Islander15 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 (edited) Anyone got the full order in which the way the riders were picked! Everyone looks pretty good to be honest, Leicster look a little weak but thats due to Max Clegg being very inexperianced, so hope he can prove me wrong. Im a massive fan of Cleggy so but i was suprised he got a pick and so early on.Newman (protected)Kerr (protected) Rose (protected) Morris (protected) Ellis (protected) 1. Garrity (Coventry) 2. Nielsen (Belle Vue) 3. Blackbird (Eastbourne) 4. Perry (Leicester) 5. Worrall (Swindon) 6. Starke (Birmingham) Round 2 7. Bates (Swindon) 8. Clegg (Leicester) 9. Lambert (Birmingham) 10. Jacobs (Wolves) 11. Morley (Lakeside) 12. Reade (Belle Vue) 13. Halsey (Eastbourne) 14. Smart (Poole) 15. Sarjeant (Coventry) Edited December 3, 2013 by Islander15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunty Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 (edited) Newman (protected) Kerr (protected) Rose (protected) Morris (protected) Ellis (protected) 1. Garrity (Coventry) 2. Nielsen (Belle Vue) 3. Blackbird (Eastbourne) 4. Perry (Leicester) 5. Worrall (Swindon) 6. Starke (Birmingham) Round 2 7. Bates (Swindon) 8. Clegg (Leicester) 9. Lambert (Birmingham) 10. Jacobs (Wolves) 11. Morley (Lakeside) 12. Reade (Belle Vue) 13. Halsey (Eastbourne) 14. Smart (Poole) 15. Sarjeant (Coventry) One rider each team was protected? What happened to that rule! Clegg getting picked 13th is astonishing from Lecister! I just dont understand the order it went in? Edited December 3, 2013 by Hunty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMW Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 (edited) Newman (protected) Kerr (protected) Rose (protected) Morris (protected) Ellis (protected) 1. Garrity (Coventry) 2. Nielsen (Belle Vue) 3. Blackbird (Eastbourne) 4. Perry (Leicester) 5. Worrall (Swindon) 6. Starke (Birmingham) Round 2 7. Bates (Swindon) 8. Clegg (Leicester) 9. Lambert (Birmingham) 10. Jacobs (Wolves) 11. Morley (Lakeside) 12. Reade (Belle Vue) 13. Halsey (Eastbourne) 14. Smart (Poole) 15. Sarjeant (Coventry) Fair play to KL they have worked with the Lewis' to lose out so best protecting them it does make you wonder about rules in this sport. Why do they bother with any. Why not just let each team do their thing. You never know the sport maybe all the better for it rather than the constant smoke and mirrors Edited December 3, 2013 by TMW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Islander15 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 One rider each team was protected? What happened to that rule! Clegg getting picked 13th is astonishing from Lecister! I just dont understand the order it went in? No just Kerr, Rose, Ellis, Newman & Morris were protected. The order that the riders were picked in was what I posted. Round 2 was in reverse order of ranking dependent on who the round 1 rider was ie Swindon went first in round 2 because they picked the lowest ranked round 1 rider (Worrall). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz01 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Its suggested that if they have a EL/PL converted average over 3 the excess comes of the 32 pt limit for the top 5, which riders would that include if thats the case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil H Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 What a joke. Some of these riders are barely good enough for the Premier League let alone the 'Elite' League. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Its suggested that if they have a EL/PL converted average over 3 the excess comes of the 32 pt limit for the top 5, which riders would that include if thats the case?Only Kerr Garrity and Newman ( above 5 PL) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Fair play to KL they have worked with the Lewis' to lose out so best protecting them it does make you wonder about rules in this sport. Why do they bother with any. Why not just let each team do their thing. You never know the sport maybe all the better for it rather than the constant smoke and mirrorsThis encourages teams to actually work with young riders, have NL teams and plan a bit. If it was. Free for all then why should Lynn and Coventry bother with NL teams? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy jimmy Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 I haven't heard of BV guys, are they any good? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil The Ace Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 I haven't heard of BV guys, are they any good?[/quote Nielsen is good. He's mr entertainment. Mas for reade. Of he can re capture his 2012 form he will be decent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingbee Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Its suggested that if they have a EL/PL converted average over 3 the excess comes of the 32 pt limit for the top 5, which riders would that include if thats the case?somebody is telling you porkies do you think Cov would build there team and then have points taken of .never been mentioned before Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluPanther Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 I haven't heard of BV guys, are they any good?[/quote Nielsen is good. He's mr entertainment. Mas for reade. Of he can re capture his 2012 form he will be decent Saw Nielsen a few times at Ipswich this year, he was always falling off. Cant see the Aces making top 4 with those reserves.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz01 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 somebody is telling you porkies do you think Cov would build there team and then have points taken of .never been mentioned before The top 5 had a point to spare, maybe they planned it like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arthur cross Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 I remain very sceptical that this scheme will stand up to a full season of being tested by injuries and fixture clashes, never mind anything happening like the massive scores of Steve Boxall and Jon Armstrong in the first half of the 2006 Premier League season of A-B-C-graded reserves ... for example, according to this thread, Liam Carr has opted out of the draft but will he then be allowed into the scheme as a short-term signing in place of an injured rider from among today's 20 draft names ? At least it shouldn't be too difficult to avoid away fixture-clashes between Wednesday-home-track King's Lynn and Sunday-home-track Newcastle who have an Elite League reserve pairing also signed up for the same Premier League 1-to-7. But one selection looks like a logistical nightmare ... when Thursday-home-track Swindon made their first pick, were they aware that Steve Worrall had already signed for Friday-home-track Edinburgh ? !! Taken to its most awkward extreme, Steve could end up with the sequence of King's Lynn v Swindon on a Wednesday, then Swindon's home meeting the next night, and then the annual double-bill of Monarchs-Devils meetings at Edinburgh on the Friday and Plymouth on the Saturday !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevierol Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 First time that the BSPA have made anything interesting by carrying out the live Twitter results - what next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Fair play to KL they have worked with the Lewis' to lose out so best protecting them it does make you wonder about rules in this sport. Why do they bother with any. Why not just let each team do their thing. You never know the sport maybe all the better for it rather than the constant smoke and mirrors Rather than having the constant smoke and mirrors perception, they all agree to do a fair and agreed procedure to try and make it all fair and above board, but some like you still chunter on. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMW Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 This encourages teams to actually work with young riders, have NL teams and plan a bit. If it was. Free for all then why should Lynn and Coventry bother with NL teams? I agree whole heartedly although to be fair Garrity is hardly a product of Cov. I just don't know why they bother with rules they seem to be. Easily made easily broken Rather than having the constant smoke and mirrors perception, they all agree to do a fair and agreed procedure to try and make it all fair and above board, but some like you still chunter on. So your opinion is valued. My opinion is just chuntering Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingbee Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 The top 5 had a point to spare, maybe they planned it like that.if Garrity is on 5 that would be 2 points Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 I agree whole heartedly although to be fair Garrity is hardly a product of Cov. I just don't know why they bother with rules they seem to be. Easily made easily broken So your opinion is valued. My opinion is just chuntering Garrity may not be a product of Coventry but he's not a product of any EL teams NL team is he? Hence he was not linked to any team in the draft so a poor example there. if Garrity is on 5 that would be 2 points Garrity doesnt have an EL average. His Pl average is about 5.5 which converts to about 3.3 EL if we were using averages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz01 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 if Garrity is on 5 that would be 2 points He isnt at a guess he would be just over 3, no rider in this draft would have a 5pt EL average otherwise the likes of Roynon wouldve been included too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.