Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Rider Size, How Much Does It Matter?


Recommended Posts

Arthur Browning was a big lad and he did alright :)

he was about 8 foot tall with legs that could extend an extra couple of foot when he went into the bends.

He used to cover the inside with his extendable legs so nobody could go under him.

 

So the answer to your question is yes. :rofl:

 

He was actually six foot four, a powerful broad-shouldered athlete. He must have been quite heavy.

He is exactly the same age as me, nearly 69 now :sad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't say both Darcy and Chris are short, and Niki Pedersen and Kenneth Bjerre are certainly not tall. Works both ways. But personally i would say Jason Crumps size would be right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've not seen Giant Haystacks or Big Daddy ride in the Elite League. This must prove that riders weighing over 30 stone wouldn't get an Elite League place.

 

Probably only as a Number Ate.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Powell the former Glasgow Tiger appeared to have telescopic legs.

Very difficult to get by on the inside of him without both wheels crossing the white line.

 

Other advantage for 'big' riders - no worries in the post-meeting shower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Powell the former Glasgow Tiger appeared to have telescopic legs.

Very difficult to get by on the inside of him without both wheels crossing the white line.

 

Other advantage for 'big' riders - no worries in the post-meeting shower.

 

Oooohhhhh - is THAT what they mean by 'Telescopic Leg'? I hadn't realised. :blink:

 

Silly me. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Powell the former Glasgow Tiger appeared to have telescopic legs.

Very difficult to get by on the inside of him without both wheels crossing the white line.

 

Other advantage for 'big' riders - no worries in the post-meeting shower.

 

 

I think for that you need to look at the size of their feet not the general corporal size :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arthur Browning was a big lad and he did alright :)

he was about 8 foot tall with legs that could extend an extra couple of foot when he went into the bends.

He used to cover the inside with his extendable legs so nobody could go under him.

 

So the answer to your question is yes. :rofl:

 

Thing is though how better would his results have been if he hadn't been 'handicapped' by his extra weight compared to the other horses ooops riders in a race. We've established a burly biker can race a speedway bike but at what weight does it strongly affect his ability to race on equal terms?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw plenty of fat guys in the 70s who could gate, pass, defend a line, team ride and do just about anything else a skinny guy could do half as better.

Perhaps nowadays the technology favours the thin and superfit but those fat, smoking, boozers used to entertain the hell out of the crowd when I was young.

 

Maybe if these guys had been thinner and fitter and had not drank as much or puffed on as many ciggies they would have been world champions but the chunky unfit speedway rider was an enetertainer as much as the fit skinny blokes. :rofl:

Edited by pandorum
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Within certain parameters it makes little difference. A riders will set his bike up with this in mind. Possibly somewhere between 8.5 - 9 stone as a minimum and 11 - 11.5 stone as an upper limit. Outside those parameters then a rider may well be hampered.

 

We have of course seen successful riders from the other side of both those limits but not many.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From memory, he was about average height, but must have weighed getting on for 20 stone.

 

Yes. I too remember Tiny White and I think you're under estimating his size and weight, I would put another couple of inches and another couple of stone on that, I think he could have eaten Ronnie Russell for a snack. Don't remember him ever beating anybody though, last every time by at least a quarter of a lap. Give him credit for trying though, must have really loved the sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is though how better would his results have been if he hadn't been 'handicapped' by his extra weight compared to the other horses ooops riders in a race. We've established a burly biker can race a speedway bike but at what weight does it strongly affect his ability to race on equal terms?

 

I'd add another angle to the debate, and that's that a rider with "decent" body mass and inherent strength that goes with it, may well be able to withstand the bumps and bangs of racing a lot better than the "will'o'the whisp" riders. Compare Arthur Browning's (lack of an) injury record with that of someone like Adam Roynon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd add another angle to the debate, and that's that a rider with "decent" body mass and inherent strength that goes with it, may well be able to withstand the bumps and bangs of racing a lot better than the "will'o'the whisp" riders. Compare Arthur Browning's (lack of an) injury record with that of someone like Adam Roynon.

 

Arthur Browning picked up one or two injuries during his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy