Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Premier League Best Pairs


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 263
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Looks like, Berwick, Scunthorpe, Newport and Ipswich miss out.

 

Plymouth get in because there top 2 still on assessed averages? so wrong!!!

 

If this is right, wot a load of crap,team most local= Newport,team who would bring a good load of support = Newport, team who would have won it = Newport.

qualification for this is laughable, BSPA = DICKHEADS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is right, wot a load of crap,team most local= Newport,team who would bring a good load of support = Newport, team who would have won it = Newport.

qualification for this is laughable, BSPA = DICKHEADS

 

Would have to be Lanham and Aspergen for Newport as the others (Doyle, Sedgeman and Gjedde) haven't rode enough matches for Newport. Agree with most you say, all teams should get a chance IMO AND any rider(s) who represents that team. As stated before there is way's to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it cant be beyond the wit of man to include every PL team in this meeting,seed some teams through to the main event then let the rest qualify through a mini-meeting.

 

It looks like being another BSPA shambles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in the least bit interested in the PL Pairs this year. I would've been tempted with the pairing of Doyle & Frampton though... No, for me it will be a nice quiet Friday night at the Walkabout in Cardiff :P

I'll be at the Pairs but there's an NL meeting at Newport; Hornets V Heathens, if you need a Speedway Fix, Shadders. Are you getting to Cardiff in time for the Practice? :drink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have to qualify first, not 100% sure we will make it.

 

But with Doyle being superb around the OTA and Sedgmen in good form and also a rider who rides the OTA well, you'd have to fancy them to do well if they took part although Lanhams come into some form and the two meetings I witnessed at the OTA last year, Somerset Vs Newport in the PT and SBT, Lanham was superb and was passing the likes of Gathercole. You can also rely on a fair few Wasps fans making the trip over if they take part.

 

There would be 4 of us going if the Wasps rode

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With only 2wks to go until the PL Pairs at Somerset, I guess it's a little too much to hope if anyone would know the contesting teams for the event??? Not that anyone would be attending of course!!!!!!

 

How long will we have to wait for the confirmed line-up?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it cant be beyond the wit of man to include every PL team in this meeting,seed some teams through to the main event then let the rest qualify through a mini-meeting.

 

It looks like being another BSPA shambles.

See my post above. Pass it on to BSPA. You never know they might just ignore it :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See my post above. Pass it on to BSPA. You never know they might just ignore it :-)

 

It's beyond a joke now, 2 weeks until the biggest meeting before cardiff and still the teams aint announced! what a joke the BSPA are, even after the shambles with coventry and peterborough they still don't learn!

 

supporters will probably be wanting to sort out travel arrangments for coaches or by car etc to attend this meeting and yes still left waiting whether there team is represented or not,

 

Shame on you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely its in the best interests of the sport to include Newport's Doyle and Gjedde. Doyle would of raced at least 6 meetings for the Wasps by then, as well as around 10 for Rye House so has a valid PL ave and Gjedde will have raced at least 3 meetings for Newport by then and also had a valid PL CMA.

 

Those pair would challenge for honours, leaving them out is daft.

 

I agree all sides should be included, have a mini tournament before the main event. It includes 4 extra sides so more chance of more fans travelling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely the following is possible: two groups of four pairs and two groups of three pairs, thus allowing all 14 teams to be represented. Winners throgh to semi-finals. By my reckoning, that's 6+6+3+3+3=21 heats.

 

All the best

Rob

read the earlier post by topsoil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like, Berwick, Scunthorpe, Newport and Ipswich miss out.

 

Plymouth get in because there top 2 still on assessed averages? so wrong!!!

 

 

 

right enough then. what a joke.

 

Nowt to do with ben barker then?

 

His average 9.50 with the next best being lee smart on 5.81??? confused.

Edited by penchev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely the following is possible: two groups of four pairs and two groups of three pairs, thus allowing all 14 teams to be represented. Winners throgh to semi-finals. By my reckoning, that's 6+6+3+3+3=21 heats.

 

All the best

Rob

 

Way too sensible Rob! Rethinking my plans for that night now. I've enjoyed the event for the last two years as a neutral but not sure I want to fork out for a PL event without my team in it. Really disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

read the earlier post by topsoil

 

Too many heats in Topsoil's proposal. They barely have enough time for the current 23 races before Somerset's curfew - try to put on 25 races and there would be a risk that the final doesn't get completed. :shock:

 

But it's perfectly possible to involve all 14 teams in just 21 races, as I've outlined.

 

All the best

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GROUP 1

RYE HOUSE

GLASGOW

LEICESTER

NEWCASTLE (Mark Lemon, Stuart Robson)

WORKINGTON

 

GROUP 2

SOMERSET

SHEFFIELD (Ricky Ashworth, Shane Parker)

PLYMOUTH

EDINBURGH

REDCAR

 

Further rider confirmations will follow shortly. Teams are able to pick any 2 or their top 3 CMAs as at June 1, 2011.

 

Taken from the BSPA site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy