TMW Posted December 16, 2013 Report Share Posted December 16, 2013 Didn't you read the post? It's easily achievable. A half decent second string will average 7+ it's asking for a promoter with a will to win to take advantage. I sincerely hope they all have the will to win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted December 16, 2013 Report Share Posted December 16, 2013 The more you read about formats etc the more madness it seems. What the bloody hell are they going to average wise in 2015. Do try to keep up Cr. already been said that the reserves rides won't give them averages due to the selective opposition. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy robin Posted December 16, 2013 Report Share Posted December 16, 2013 Do try to keep up Cr. already been said that the reserves rides won't give them averages due to the selective opposition. Sorry it wasn't meant to be about the reserves average but the riders at 2 & 4 who get easier rides than a rider at 1,3 & 5 so could easily end up with a higher average but an inferior rider. For example a no 1 rides 3 times againgst Iversen & Bjerre. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted December 16, 2013 Report Share Posted December 16, 2013 Matt K good spot. If I alter heat 1 to 1 3 v 1 4 and heat 3 to 4 5 v 3 5 . It would solve that problem. Personally, think the BSA made the statement about keeping the reserves away from the heat leaders without realising how difficult it is to do. Especially if every rider goes out of all four gates during the meeting. How about doing away with fixed gates then? Just alternate gates 1&3 and 2&4 every heat so each team gets 7 of each in the programmed races. The team mates then pick the gates they'd like form the two. Darcy may think, "I'm a crap gater anyway, I'll let my team mate have the good gate and I'll race for my points" while a gater like say, Bjarne (more so that most others before anyone jumps in) may pick the better gate to be sure of the 3 points. Adds a further team element and something for the team manger to look out for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conkers in Gravy Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 Sorry it wasn't meant to be about the reserves average but the riders at 2 & 4 who get easier rides than a rider at 1,3 & 5 so could easily end up with a higher average but an inferior rider. For example a no 1 rides 3 times againgst Iversen & Bjerre. Isn't it much the same as the current heat format? A second string has a good spell and moves up the averages, taking over a heat leader spot where he has harder rides and either settles in or drops back down again. Don't see the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 Isn't it much the same as the current heat format? A second string has a good spell and moves up the averages, taking over a heat leader spot where he has harder rides and either settles in or drops back down again. Don't see the problem. The current format you have 1 harder race (heat 13) or if you drop down one easier race (heat 2) but this format you'll have 3 harder races. It will make a massive difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Crew Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 Be interesting to see who picks up Chris Harris on a 5.00 average in 2015.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluPanther Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 Be interesting to see who picks up Chris Harris on a 5.00 average in 2015.... The SGP wildcard club will probably be first.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
500cc Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 How about doing away with fixed gates then? Just alternate gates 1&3 and 2&4 every heat so each team gets 7 of each in the programmed races. The team mates then pick the gates they'd like form the two. Darcy may think, "I'm a crap gater anyway, I'll let my team mate have the good gate and I'll race for my points" while a gater like say, Bjarne (more so that most others before anyone jumps in) may pick the better gate to be sure of the 3 points. Adds a further team element and something for the team manger to look out for. I like this in principle, and tactically it makes for more interest. The trouble is persuading the top riders to take a worse gate if they see a risk to their earning potential. Often on this forum people reference back to the higher averages riders attained in the 70's and 80's. One of the factors was that the top riders invariably took the best gates. I suspect when a top rider is up against a rider of a similar level he will resort to demanding the better gate position. I think it adds far more strategy, but I'm not convinced the better riders will fully buy in to it. They shouldn't have a choice, but they will. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waiheke1 Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 One of the factors was gate positions, but imho the much bigger factor was introduction of the nominated heat. Were they both introduced in 1988, or did tge fixed positions come in later? The current format you have 1 harder race (heat 13) or if you drop down one easier race (heat 2) but this format you'll have 3 harder races. It will make a massive difference.And of course the easy rides will be easier than previous seasons due to the wesker reserves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormMarketing Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 has it ever been tried to mix it up with team mates running out of gates 1 & 2 and the opposition running out of 3&4 in a few heats?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
500cc Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 has it ever been tried to mix it up with team mates running out of gates 1 & 2 and the opposition running out of 3&4 in a few heats?? Many times, until the ref spots them in the wrong gates and instructs them to move !!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Smith Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 has it ever been tried to mix it up with team mates running out of gates 1 & 2 and the opposition running out of 3&4 in a few heats?? This was tried for 1 or 2 seasons in the PLKO Cup but got scrapped as teammates were taking each other out on the 1st turn to often. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humphrey Appleby Posted December 17, 2013 Report Share Posted December 17, 2013 One of the factors was gate positions, but imho the much bigger factor was introduction of the nominated heat. Were they both introduced in 1988, or did tge fixed positions come in later? And of course the easy rides will be easier than previous seasons due to the wesker reserves. I seem to remember the nominated heat being trialled in 1987 in the KOC, although I can't remember if fixed gates were used as well. Certainly fixed gates came in for 1988. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrycuda Posted January 3, 2014 Report Share Posted January 3, 2014 Ht1 1 2 1 2 Ht2 6 7 6 7 Ht3 4 5 4 5 Ht4 1 3 1 3 Ht5 6 7 6 7 Ht6 3 5 3 5 Ht7 2 7 2 7 Ht8 3 4 5 6 Ht9 5 6 3 4 Ht10 1 2 5 6 Ht11 4 7 4 7 Ht12 5 6 1 2 Ht13 1 2 3 4 Ht14 3 4 1 2 Ht15 N N N N Remove Tactical Ride Rule With Following Points Score System (To stop leading team from sitting on a 8 point lead and to stop losing team from dropping heat points to gain tactical ride) LEAGUE SCORING SYSTEM Home loss by any amount of points = 0 (No Change) Home draw = 1 (No Change) Home win by between 1 and 6 points = 2 (Home win by between 1 and 10 points = 2) Home win by 7 points or more = 3 (Home win by 11 points or more = 3) Away loss by 7 points or more = 0 (Away loss by 11 points or more = 0) Away loss by 6 points or less = 1 (Away loss by 10 points or less = 1) Away draw = 2 (No Change) Away win by between 1 and 6 points = 3 (Away win by between 1 and 10 points = 3) Away win by 7 points or more = 4 (Away win by 11 points or more = 4) Change Race Points To Following 4points Win 2points Second 1point Third 0point Fourth non finish etc Riders Paid As Following (Not Per Point) X £ Per Start + X £ Per Win X £ Per Start + X £ Per Second X £ Per Start + X £ Per Third X £ Per Start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted January 3, 2014 Report Share Posted January 3, 2014 Ht1 1 2 1 2 Ht2 6 7 6 7 Ht3 4 5 4 5 Ht4 1 3 1 3 Ht5 6 7 6 7 Ht6 3 5 3 5 Ht7 2 7 2 7 Ht8 3 4 5 6 Ht9 5 6 3 4 Ht10 1 2 5 6 Ht11 4 7 4 7 Ht12 5 6 1 2 Ht13 1 2 3 4 Ht14 3 4 1 2 Ht15 N N N N Remove Tactical Ride Rule With Following Points Score System (To stop leading team from sitting on a 8 point lead and to stop losing team from dropping heat points to gain tactical ride) LEAGUE SCORING SYSTEM Home loss by any amount of points = 0 (No Change) Home draw = 1 (No Change) Home win by between 1 and 6 points = 2 (Home win by between 1 and 10 points = 2) Home win by 7 points or more = 3 (Home win by 11 points or more = 3) Away loss by 7 points or more = 0 (Away loss by 11 points or more = 0) Away loss by 6 points or less = 1 (Away loss by 10 points or less = 1) Away draw = 2 (No Change) Away win by between 1 and 6 points = 3 (Away win by between 1 and 10 points = 3) Away win by 7 points or more = 4 (Away win by 11 points or more = 4) Change Race Points To Following 4points Win 2points Second 1point Third 0point Fourth non finish etc Riders Paid As Following (Not Per Point) X £ Per Start + X £ Per Win X £ Per Start + X £ Per Second X £ Per Start + X £ Per Third X £ Per Start Thats made up, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philfromcov Posted January 3, 2014 Report Share Posted January 3, 2014 how about 2 for a win i for a draw and a bonus point over the two legs? seemed so simple at the time 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalkie Posted January 3, 2014 Report Share Posted January 3, 2014 how about 2 for a win i for a draw and a bonus point over the two legs? seemed so simple at the time Couldn't agree more! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyE Posted January 3, 2014 Report Share Posted January 3, 2014 Ht1 1 2 1 2 Ht2 6 7 6 7 Ht3 4 5 4 5 Ht4 1 3 1 3 Ht5 6 7 6 7 Ht6 3 5 3 5 Ht7 2 7 2 7 Ht8 3 4 5 6 Ht9 5 6 3 4 Ht10 1 2 5 6 Ht11 4 7 4 7 Ht12 5 6 1 2 Ht13 1 2 3 4 Ht14 3 4 1 2 Ht15 N N N N Remove Tactical Ride Rule With Following Points Score System (To stop leading team from sitting on a 8 point lead and to stop losing team from dropping heat points to gain tactical ride) LEAGUE SCORING SYSTEM Home loss by any amount of points = 0 (No Change) Home draw = 1 (No Change) Home win by between 1 and 6 points = 2 (Home win by between 1 and 10 points = 2) Home win by 7 points or more = 3 (Home win by 11 points or more = 3) Away loss by 7 points or more = 0 (Away loss by 11 points or more = 0) Away loss by 6 points or less = 1 (Away loss by 10 points or less = 1) Away draw = 2 (No Change) Away win by between 1 and 6 points = 3 (Away win by between 1 and 10 points = 3) Away win by 7 points or more = 4 (Away win by 11 points or more = 4) Change Race Points To Following 4points Win 2points Second 1point Third 0point Fourth non finish etc Riders Paid As Following (Not Per Point) X £ Per Start + X £ Per Win X £ Per Start + X £ Per Second X £ Per Start + X £ Per Third X £ Per Start And rider averages are calculated by ........? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrycuda Posted January 3, 2014 Report Share Posted January 3, 2014 Yes meeting heat format made up (Not set in stone) Swedish League riders average based on heat points average rather than meeting points average Like most people following speedway have not got the answer to everything. Just a few thoughts for the rest of you to think and talk about One other thought regarding meeting heat formats. How about 3 times 5 heat sets with point for each set won + 2points for highest total match score over the 15 heats (Each set starting from zero scores) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.