Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Sgp/bsi And Sec/one Sport It Is War Now


Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

i assume someone is not riding in the GPs next year then?

WHY assume that?

 

There is a FIM Conference this weekend, more talks, and hopefully a resolution.

 

All the GP riders have booked their flights, etc, to NZ.

My own view (and it is nothing more than that) is that even if the FIM still rule that GP riders cannot also compete in the SEC, the riders will start the SGP series and contest it in some form or another before the SEC actually commences.

 

Hard to see how the FIM can impose this restriction having allowed riders to do both in 2013. They are trying to shut the stable door after the horse has bolted but, as stated before, this is as much about an internal power struggle in Geneva as anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk about shooting yourself in the foot. Absolutely ridiculous decision.

 

The SGP is the best speedway events EVER. why risk destroying the biggest draw the sport has known??????

 

Plain Crazy...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hasn't expanded much beyond Europe (and not to Russia), charges host venues too much, poor prize money, relatively closed shop...

 

Obviously some think they can do better.

Only thing One Sport has done so far is copypaste the SGP on the cheap. So who are you talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hasn't expanded much beyond Europe (and not to Russia), charges host venues too much, poor prize money, relatively closed shop...

 

Obviously some think they can do better.

 

I agree with all those things. I was referring to the racing spectacle when I said it was the best ever and is a wonderful advert for the sport.

 

The FIM is like the Mafia, and what they say governs. The argument is all about money. But too make riders choose between the two is creating a disaster area that the sport can ill afford.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see a rival world championship happening if this isn't sorted as with what happened with Darts - money talks and riders will go where the money is .

RIDERS still need FIM international licences to race in more than one country so not sure that the analogy with darts is a valid one.

 

Hypothetically ... if OneSport were to operate a championship outside of the FIM where would the riders find sufficient employment if they were banned from Denmark, GB and Sweden for example?

 

I agree with all those things. I was referring to the racing spectacle when I said it was the best ever and is a wonderful advert for the sport.

 

The FIM is like the Mafia, and what they say governs. The argument is all about money. But too make riders choose between the two is creating a disaster area that the sport can ill afford.

NO great fan of the FIM per say but not sure calling them the Mafia is valid. They are the global governing body of motorcycle racing and the custodians of the various championships. Would, however, agree with your last comment...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RIDERS still need FIM international licences to race in more than one country so not sure that the analogy with darts is a valid one.

 

Hypothetically ... if OneSport were to operate a championship outside of the FIM where would the riders find sufficient employment if they were banned from Denmark, GB and Sweden for example?

NO great fan of the FIM per say but not sure calling them the Mafia is valid. They are the global governing body of motorcycle racing and the custodians of the various championships. Would, however, agree with your last comment...

If all the top riders from those countries did ride in an outside championship and faced a ban what would stop the federations of those countries ignoring the FIM and running there own meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hypothetically ... if OneSport were to operate a championship outside of the FIM where would the riders find sufficient employment if they were banned from Denmark, GB and Sweden for example?

The point is that I don't think they could be banned for competing in a championship outside of the FIM - or unlikely stand up in court if challenged.

 

The SGP contracts might themselves have 'exclusivity' clauses that may preclude where else riders may compete, but again if riders are otherwise competing all over the place, it's pretty hard to argue they can't ride in the SEC.

 

NO great fan of the FIM per say but not sure calling them the Mafia is valid. They are the global governing body of motorcycle racing and the custodians of the various championships.

The Mafia charges 'affiliated businesses' fees in return for not very much, and also has legitimate fronts to give them respectability. How does the FIM really differ in practice?

 

It's funny though, how the nonsensical UEM they created a few years ago has come back to bite them.

Edited by Humphrey Appleby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With FOGO pulling out as one of the main sponsors and there's got to be a chance there will be others, and NICE threatening to pull out from sponsoring the Polish riders, the FIM could very well end up with a GP series that is virtually worthless if the top riders decide to go with the European Champs rather than the GPs.

Decisions like this one from the FIM will only lead to conflict and court cases, which means the only ones likely to profit out of this will be the lawyers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With FOGO pulling out as one of the main sponsors and there's got to be a chance there will be others, and NICE threatening to pull out from sponsoring the Polish riders, the FIM could very well end up with a GP series that is virtually worthless if the top riders decide to go with the European Champs rather than the GPs.

Decisions like this one from the FIM will only lead to conflict and court cases, which means the only ones likely to profit out of this will be the lawyers.

Alternatively you let OneSport trample over the sport taking up more valuable weekend dates and taking more rider from weekend British tracks.

 

I say kill it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen a number of posts on Facebook saying Emil Sayfutdinov has now officially withdrawn from the GP series.

 

What an absolute mess these lunatics are making of the sport forcing riders to choose.

 

Alternatively you let OneSport trample over the sport taking up more valuable weekend dates and taking more rider from weekend British tracks.

 

I say kill it now.

Were there any riders from weekend British tracks there last year or due to be there this year?

Only I think 3 of SEC last year rode in the UK and none from Brit weekend tracks.

I don't really think we are important enough to formulate any kind of policy regarding this speedway spat sadly.

 

How are OneSport trampling over the sport?

Providing valuable TV coverage and some interesting TV speedway.

Can't the GP and SEC just live together it's not like speedway has any great worldwide popularity.

Surely the SEC creates interest that might rub of on other sections of the sport.

Edited by pandorum
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy