Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Leicester Vs Ipswich Pl 12/5/13 6pm


Recommended Posts

A positive, intelligent post from a Leicester fan. Quick, have it stuffed, these are very rare.

 

I agree, the intellegent posts from people with positive views of Leicester have, up to this week, been very rare for good reason. Up until this week there has been nothing positive to talk intellingently about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what did we learn from Sunday?

1, the track is not as crap as some would like us to believe.

2. What a massive blow loosing Adam Roynon was. If he was fit, I think away results would have been better and the conference of the whole team would be better. And we would still have the same 1-7 riders.

3. The crowd level was down due to the weather not anything else.

4. We have a greater toilet capacity in the gents. Lol.

5. After a very entertaining meeting with bags of overtaking, some still moan.

Come on you Lions fans, lets get behind the lads and turn this situation around.

 

1. It would seem not, lets hope it stays that way!

2. Absolutely

3. I don't agree, only this year has poor weather resulted in such poor crowds. The lack of entertainment on view is surely a factor when choices are made with meetings in poor weather.

4. Still not tried it. I appear to be having a second coming with regards to bladder control!

5. Who's moaning?

 

Mick.

Edited by volty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of falls in the opening heats suggests the work wasn't what you'd call "good"

Riders fall for various reasons and not all attributable to the track. Settting up a bike for what was a track with dirt on it is an art that seems to being lost these days. It is easier now just to grade it, take the dirt off and ride on a main road.

The falls by the Ipswich riders in heat 2 were in my opinion because they were trying things that weren't possible so early on that sort of track.

Edited by Great Central
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Riders fall for various reasons and not all attributable to the track. Settting up a bike for what was a track with dirt on it is an art that seems to being lost these days. It is easier now just to grade it, take the dirt off and ride on a main road.

The falls by the Ipswich riders in heat 2 were in my opinion because they were trying things that weren't possible so early on that sort of track.

 

A track should be (safely) ride-able by all straight out of the box, yes there is such a thing as home track advantage but this is mainly down to knowledge of the best lines to ride and such, not by having a track surface prepared so one team can stay upright and the visitors can't.

That is what would be considered dangerous and it's no surprise the track work was ordered before somebody got hurt.

 

Safety has to come first.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dangerous it certainly was not. It had dirt on it and therefore needed riding with a different technique. Not the rubbish or bust style shown by Ipswich in the first two heats. The track man is fine but just looked a bit peed off seeing all his good work go to waste.

 

Having dirt on is ok if evenly put on but this track was patchy which especially with rain falling on and off WAS dangerous!!! Im just glad no riders were injured because they could easily have been. If the track man had done his job in the first place and it was a well prepared track, the Witches would undoubtedly have won! By your comment of "track mans good work going to waste" I take it he wanted the Witches riders to fall off and for the Leicester riders who know the track much better to have an avalanche of a win!!! Lets face it, when the track was fair to both teams, the Witches came storming back and you and your fellow supporters (including the gob almighty ones) did not like it and could not take the fact that the Witches really were the better team, given fair circumstances :approve:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if they were the better team like you say jackal then your beloved witches would of won simples,as it was they didn't so what does that tell you? don't come back at me with "when the track was fair for both teams" dont forget its a gate and go track its just you had the better gates later on in the meeting which allowed you to pull it back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if they were the better team like you say jackal then your beloved witches would of won simples,as it was they didn't so what does that tell you? don't come back at me with "when the track was fair for both teams" dont forget its a gate and go track its just you had the better gates later on in the meeting which allowed you to pull it back.

 

You more or less answered your own question neb!!! "When the track was fair to both teams" Witches won by the country mile, so they WERE the better team :approve:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You more or less answered your own question neb!!! "When the track was fair to both teams" Witches won by the country mile, so they WERE the better team :approve:

the fact is win you did not if it makes you feel better lets say you finished second or runners up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy