Wolfsbane Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Name the rule that Matt Ford is supposedly breaking!!?? Poole have redeclared - still within the 32 point 1-5 - for a minimum of 28 days. As long as Holder maintains an average above Darcy's then Darcy will return when fit! How's about pointing out where I said he was breaking the rules in the post you quoted Skid??!! I'm getting splinters in me ar$e from sitting on the fence. I was merely pointing out that Ford is playing by the same type of rules that govern MP's expenses ie $hit ones. If pushed personally I've no problem with Holder for Ward especially if he's feeling tired on may 4th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Panda Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 How's about pointing out where I said he was breaking the rules in the post you quoted Skid??!! I'm getting splinters in me ar$e from sitting on the fence. I was merely pointing out that Ford is playing by the same type of rules that govern MP's expenses ie $hit ones. If pushed personally I've no problem with Holder for Ward especially if he's feeling tired on may 4th WTF I have never read so much rubbish in my life............Holder's average is in keeping with the 32 point limit and he is a Poole asset.............he has signed 28 days cover and given enough notice to redeclare the team for Monday............where is the rule breaking/bending in that???????????? You cannot compare it with MP's expenses...........there is no comparison........... Sheesh some people really need to get a life............ RP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 It amazes me that when Poole do cheat some people don't comment but when Poole do nothing wrong those people come along and complain about it because they don't like it. Poole have done nothing wrong this time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 (edited) It amazes me that when Poole do cheat some people don't comment but when Poole do nothing wrong those people come along and complain about it because they don't like it. Poole have done nothing wrong this time. Really, you sure about that now?? you sure you don't want another look? im sure you've been skimming that little black book of yours for even the slightest infringement... Sleep well !! Edited April 11, 2014 by Starman2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Can you please show us where there is any mention of temporary replacements in the rules, as you seem to be fully aware of the rules from your statement. The only mention that I can find is for a facility for guest or r/r. The Guest must be in a current Team Declaration or on the FTDP List and in the case of a Guest for the #6 or #7 on the FTDP List only. I have no idea what the FTDP List is. Please explain. Shov never gets the rules right anyway so he would be clueless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfsbane Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 (edited) WTF I have never read so much rubbish in my life............Holder's average is in keeping with the 32 point limit and he is a Poole asset.............he has signed 28 days cover and given enough notice to redeclare the team for Monday............where is the rule breaking/bending in that???????????? You cannot compare it with MP's expenses...........there is no comparison........... Sheesh some people really need to get a life............ RP And you my friend need to get some specs and read what's actually posted (by me). Where did I say Poole shouldn't be allowed Holder for Ward? Have a look at the 'like' on SCB's last post. Bloody hell, there's a real victim syndrome down Dorsetshire way. Edited April 11, 2014 by Wolfsbane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Panda Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 And you my friend need to get some specs and read what's actually posted (by me). Where did I say Poole shouldn't be allowed Holder for Ward? Have a look at the 'like' on SCB's last post. Bloody hell, there's a real victim syndrome down Dorsetshire way. Actually I already wear glasses because without them I am almost totally blind.............. RP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Shov never gets the rules right anyway so he would be clueless. Think id rather listen to him than you... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Think id rather listen to him than you... Of course you would. You blue biases stick together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YerRopes Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 No problem with Chris replacing Darcy and I hope he has an injury-free spell on these shores.. Think id rather listen to him than you... But you're not sure are you Starman... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Think id rather listen to him than you... Anyone actually, even you!