Blazeaway Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Is BFD taking drugs?that explains why he talks Bollocks!! What's your excuse?!!! Just kidding, hope you beat them pesky Pirates! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatDave Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Not for the first time your talking absolute bollocks ! Not for the first time you and your cronies are attacking the Poster not the Post, but of course we won't let a few forum rules get in the way of a good rant, eh? Just because 95% call it one way doesnt mean theyre right . Certainly agree to disagree - thats part of what this forum is about. So long as it is a genuine opinion and not just an inflammatory wind up then everyones entitled. Particularly the 95% of posters on this thread, who let their hatred get the better of them. This whole thread was started as a deliberate wind-up simply because the Original Poster 'doesn't like' Chris Holder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Blue Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 I still don't understand why Pedersen laid his bike down in the semi when he had half a chance of winning the race , beats me why he did it ! Lucky to be in the rerun after giving Chris nowhere to go and falling off ! Took Lindback out as well , just dirty ! Shocking refereeing to allow him in the rerun . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Just going back to the referee bottling it, and making a decision that at least three international riders seemed to suggest was wrong (Tatum, Ermolenko and Sullivan), is it time to do what F1 now do for the GPs and have an ex rider involved in such decisions, at least for the semi's and finals? no...just someone with Bottle!! Btw just had a text from babs.....she says would have excluded Lindback!! I still don't understand why Pedersen laid his bike down in the semi when he had half a chance of winning the race , beats me why he did it ! Lucky to be in the rerun after giving Chris nowhere to go and falling off ! Took Lindback out as well , just dirty ! Shocking refereeing to allow him in the rerun . sh!te bait Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r8gdp Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 1st bend bunching both riders not giving an inch they touch going into the corner. Causing holder to straighten up as a result running Into pedersen right call by the ref 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazeaway Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 no...just someone with Bottle!! Btw just had a text from babs.....she says would have excluded Lindback!! sh!te bait I would have excluded Crump personally... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dump that clutch Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Not for the first time you and your cronies are attacking the Poster not the Post, but of course we won't let a few forum rules get in the way of a good rant, eh? Particularly the 95% of posters on this thread, who let their hatred get the better of them. This whole thread was started as a deliberate wind-up simply because the Original Poster 'doesn't like' Chris Holder. Tell me BFD.... if NP was in red, and CH in blue, a total complete role reversal....would you be saying the same? If your answer is yes...you really need to look in a mirror. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arson fire Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Not for the first time you and your cronies are attacking the Poster not the Post, but of course we won't let a few forum rules get in the way of a good rant, eh? Particularly the 95% of posters on this thread, who let their hatred get the better of them. This whole thread was started as a deliberate wind-up simply because the Original Poster 'doesn't like' Chris Holder. no?? It's about the refs call, you always try turn things into slander by playing the country of origin card....it's boring BFD.....after the umpteenth time in a week 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lino wolf Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Not for the first time you and your cronies are attacking the Poster not the Post, but of course we won't let a few forum rules get in the way of a good rant, eh? Particularly the 95% of posters on this thread, who let their hatred get the better of them. This whole thread was started as a deliberate wind-up simply because the Original Poster 'doesn't like' Chris Holder. what you going to tell us next ? The west indies lucky to win the semi final against Australia ? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruckerroo Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 No doubt nicki rode the man not the track. Wasn't there a rule you had to go 30 yards straight before turning left and pole axing the rider on your inner Nicki needed to be another wheel length in front to pull that move tbf As for the ref I spose he took the easy option . Well done to Chris on a deserved title Well done to crumby for a great gp career Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheReturn Posted October 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Not for the first time you and your cronies are attacking the Poster not the Post, but of course we won't let a few forum rules get in the way of a good rant, eh? Forgive me for butting in on a private squabble, but Dave, how do you have the audacity to post this after calling fans on here scum? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruckerroo Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Crumpy ffs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stratton Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 What's your excuse?!!! Just kidding, hope you beat them pesky Pirates! I ent on anything Blazeaway ! I've had a few beers tonight won a little bit on Holder the PIrates are the favourites but we have a fighting chance?What are the prices? i recon it might be 10/11 Poole Evs Swindon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheReturn Posted October 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Particularly the 95% of posters on this thread, who let their hatred get the better of them. This whole thread was started as a deliberate wind-up simply because the Original Poster 'doesn't like' Chris Holder. Are you for real? I was attacking the referee for bottling it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Ref got it right - first bend bunching; all four back. Some folks need to take their blinkers off - I see a few familiar Aussie-haters on here. It's nothing to do with being an Aussie. Get the chip of your shoulder. As i've posted on another thread, at 2.24(ish), what is Holder meant to do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obrien48 Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 Tell me BFD.... if NP was in red, and CH in blue, a total complete role reversal....would you be saying the same? If your answer is yes...you really need to look in a mirror. I would say all 4 back would be the right call 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dump that clutch Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 I would say all 4 back would be the right call you....mirror...now.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robinsgirl Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 There have been similar instances many times in speedway that have had more initial room into the corner that have been called 'all 4 back' With the importance of the meeting, the ref made the right decision. Nikki was only just in front and clamped heavily and Chris had so little time to react that the bunching incident occurred. I'm sure this one will be debated heavily but that's my view from what I have seen. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontforgetthefueltapsbruv Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 No doubt nicki rode the man not the track. Wasn't there a rule you had to go 30 yards straight before turning left and pole axing the rider on your inner Never been a rule - its one of those urban myth thingies!! The 30 yard marker I believe relates to receiving assistance after the start. Im sure someone with a rulebook can clarify! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obrien48 Posted October 6, 2012 Report Share Posted October 6, 2012 you....mirror...now.... In truth I would have been calling for Nikki's head had that been in reverse, I've watched him try to put so many people in the fence this GP series, get away with it calling it 'hard racing' and yet whinge when someone had the audacity to give him some back. For once, his antics went against him and it happened to be against the guy he was competing for the World title with... better luck next time Nikki. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.