CardinalSin Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 First and foremost Baldy, you HAVE to win your home meetings, that's vitally important and for me Risager is a slightly stronger rider around Foxhall. As I said, they're both pretty much on a par with each other, and Lanham has also had his fair share of away stinkers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScotsman Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 League winners I reckon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 First and foremost Baldy, you HAVE to win your home meetings, that's vitally important and for me Risager is a slightly stronger rider around Foxhall. As I said, they're both pretty much on a par with each other, and Lanham has also had his fair share of away stinkers. I agree there us little on track to differentiate the 2 - perhaps Morten a bit more hot and cold. But I would say the biggest bone of contention is that it appears Morten upset the applecart with his attitude and that required a team order change that did us no favours at the sharp end of the season. If that issue is sorted then all well and good. I think we will be up there again challenging for a play off spot. Still see Worky as favourites so far. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 (edited) First and foremost Baldy, you HAVE to win your home meetings, that's vitally important and for me Risager is a slightly stronger rider around Foxhall. As I said, they're both pretty much on a par with each other, and Lanham has also had his fair share of away stinkers. you do have to win at home and as you can see I put we will go unbeaten at home, that's why I would prefer Leigh for away meetings to get some extra points. We obviously both have different opinions which is good. Looking forward to next season, bring it on. So who has ideas on team riding order? Can we put morten back to 3 or 4 and put Tungate at 5 Edited December 5, 2013 by Baldyman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semion Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 Looks a hit or Miss team to me. Lets hope for all those Suffolk boys who have been straved of success in both Football and Speedway terms that it is more hit than miss.. Play-offs then another disappointing end For the Ipswich Nearly men. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 you do have to win at home and as you can see I put we will go unbeaten at home, that's why I would prefer Leigh for away meetings to get some extra points. We obviously both have different opinions which is good. Looking forward to next season, bring it on. So who has ideas on team riding order? Can we put morten back to 3 or 4 and put Tungate at 5 Put Morten at 5 again, then with the reserves beating him in 3 races, and a tough time in 13 he will soon be down to reserve and a trump card! Worrall Manzares Tungate Heeps Risager Ellis Hawkins I'd like it if the highest ave rider didn't have to ride at 1, being put at 5 is better as they ride the 3 races with the reserves. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 Heeps at 5 for me all day. How good was he at 2 in heat 1. Would be the making of the lad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenga Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 like that team if that is the riding order.. tungate and heeps if they are paired together may get in each others way.. .. could be silverware coming to ippo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 Doesn't look anything special really.... Then again none of the teams declared yet dont. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 Doesn't look anything special really.... Then again none of the teams declared yet dont.universal mediocrity - the watchword of modern Britain some would say!like that team if that is the riding order.. tungate and heeps if they are paired together may get in each others way.. .. could be silverware coming to ippo.maybe the Anglian Cup! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 universal mediocrity - the watchword of modern Britain some would say! maybe the Anglian Cup! Not that bad... Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalSin Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 (edited) I agree there us little on track to differentiate the 2 - perhaps Morten a bit more hot and cold. But I would say the biggest bone of contention is that it appears Morten upset the applecart with his attitude and that required a team order change that did us no favours at the sharp end of the season. If that issue is sorted then all well and good. I think we will be up there again challenging for a play off spot. Still see Worky as favourites so far. But is that true though? Mortem has gotten a rough ride on here because of that. There was a post on here labelling Risager as a "billy big balls" because he apparently caused a rift in the camp. One poster if I can recall posted that, then it seemed to escalate and snowball. The knives seem out for Risager and I'm not 100% it's justified? Looks a hit or Miss team to me. Lets hope for all those Suffolk boys who have been straved of success in both Football and Speedway terms that it is more hit than miss.. Play-offs then another disappointing end For the Ipswich Nearly men. Well hopefully we get written off as we did last year both on here and the speedway star who most had us finishing outside the play offs. We did end up finishing second, just behind Somerset on the final heat of the final league meeting of the season. Hopefully, we have much better luck with injury than we did when it really mattered. Edited December 5, 2013 by CardinalSin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tcoz88 Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 But is that true though? Mortem has gotten a rough ride on here because of that. There was a post on here labelling Risager as a "billy big balls" because he apparently caused a rift in the camp. One poster if I can recall posted that, then it seemed to escalate and snowball. The knives seem out for Risager and I'm not 100% it's justified? I don't think it is 100% justified but i do believe Rohan had implied that he was a bit fed up of Morten cutting him up. My preferred riding order would be 1 Richie Worrall 2 Gino Manzares 3 Morten Risager 4 Cameron Heeps 5 Rohan Tungate 6 Adam Ellis 7 Ritchie Hawkins reserves can be swapped over but wouldn't make much difference. reason for morten at 3 means he has inside gate at home and cam has outside gate in 14. could maybe swap them for away matches for the same reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalSin Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 I don't think it is 100% justified but i do believe Rohan had implied that he was a bit fed up of Morten cutting him up. So harsh in the extreme! You get that in every team up and down the country! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 But is that true though? Mortem has gotten a rough ride on here because of that. There was a post on here labelling Risager as a "billy big balls" because he apparently caused a rift in the camp. One poster if I can recall posted that, then it seemed to escalate and snowball. The knives seem out for Risager and I'm not 100% it's justified? Well hopefully we get written off as we did last year both on here and the speedway star who most had us finishing outside the play offs. We did end up finishing second, just behind Somerset on the final heat of the final league meeting of the season. Hopefully, we have much better luck with injury than we did when it really mattered. Perhaps it is a bit harsh on him and in general many of my posts last season said as such. However there was an order change and it was down to that rift and results seem to indicate it unbalanced the team sonewhat. Like you say that sort of thing happens at many clubs but we dont need it again. Im sure all involved are mature enough to put it aside and get on with doing what needs to be done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIAMONDS Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 Worrall didn't get reduction for Diamonds last year so why this year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalSin Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 However there was an order change and it was down to that riftWas it?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 Worrall didn't get reduction for Diamonds last year so why this year?I think he did. 5.78 - but started on 5.64 didnt he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bash Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 Was it?? Yes it was, as I was told by a couple of our riders at Rye House the meeting before the changes took effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Stewart Posted December 5, 2013 Report Share Posted December 5, 2013 I don't understand why anyone would be anything but delighted with that Ipswich team. They were a close second last year and have replaced Barker and Lanham with Worrall and Manzares. Pretty good, definitely challengers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.