Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Aces 2014


Recommended Posts

In a watered down League Cook will hit 9 Nicholls 8 and Worral 7.5. That's a hellva foundation the Aces management have put down

If rumours are to be believed it won't be watered down for heat leaders in fact it will be more difficult if they don't face reserves.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So With No Freddie an no Holder, that's just so far, it's not a watered down League. ? Not to mention 2 National League riders in the 1-7. Throw in the ever increasing R/R. The gap between the 2 Leagues has never been so close.

Yet not one PL side would get close to an EL side however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If British Speedway cannot afford the big boys riding over here, then yes, for me, that is the way to go. The Premier League is good quaility, as was proven by the likes of Cook, Worral, Barker, Doyle, and a good few others who doubled up last season. The problem c ould be with a self governing sport, as Speedway is, can anyone really see Promotion and relegation being permitted ?

 

 

Note Sorry Belle Vue fans I have taken this thread miles of track... I will leave it there

Edited by semion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Fast Freddie, Noddy Holder, apart from those two, which other "big names" will be missing in 2014........?

Or will it just be the mediocre, yet familiar foreigners that won't be in track.....?

Time will tell if anyone else will be missing.

 

 

Where in my post did I say they would get close, I said the gap is closer now that ever before or do you disagree with that ?

You didn't, i did. I suppose by taking out a couple of GP boys in theory the league is weaker - however my point remains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think some of the potential 1-5s look better than last year

There is a misconception that from a team building perspective that the points limit has been radically cut by 4.5 points, when actually in reality it's been reduced by less than 2 points (about 1.75).

 

So to an extent some teams may well look better. From a points building exercise, then Belle Vue appear to be a definite improvement as the points limit reduction has had no impact on them.

 

Edited because as SteveO pointed out it to say it was not cut but it was reduced was illogical. I meant to say the reduction isn't as large as the headline figures.

Edited by 500cc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a misconception that from a team building perspective that the points limit has been cut, when actually in reality it's been reduced by less than 2 points.

 

So to an extent some teams may well look better. From a points building exercise, then Belle Vue appear to be a definite improvement as the points limit reduction has had no impact on them.

There's no misconception - its been cut! Whether it is 1 point, 2 points or more - it's still a cut! :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there are fewer GP riders in the 2014 season it is not the points limit, it is the 36 match programme and the money on offer to complete it.

 

28 matches were too many for most GP stars, so 36 may tip others over the edge, as it has Lindgren and more importantly Holder.

 

The squad system must be around the corner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's no misconception - its been cut! Whether it is 1 point, 2 points or more - it's still a cut! :wink:

Guilty. That's what happen's when you race off to eat. Meant to say the reduction wasn't as large as being portrayed. Updated my original post and referenced your comment.

 

Still will get disagreements I'm sure, but at least I've corrected it to say what I meant to say !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DON'T know whether any money changed hands but they certainly didn't part on the best of terms. Quite a few bridges would need to be mended for Garrity and BV to be re-united but if they can each put their differences to one side it might be worth it.

Does raise an interesting question re-allocation and/or drafting in terms of both the rider and club being happy with the agreement. In most cases I'm sure any conflicting assignments can be managed, but it is a further "parameter" that will need including in the process. Assuming the "lead" reserve is allocated first, the difficulty may be related to the second reserve as it's important to balance the equality at that point.

 

Any issues are more likely to be related to location or race nights as opposed to existing conflicts I'd assume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy