Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

New Rider For Sheffield


Recommended Posts

Woodward looked like a class act last night, but I wouldn't be upset if it was Lewis Bridger and I think a spell on a big fast track might help him (and Team GB) for the future. I'm also sad to see the end of Richard Hall at Sheffield because when he was 'on it', there was no finer sight in speedway. Still, missing Rye House was perhaps the final straw for many people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a number 1,guests are ok for a couple of meetings but not for rest of season,We need to get back to a regular 1-7.Plenty of meetings next month so could do with sorting before next Thursday if possible.Is there a cut off date for signings in august or is that only for teams that might win something to stop glory hunting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that it is the result of a series of unfortunate events. Firstly Rich injures his shoulder in a crash that wasn't his fault, then probably comes back too early. As a consequence his points scoring isn't as good as it had been. Meanwhile his Long Track performances are improving. 7th in Finland I think, 4th in Norway. Has a storming meeting v Newcastle at home in the League cup (hooray!) then goes to Newcastle, slides off in his first ride and withdraws with said shoulder injury again. Then his facebook page is full of pictures and the story of his road trip to Marmande for the Bastille Day GP which he wins (hooray!). Now 3rd in the Long track standings with 3 to go. Returns to Sheffield with a fanfare, and promptly gets excluded for exceeding 2 mins when allegedly his clutch lever drops off before his first heat. Manages to get to 6 points and Sheffield lose. To Rye House. Again. He then takes the P155 by showboating on his long track bike after the meeting. Next he "injures" himself unloading his bike and withdraws from the away trip to Rye House. Meanwhile there's a popular rider, keen as mustard who WANTS to ride for Sheffield available who will do as good a job, without the grief of Long Track, a niggling injury and a complete disregard for the fans'/promotion's feelings when their team loses.

 

I suspect that this season may see a couple more changes, with another under achiever injuring himself falling off a mountain bike surely on the radar. With a new number one required , and the likes of MPT on the sidelines, surely there have to be more changes soon???

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MPT for joe might be a good move.Feel sorry for joe though,when he gates he looks really quick but doesn't seem to be on the pace when last.Probably something to do with all the injuries hes had.Its a shame because he was such a good young talent.As for getting a new number 1 !!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think Stan's hit the nail on the head. It was quite obvious from Neil Machins programme notes on Thursday that he'd had a fall out with Rich Hall over his withdrawal from the away meeting at Rye House. Especially after he had a poor meeting at home against them on the Thursday before! It looked quite obvious after that meeting where Halls priorities are - a couple of laps on his speedway bike and two outings on the long track machine.

Well good luck with the long track series Rich, you'll have more time to spend on it now!

 

As for a number one, Cameron Woodward looked really good the other night - top quality - but he was riding for his country - just hope he would reproduce that week on week. Not Lewis Bridger as I've already said.

 

MPT for Haines, could be a case of pot & kettle! Although Haines is still struggling would Palm-Toft be any better? Obviously he's not had the form he finished with last year, otherwise Rob wouldn't have ditched him. However if we replaced Haines I don't think many would be surprised or upset the way he's been riding lately, would they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here you go, hope it helps.

 

 

SHEFFIELD Speedway would like to clarify the circumstances behind the departure of Richard Hall from the club last Thursday with the following statement:

On the afternoon of Friday July 19 we were informed by Richard’s father that he would not be at Rye House on the 20th, a sick note was not submitted until we were on route to Rye House the following day.

This note declared Richard unfit for work for 7 days which prevented him riding until Friday July 26 - this of course ruled him out of Team GB last Thursday and was communicated to the Team GB Manager and Richard on Monday July 22.

The Sheffield and Glasgow promotions met at Rye House to discuss the possibility of extending the loan of Andre Compton at a time when Simon Stead, Joe Haines, Damien Koppe and Richard Hall were all missing through injury and a decision was taken not to extend the loan.

Richard’s injury had also caused a withdrawal at Newcastle and he had informed us that he was struggling to cope with the tighter circuits consequently a decision was reached to rest him bearing in mind the forthcoming fixtures at Newcastle, Edinburgh, Plymouth and Ipswich.