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 But you're not sure are you Starman... Hardly ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunRobin Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 It amazes me that when Poole do cheat some people don't comment but when Poole do nothing wrong those people come along and complain about it because they don't like it. Poole have done nothing wrong this time. Not sure how you can say that Poole have not done anything wrong. The rules clearly state that if a rider in your 1-7 for the previous season, is not in your declared 1-7 for this season, you can not re-declare with him in your side. Now it is not clear, who was in the 1st declaration for the Poole side this season, as it was announced that Ward was in the 1-7 for 2014 but the 1st declaration on 23rd/3 shows Holder & not Ward. So it would appear that either one of Ward or Holder would not be allowed in any re-declaration for 2014 under this rule. Secondly, Ward was in a re-declared side dated 4th April & then having been injured before he rode in the re-declared team, no facility should be allowed, only a 6 point PL rider. To my mind, a rule has been broken but I am not sure which one as there is so much murky water surrounding this affair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted April 11, 2014 Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 Not sure how you can say that Poole have not done anything wrong. The rules clearly state that if a rider in your 1-7 for the previous season, is not in your declared 1-7 for this season, you can not re-declare with him in your side. Now it is not clear, who was in the 1st declaration for the Poole side this season, as it was announced that Ward was in the 1-7 for 2014 but the 1st declaration on 23rd/3 shows Holder & not Ward. So it would appear that either one of Ward or Holder would not be allowed in any re-declaration for 2014 under this rule. Secondly, Ward was in a re-declared side dated 4th April & then having been injured before he rode in the re-declared team, no facility should be allowed, only a 6 point PL rider. To my mind, a rule has been broken but I am not sure which one as there is so much murky water surrounding this affair. You're mixing up the illegal guest which I complained about last week and bringing in Holder for Ward. Holder was not in Pooles 1-7 at the end of last season so it's ok to bring him in, plus as you say, he was in the original 1-7 anyway. Where there does become an issue is that if Holder was in the initial 1-7 then Ward should never have been allowed in and a guest never allowed for him. But the Holder in the declared team now is perfectly legal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunRobin Posted April 12, 2014 Report Share Posted April 12, 2014 You're mixing up the illegal guest which I complained about last week and bringing in Holder for Ward. Holder was not in Pooles 1-7 at the end of last season so it's ok to bring him in, plus as you say, he was in the original 1-7 anyway. Where there does become an issue is that if Holder was in the initial 1-7 then Ward should never have been allowed in and a guest never allowed for him. But the Holder in the declared team now is perfectly legal. Thanks for that explanation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted April 12, 2014 Report Share Posted April 12, 2014 Sounds to me that Swindon fans are getting worried about Fridays meetings and looking for an excuse by calling Poole cheats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunRobin Posted April 12, 2014 Report Share Posted April 12, 2014 Sounds to me that Swindon fans are getting worried about Fridays meetings and looking for an excuse by calling Poole cheats. The Super Troll from Penhill! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwatcher Posted April 12, 2014 Report Share Posted April 12, 2014 How come at the start of the season Holder said that there was no way that he was riding in This country this year as he need a break and time to heal and concentrate on this years GP. After Ward who rode like an absolute plonker in New Zealand, then crashes out and breaks his thumb. I have broken fingers and toes and carried on working in Heavy engineering all because I can't afford to take the time off work. Then because Holder, rode well in most of the races in the GP suddenly. Poole, send a little whoopy doo and he is suddendly going against all he said and riding in this country again. Sounds very strange to me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted April 12, 2014 Report Share Posted April 12, 2014 How come at the start of the season Holder said that there was no way that he was riding in This country this year as he need a break and time to heal and concentrate on this years GP. After Ward who rode like an absolute plonker in New Zealand, then crashes out and breaks his thumb. I have broken fingers and toes and carried on working in Heavy engineering all because I can't afford to take the time off work. Then because Holder, rode well in most of the races in the GP suddenly. Poole, send a little whoopy doo and he is suddendly going against all he said and riding in this country again. Sounds very strange to me. Is this a windup? Seriously you are joking, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted April 12, 2014 Report Share Posted April 12, 2014 How come at the start of the season Holder said that there was no way that he was riding in This country this year as he need a break and time to heal and concentrate on this years GP. After Ward who rode like an absolute plonker in New Zealand, then crashes out and breaks his thumb. I have broken fingers and toes and carried on working in Heavy engineering all because I can't afford to take the time off work. Then because Holder, rode well in most of the races in the GP suddenly. Poole, send a little whoopy doo and he is suddendly going against all he said and riding in this country again. Sounds very strange to me. You right your post does seem a litle strange... but i sympathise with your broken fingers.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.