28 day ban for withholding Roynon's services. Good to see the new promotion maintaining their high standard of professionalism. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioness Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 As team had already been declared if i remember. Was the Sheffield team not already declared for tonights meeting at Berwick as well though? (genuine question, I dont know) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_Jones Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Was the Sheffield team not already declared for tonights meeting at Berwick as well though? (genuine question, I dont know) The latest Team Declaration, issued on the 1st, still has Roynon in the team. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekker Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 Was the Sheffield team not already declared for tonights meeting at Berwick as well though? (genuine question, I dont know) would assume yes, which explains the talk of protests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulco Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 The latest Team Declaration, issued on the 1st, still has Roynon in the team. So why then did everybody assume Proctor would have ridden on Thursday ( the 1st ) had the meeting went ahead ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dekker Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 The latest Team Declaration, issued on the 1st, still has Roynon in the team. Assumes website is upto date but still interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_Jones Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 So why then did everybody assume Proctor would have ridden on Thursday ( the 1st ) had the meeting went ahead ? http://www.speedwaygb.co/news.php?extend.24777 http://www.speedwaygb.co/news.php?extend.24796 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted May 3, 2014 Report Share Posted May 3, 2014 So why then did everybody assume Proctor would have ridden on Thursday ( the 1st ) had the meeting went ahead ?because Sheffield released a statement saying they'd signed proctor and released roynon... Only in speedway lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.