dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted November 28, 2013 Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 hmmm Has Louis messed up by signing Worrall, as it seems that he will be doubling down and Belle Vue fixtures will take priority....... Many PL sides will have the same problem with the shift on the ruling. It has to be right that the owning club gets priority though. Better to have him for 24 out of 28 than not at all I say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevePark Posted November 28, 2013 Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 hmmm Has Louis messed up by signing Worrall, as it seems that he will be doubling down and Belle Vue fixtures will take priority....... I am sure, with so many in the same 'boat' the fixtures will be compiled with this in mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted November 28, 2013 Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 Many PL sides will have the same problem with the shift on the ruling. It has to be right that the owning club gets priority though. Better to have him for 24 out of 28 than not at all I say. 4 meetings? Could be more than that......2 home and 2 away in the EL so depending on the fixture list: 2 x Thursday (Belle Vue @Swindon) (either Ipswich home matches or Redcar/Sheffield away) On a friday the Witches could be at Edinburgh / Plymouth / Scunthorpe / Somerset 2 x Friday ( Belle Vue @ Lakeside) 2 x Friday (Belle Vue @ Coventry) On a Saturday the Witches would be away at Berwick / Rye House / Workington 2 x Saturday (Belle Vue @ Eastbourne) 2 x Saturday ( Belle Vue @ Leicester) Thats possibly 10 meetings out of the 28 or 36% of the matches! Suppose we will see......................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewbacca Posted November 28, 2013 Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 I'd have Lanham an Newcastle. Rides Brough Park very well and pretty dependable away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted November 28, 2013 Report Share Posted November 28, 2013 (edited) I am sure, with so many in the same 'boat' the fixtures will be compiled with this in mind. But thats the problem, lots will be in this "boat" but now there are different rules, at least before it was the PL had priority and everyone knew that, now its the club that "owns" the rider which is fair but what if the rider is owned by one club and needed by another 2? eg: Richie Worrall - Belle Vue (EL) have priority over Ipswich (PL) Cameron Heeps - Ipswich (PL) would have priority over an EL club Josh Auty - assuming he signs for Birmingham again (EL) also signed for Scunthorpe (PL) But who takes priority as i believe "owned" by Coventry!? Edited November 28, 2013 by 2ndbendbeerhut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted November 29, 2013 Report Share Posted November 29, 2013 On a different note, I see Manzares won a meeting in Australia, beating rohan and Doyle in the final, yes it was on a small track, but beat some good riders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted November 29, 2013 Report Share Posted November 29, 2013 On a different note, I see Manzares won a meeting in Australia, beating rohan and Doyle in the final, yes it was on a small track, but beat some good ridersI dont do Twitter but was told a couple of days ago he had tweeted that he had agreed a PL. But where?..... I'd have Lanham an Newcastle. Rides Brough Park very well and pretty dependable away. I hope Leigh gets sorted out soon. The problem for him (and many others) is he is in that funny average range. It always seems to be that 6-7 type rider that juggled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montie Posted November 29, 2013 Report Share Posted November 29, 2013 But thats the problem, lots will be in this "boat" but now there are different rules, at least before it was the PL had priority and everyone knew that, now its the club that "owns" the rider which is fair but what if the rider is owned by one club and needed by another 2? Josh Auty - assuming he signs for Birmingham again (EL) also signed for Scunthorpe (PL) But who takes priority as i believe "owned" by Coventry!? Scunny i believe get first call over Josh unless he signs for Coventry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted November 29, 2013 Report Share Posted November 29, 2013 I dont do Twitter but was told a couple of days ago he had tweeted that he had agreed a PL. But where?..... I have looked at his twitter and I can't see anywhere he has said that, apart from someone else saying he should find a UK team asap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted November 29, 2013 Report Share Posted November 29, 2013 Like I say dont do it myself - just a hearsay comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowboy cookie returns? Posted November 30, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Manzares has tweeted that he has some big news in the the next few days.........A yank at Foxhall that would be cool but will it happen?? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonny the spud Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 At the moment any news from foxhall would be good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalSin Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 According to a very reliable source, the Witches 1-7 is already in place. Just a matter of when the club decide to announce it! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 According to a very reliable source, the Witches 1-7 is already in place. Just a matter of when the club decide to announce it! .At the moment any news from foxhall would be goodIf both the above are correct then either Adam isnt in or dont play poker with Jonny!! Personally I hope Jonny is good at poker. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Not like the witches to be late giving the fans news updates ! :-) workington seem to have the team to beat so far.. ...... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2ndbendbeerhut Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Does Richie Worrall qualify for a British reduction? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Thumb Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 (edited) Does Richie Worrall qualify for a British reduction? On Belle Vue thread they are saying(hopeing) he does for EL, so you would think if that was the case then he would qualify for PL reduction. Edited November 30, 2013 by Tom Thumb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldyman Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 I didn't think they done British reduction in the premier? Or have they suddenly brought that back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil The Ace Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 Howarths got a reduction for Workington so should imagine so will Richie for you as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iandean3 Posted November 30, 2013 Report Share Posted November 30, 2013 I expect the team to be announced this coming week, so that season tickets can be sold at the supporters club AGM. Just checked my cheque book stubs and I wrote out the cheque on 12-12-12, which if memory serves me correctly is where I paid last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.