Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peterborough Panthers 2014


Recommended Posts

I am more interested as to why they turned it down, it seems to be similar to the Newcastle change which saw King and Greaves replace Henry and Rosen, out and out no 1 and second string for two heat leaders

 

If it fits why have they refused it?, what does Newcastle's application have that ours doesn't, other than a member on the MC.

probably they used in the best interests card for king ,it seems pretty obvious now he wasn't getting paid from the brummies , he probably couldn't afford to carry on unless he went to Newcastle (we all have bills to pay) , IF that was the case it seems the right decision to me with danny . As for rory you know he'll always get paid from the stars promo

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

praise the lord and the bspa that they did !!! , I must be watching different matches at the showground because they've looked weak at reserve to me (before barrett was signed) bringing greenwood back and sticking barrett in the main body with a no1 who'd get nowhere near his average would have been suicide ,

Have you not thought it could have been Greenwood for Jacobs. Probably averages wouldn't have worked though, I don't know, I can never work them out nowadays. Will anyone from Panthers let us know why the BSPA said no.

Bit of a stupid time to redeclare with Rory, as Edinburgh are at Alwalton on Sunday, and who is in charge of he Monarchs, none other than the chairman of the Promoters association!!!!

Come on Neil, let us have the reasons, and why it was in the Telegraph and not on the website yesterday. In fact still not on five minutes ago.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you not thought it could have been Greenwood for Jacobs. Probably averages wouldn't have worked though, I don't know, I can never work them out nowadays. Will anyone from Panthers let us know why the BSPA said no.

Bit of a stupid time to redeclare with Rory, as Edinburgh are at Alwalton on Sunday, and who is in charge of he Monarchs, none other than the chairman of the Promoters association!!!!

Come on Neil, let us have the reasons, and why it was in the Telegraph and not on the website yesterday. In fact still not on five minutes ago.

 

let the paranoia begin :rofl:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt think you could make a change by joining 2 riders averages together and then replacing them with 2 other riders with a lower combined average. I thought it had to be on either a 1 for 1 basis, or on the overall average of the whole team. I am sure Neil will tell me if I have that one wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didnt think you could make a change by joining 2 riders averages together and then replacing them with 2 other riders with a lower combined average. I thought it had to be on either a 1 for 1 basis, or on the overall average of the whole team. I am sure Neil will tell me if I have that one wrong.

If you are changing TWO or more riders it has to fit under the team limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the BSPA had the best interests of the sport at heart they would publicise WHY this has been turned down.

Like just about everyone else I have no idea. I can hazard a guess (or three conspiracy theories) which certainly don't have the interests of the BRITISH aspect of the sport at heart. Surely that's what is is about. After all it is the BRITISH Speedway Promoters Association isn't it?

 

Presumably Peterboro now have to either use guests (not ideal), R/R (less so) or import yet another foreigner who will miss meetings and cost the earth.

 

Come on BSPA or Neil tell us why, then we might just understand.

Edited by Star Lady
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would have been a p*** poor team if those changes had gone through.

 

Didn't realise the BSPA MC only consisted of Alex Harkess.

 

In most cases, the BSPA MC consists of one bloke with an interest and others who shrug shoulders and go with the flow.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to hear the explanation as well,

What I meant was you cant seriously believe that Harkess would get away with stopping the move just because we are there this weekend, be serious.

I know our Tigger friends from the west like to call him the dark lord, don't you start believing their Banter, oh the banter ;)

Also is it not about time your own club "broke" the story, rather than leaving it to the local rag.

Anyway another win for us on Sunday, #believe :t:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy