500cc Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 What facts are these? A story in the local paper from Peterborough is from one side - I'll wait for the claims to be corroborated or disputed by the other parties! Fair point. The problem is that Janet Mahoney has been directly quoted by the paper. If this is not true she needs to do something fairly quickly as rightly or wrongly this will now be treated as Peterborough's view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spencebel Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 Her name is Julie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crump99 Posted January 5, 2013 Report Share Posted January 5, 2013 (edited) What facts are these? A story in the local paper from Peterborough is from one side - I'll wait for the claims to be corroborated or disputed by the other parties! And then you'll come to a balanced decision without bias. Will look forward to it! Good to see that we were not allegedly denying Andersen a living as you kept saying (I think the Coventry part probably also applied to Iversen? ) “Coventry were prepared to buy Hans on a full transfer if they were able to tempt him to ride for them in 2013, but Hans also turned that move down" & “We have subsequently put two offers to Hans, both of which he has chosen to decline." - perhaps that will be clarified at your end? What's that supposed to mean? I don't mean that in a sarcastic way by the way. I'm just not sure what angle you're coming from. Balanced and sensible without the emotive language! Edited January 5, 2013 by Crump99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g13webb Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 (edited) Good to see that we were not allegedly denying Andersen a living as you kept saying (I think the Coventry part probably also applied to Iversen? ) “Coventry were prepared to buy Hans on a full transfer if they were able to tempt him to ride for them in 2013, but Hans also turned that move down" & “We have subsequently put two offers to Hans, both of which he has chosen to decline." - perhaps that will be clarified at your end? When I read the rules on loaned out riders, I am of the impression, at the end of each loaned stint, the parent club has first option on that rider next year. If that parent club doesn't take up that option, then the Club the rider was loaned to has second option of that rider.... So where does the RULES say that Peterboro' can offer the said rider to another club (COVENTRY) before they have given the loan club the opportunity to have him back....... Is that not braking the rules ????? Edited January 6, 2013 by GRW123 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz01 Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 When I read the rules on loaned out riders, I am of the impression, at the end of each loaned stint, the parent club has first option on that rider next year. If that parent club doesn't take up that option, then the Club the rider was loaned to has second option of that rider.... So where does the RULES say that Peterboro' can offer the said rider to another club (COVENTRY) before they have given the loan club the opportunity to have him back....... Is that not braking the rules ????? No because Coventry were willing to buy them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
em1500uk Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 Balanced and sensible without the emotive language! Thanks for that. Sorry for being a bit dim I just wasn't sure if it was meant as an arsey comment or whether it was meant to be a compliment of sorts. I find it hard to tell online! I do think you have to watch what you say on here anyway as you never know who might be reading and I personally don't want to make myself look like a complete idiot! I try and be fair and reasonable and think outside of my own box. There's always several sides to one story. But sadly not everyone on here thinks like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g13webb Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 No because Coventry were willing to buy them. Probably so, but surely, according to the said rules, Swindon should've had first option to buy......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woz01 Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 Probably so, but surely, according to the said rules, Swindon should've had first option to buy......... I understand that Swindon only wanted to loan Hans originally? Could be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluPanther Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 When I read the rules on loaned out riders, I am of the impression, at the end of each loaned stint, the parent club has first option on that rider next year. If that parent club doesn't take up that option, then the Club the rider was loaned to has second option of that rider.... So where does the RULES say that Peterboro' can offer the said rider to another club (COVENTRY) before they have given the loan club the opportunity to have him back....... Is that not braking the rules ????? No, he was not offered to coventry on a loan basis, it was a full transfer or maybe swap for Harris. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Rabbit Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 When I read the rules on loaned out riders, I am of the impression, at the end of each loaned stint, the parent club has first option on that rider next year. If that parent club doesn't take up that option, then the Club the rider was loaned to has second option of that rider.... So where does the RULES say that Peterboro' can offer the said rider to another club (COVENTRY) before they have given the loan club the opportunity to have him back....... Is that not braking the rules ????? Maybe you can point us to where you read these rules because I was under the impression that these particular 'rules' are in a handbook available to promoters and other officials rather than in the rules of the sport available to all on the SCB website. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickyb Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 Nicki Pedersen to ride in Tomas Topinkas farewell meeting in March Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tastethepoison Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 Nicki Pedersen to ride in Tomas Topinkas farewell meeting in March Source? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagpuss Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 See 'Testimonial, Individuals & Shared Events' section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickyb Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 It's on BSPA site Sorry I meant speedway 365 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickyb Posted January 6, 2013 Report Share Posted January 6, 2013 Sorry again I was right the first time it's BSPA site 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semion Posted January 7, 2013 Report Share Posted January 7, 2013 I know we start our Home meets with the TTT. Any news coming out yet on who we kick our league season of against, and when ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickyb Posted January 7, 2013 Report Share Posted January 7, 2013 I think you will find that is Peterborough home and away on Good Friday 29th of March Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
semion Posted January 7, 2013 Report Share Posted January 7, 2013 If thats the case can see us only starting with 6 points out of a possible 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans fan Posted January 7, 2013 Report Share Posted January 7, 2013 If thats the case can see us only starting with 6 points out of a possible 7 in your dreams Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelvinht Posted January 7, 2013 Report Share Posted January 7, 2013 NKI will be doubling 'across' between both teams taking no.1 rides for both the panthers and the stars. Where no.1 riders race in the same race the team that owns th asset takes preference, the other team gets to bring in a guest replacement for those races...except in heat 15 where his points are halved and laps 1 and 2 count for Peterborough, laps 3-4 for the Stars..... Think thats what the latest rule change says.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.