Andre Compton was not available to be included in a team change request until Thursday July 25, this was submitted with the following reason given, “Richard Hall’s performance hampered by a recurring shoulder injury, we reserve the opportunity to re-introduce Richard once fully fit”, this is a direct quote from the official application form.

Permission was subsequently granted, circulated electronically by the authorities to clubs at 15.48 and seen by us at around 17.00, the time that Richard would be expected to be on route to Owlerton.

It has subsequently transpired that a source close to another club breached the confidential nature of the document and chose to confirm the team change on a well known internet forum between 18.00 and 19.00 prior to Richard’s arrival, we were not aware of this until the following day.

On Friday July 26 we received a continuation sick note for a further four weeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BSPA have issued the new averages, and changes in clubs' 1-7's.

 

At Owlerton, it is definately a new 1-7. Richard Hall out, Andre Compton in.

 

Guilty as charged then!

 

Lulu is correct. The new 1-7 is Stead, Roynon, Wells, Haines, Compton, Albin and Koppe, but not applicable until Sunday, so will be R/R for Hall at Leicester I guess.

There again this could be Guilty as Charged as it is confirming the previous post! Either way if team changes are confidential how the hell did they get out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably because they effect Glasgow and they announced it? http://www.glasgowtigers.co/?p=2537

 

So that begs the question what right have Glasgow got announcing Sheffield team changes before Sheffield do so and probably before Sheffield have had the opportunity to speak with all the riders involved? Fairly unprofessional by Glasgow isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not the first time Glasgow have made an official announcement that they probably shouldn't have. Anyone remember a certain court case last year where one of the defendants was supposed to be anonymous yet the Glasgow press release gave away exactly who it was (without directly naming him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking at that press release it appears Glasgow are not at fault, all they have done is announce their changes and kept the fans in the loop as to why the changes occurred, they gave the reason andre left them as to save face with the fans, maybe a little communication between the respective promoters could have saved a few red faces at our end.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

looking at that press release it appears Glasgow are not at fault, all they have done is announce their changes and kept the fans in the loop as to why the changes occurred, they gave the reason andre left them as to save face with the fans, maybe a little communication between the respective promoters could have saved a few red faces at our end.

Maybe they did but Glasgow chose to ignore the protocols usually observed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of Glasgow or Sheffield had to be the first to announce that Andre was swapping teams though, so why not Glasgow?

Can't see what Glasgow have done wrong here. Simply announced their team change. Did Sheffield ask them to stay silent? No i don't think so. Perhaps some actual dialogue between Sheffield an Richard Hall may have helped.

 

Simple it is unprofessional of Glasgow to make this announcement in the way they did. All they had to do was co-ordinate the announcement with Sheffield to avoid any embarrassment. If they didn't want to do that they could have just stated that Andre Compton's loan was not being extended; what they had no right to say was that "The move has come about due to Sheffield wishing to recall Andre Compton to their side". Surely it is the Sheffield managements job to make this announcement?

 

The more I think about it this is actually quite malicious by Glasgow; did they want to lose Compton, probably not, so they thought they'd cause a few ructions for the Sheffield Promotion. Not a nice way to behave and unfair on Richard Hall to find out his fate from this forum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not necessarily disagreeing with you elephant man but more playing a sort of devils advocate. Everyone knew it was happening even though neither club had stated it - it was Sheffield fans who were first to say it, another forum even had the name of the Sheffield rider to be dropped on it. Glasgow had to make a change - one some think they had been working on for a while, perhaps even before the 28 days but I dont know about that.

 

Thing is, Glasgow HAD to make their change public when they did as they had a fixture coming up and had to submit their team to the oppo in accordance with the rules. So if they HADNT announced Anders, THEIR fans would have found out from elsewhere so they looked after their own fans.

 

I think its harsh to say it was malicious - I think its been a case of two clubs not really thinking things through. Glasgow were perhaps a bit naive in not realising that could happen, Sheffield perhaps negligent (the Sheffield promotion have been in the game a lot longer after all) but I wouldnt think either meant things to happen the way they did.

 

I fully agree it was wrong that Richard Hall found out from a source other than the Sheffield management what was happening.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy