dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted December 7, 2013 Report Share Posted December 7, 2013 It might be me - but I don't fully understand that post!!??I took this to mean a League sponsor - money to clubs and then a tv coverage sponsor - majority money to Sky to offset production costs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 7, 2013 Report Share Posted December 7, 2013 And lets hope some of any profits get ploughed back into British Speedway.. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kester Posted December 7, 2013 Report Share Posted December 7, 2013 And lets hope some of any profits get ploughed back into British Speedway.. I can't believe for one moment there's any chance of that happening, it'll go entirely on propping up ailing businesses. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byker Biker Posted December 7, 2013 Report Share Posted December 7, 2013 My understanding is that if plans come through British Speedway will be better off financially as they have tv rights deal which will help attract sponsors to clubs as can offer exposure. This is also along with league sponsors and tv coverage. Sponsors although this will be majority kept by the broadcaster. [/] Jet lagged? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 7, 2013 Report Share Posted December 7, 2013 And lets hope some of any profits get ploughed back into British Speedway.. Why? Surely the only people who will benefit should be the club staging a TV meeting.? How they chose to use it is up to them surely? I can't believe for one moment there's any chance of that happening, it'll go entirely on propping up ailing businesses. Exactly. they should be the only beneficiaries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 (edited) Why? Surely the only people who will benefit should be the club staging a TV meeting.? How they chose to use it is up to them surely? Exactly. they should be the only beneficiaries. Yeh, but you tell me how the hell we suposed to bring on and give the British kids the facillities they need to bring them on? Edited December 9, 2013 by Starman2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BWitcher Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 Yeh, but you tell me how the hell we suposed to bring on and give the British kids the facillities they need to bring them on? Don't spend 20k on riders and drop them a couple of weeks later would be a start. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 (edited) Yeh, but you tell me how the hell we suposed to bring on and give the British kids the facillities they need to bring them on? Promoters are in the sport for one reason - promoting the sport not subsidising training ventures of young riders. Promoters make an initial investment and are entitled to a maximum return at the end of the day for their financial input. As speedway is constructed in regard to riders they are all freelances and not contracted to a club. There is no purpose in a promoter training young riders when he will have no contractual hold over the end product. That's a harsh reality of the promotional world. The training of young riders is something that needs to be dealt with through other means rather than skimming of deserved returns for a person prepared to promote a track as is the case when they allow SKY the facilities to screen one of their matches. Edited December 9, 2013 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 Promoters are in the sport for one reason - promoting the sport not subsidising training ventures of young riders. Promoters make an initial investment and are entitled to a maximum return at the end of the day for their financial input. As speedway is constructed in regard to riders they are all freelances and not contracted to a club. There is no purpose in a promoter training young riders when he will have no contractual hold over the end product. That's a harsh reality of the promotional world. The training of young riders is something that needs to be dealt with through other means rather than skimming of deserved returns for a person prepared to promote a track as is the case when they allow SKY the facilities to screen one of their matches. So, by what other means do you suggest to bring on the kids. And how will that be financed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A ORLOV Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 So, by what other means do you suggest to bring on the kids. And how will that be financed? It should be done by using a percentage of any income the bspa receives, ie tv income and surplus income from the meetings the bspa run, also a levy could be placed on each club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 It should be done by using a percentage of any income the bspa receives, ie tv income and surplus income from the meetings the bspa run, also a levy could be placed on each club. There are already incentives this year to encourage teams to have NL teams. It's getting there. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 Promoters are in the sport for one reason - promoting the sport not subsidising training ventures of young riders. Promoters make an initial investment and are entitled to a maximum return at the end of the day for their financial input. As speedway is constructed in regard to riders they are all freelances and not contracted to a club. There is no purpose in a promoter training young riders when he will have no contractual hold over the end product. That's a harsh reality of the promotional world. The training of young riders is something that needs to be dealt with through other means rather than skimming of deserved returns for a person prepared to promote a track as is the case when they allow SKY the facilities to screen one of their matches. So, by what other means do you suggest to bring on the kids. And how will that be financed? It should be done by using a percentage of any income the bspa receives, ie tv income and surplus income from the meetings the bspa run, also a levy could be placed on each club. The answer is provided basically by A Orlov. The need for training young riders is the responsibility of the BSPA not of individual promoters. This funding should come from any original commission to the BSPA (if there is any - I don't know). At the end of the day, promoting a track/club is a business venture not to fund training schemes and subsequently not have the exclusive use of any talent that develops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theknow 2 Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 So if we look at the last 5 years of SKY tv whats has really happened to the 6.2 million. I know this is not a fortune but surely more could of been done with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ten years after Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 The answer is provided basically by A Orlov. The need for training young riders is the responsibility of the BSPA not of individual promoters. This funding should come from any original commission to the BSPA (if there is any - I don't know). At the end of the day, promoting a track/club is a business venture not to fund training schemes and subsequently not have the exclusive use of any talent that develops. Promoters should always be prepared to fund and promote their own riders. If successful other riders will follow and ultimately will make you club and British Speedway stronger, without those draining foreign rider on costs. Don't forget as in all sports its a numbers game and the bigger the base the higher the apex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedibee Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 The answer is provided basically by A Orlov. The need for training young riders is the responsibility of the BSPA not of individual promoters. This funding should come from any original commission to the BSPA (if there is any - I don't know). At the end of the day, promoting a track/club is a business venture not to fund training schemes and subsequently not have the exclusive use of any talent that develops. The Bspa are a group of businessmen who are not very good at business , they don't have money to fund training schemes etc because when ever a significant windfall comes along , They allow other more shrewd businessmen or Tango coloured conmen to take it off them , The directors of BSI must spend a lot of time laughing at how they managed to get the Gp series out of the hands of the BSPA for a couple of magic Beans , It's got to be like all their Christmases have come at once , speedway promoters do all their training for them and pay their apprentices until they are of good enough standard to be sold as product , and even arranges it's own domestic calendar so as not to inconvenience them , and they have such little business sense that they sign up for a Tv deal which sees crowd levels for televised matches drop significantly yet tango man winds up with most of the money , how bright do you think a businessman would need to be to not sign a media rights deal that meant they had to pay media rights to show clips of their own assets on websites the media rights company forced them to buy ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reliant Robin Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 The Bspa are a group of businessmen who are not very good at business , they don't have money to fund training schemes etc because when ever a significant windfall comes along , They allow other more shrewd businessmen or Tango coloured conmen to take it off them , The directors of BSI must spend a lot of time laughing at how they managed to get the Gp series out of the hands of the BSPA for a couple of magic Beans , It's got to be like all their Christmases have come at once , speedway promoters do all their training for them and pay their apprentices until they are of good enough standard to be sold as product , and even arranges it's own domestic calendar so as not to inconvenience them , and they have such little business sense that they sign up for a Tv deal which sees crowd levels for televised matches drop significantly yet tango man winds up with most of the money , how bright do you think a businessman would need to be to not sign a media rights deal that meant they had to pay media rights to show clips of their own assets on websites the media rights company forced them to buy ?I'm sure there's a point in there somewhere despite a lot of ill informed waffle 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Leslie Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 I'm sure there's a point in there somewhere despite a lot of ill informed waffleI'm not so sure. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pugwash Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 The Bspa are a group of businessmen who are not very good at business , they don't have money to fund training schemes etc because when ever a significant windfall comes along , They allow other more shrewd businessmen or Tango coloured conmen to take it off them , The directors of BSI must spend a lot of time laughing at how they managed to get the Gp series out of the hands of the BSPA for a couple of magic Beans , It's got to be like all their Christmases have come at once , speedway promoters do all their training for them and pay their apprentices until they are of good enough standard to be sold as product , and even arranges it's own domestic calendar so as not to inconvenience them , and they have such little business sense that they sign up for a Tv deal which sees crowd levels for televised matches drop significantly yet tango man winds up with most of the money , how bright do you think a businessman would need to be to not sign a media rights deal that meant they had to pay media rights to show clips of their own assets on websites the media rights company forced them to buy ? What rights would the BSPA have had over any GP series? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Jasper Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 To say that the BSPA are soleley responsible for bringing on tomorrows stards is highly flawed in my view, it has to be a collaboration between the clubs and the BSPA. The clubs are in touch with the fans weekly and are able to go out into the community. It makes sense for them to be involved with nurturing the youth riders. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHILIPRISING Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 What rights would the BSPA have had over any GP series? NONE ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.