Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Rolling Averages


Recommended Posts

I still stand by my view in that if you raced in the EL, you achieved that average to be converted by 1.4 for team building purposes as you raced under that race format, f you want to continue in the, now, Premiership.

 

If you only have a PL average, then that was achieved in the present race format, which is to be used in 2017.

 

For 2017 in the Premiership, once an average has been achieved using the 4H 4A system then a conversion factor of 1.25 is applied (Premiership/Championship = 50/40 = 1.25) for rolling averages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That doesn't address the situation where after so few meetings some riders will be on false averages. Similar happened last year where some draft riders had an 8+ average after the first few meetings..

 

Granted, reserves have tougher rides in the new (old) format, but if some teams have cannonfodder at #7 is it quite possible that some reserves could put two or three points on their average in the first 8 meetings.

 

Another change that doesn't seem to have been thought through.

But my propsal does stop teams replacing riders who get an artificially high average from riding at reserve with a better rider. As they still need to be under 43 points. Basically that rule would discourage teams from "tactical syrengthening" mid season.

 

Tbh, back in the 80s you didn't have rolling averages and it worked fine.

I see your point and that lower limit will be in place it seems but I was looking at a different point.

 

If a side were to lose each of their first 4 away matches by say 20/30 rather than 10 then the redeclaration will have more flexilbility whatever the limit is.

 

With a 'brand new' average being acheived from those first 8 meetings rather than a rolling 20 the impact of any reduction would be greater.

Well yes. That could be done. I recall Cradley doing it in 84 in order to fit simon cross in. But then batch did it with rolling averages in effect in 2015 for Swindon so ward could be fitted.

Tbh I'm not sure how u avoid that though, without using rolling averages with a complicated conversion method.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But my propsal does stop teams replacing riders who get an artificially high average from riding at reserve with a better rider. As they still need to be under 43 points. Basically that rule would discourage teams from "tactical syrengthening" mid season.

But you are also penalising teams who might lose a heatleader to injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what they are saying is that the difference between a Premiership side & a Championship side is replacing a 2 point rider for a 4 point rider between the two leagues.

 

There would not be a "cat in hell's" chance there would be a fair challenge between the 2 sides from differing leagues wether a challenge or end of season promotion/relegation play-off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 6 months later...

I would imagine rolling averages will be back in place and take into account 2017 meetings.

 

But how many meetings will be used and will the League Cup fixtures count in the Championship....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Final averages now out for both Premiership & Championship Leagues.

 

For teambuilding purposes, will the 1.2 conversion be used between Leagues if only rode in one?

 

If a rider has ridden in both leagues, what average will be used now they have ridden to the same race format?

 

Any rider not in that list but has ridden in the old racing format still have the 1.4 conversion applied(even though it did not apply to Musielak & THJ in 2017, possibly Lahti also but unsure)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Has there been any confirmation that rolling averages will return and if so the number of meetings to be used etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that the one rider over eight rule hasn't yet (if it ever will be) been confirmed and assessed averages still seem very much up in the air, the answer is who knows.

 

Anyway I doubt if anything will be confirmed until the second week of January (at the earliest).

Edited by arnieg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed arnieg everything still seems up in the air - I just couldnt recall seeing any indication either way about the return or otherwise

To not bring rolling averages back would be another backward step for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers Gambo

Can see some teams in the Championship using the League Cup to manipulate changes for the main event of a play off push then :cry: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On ‎26‎/‎12‎/‎2017 at 9:47 PM, Gambo said:

As far as I am aware, Rolling Averages will start in 2019, using 2018-2019 stats.

I am not aware of the reasoning behind this, so please don't shoot the messenger! :rolleyes:

Apparently, there has now been a *U-Turn/*Rethink/*Clarification (*delete as appropriate) regarding the Green Sheets.

2017 averages WILL be included this year for a 20 match Rolling Average.

Riders who do not have a 2017 average will maintain their starting average until they have completed 4H & 4A.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Gambo said:

Apparently, there has now been a *U-Turn/*Rethink/*Clarification (*delete as appropriate) regarding the Green Sheets.

2017 averages WILL be included this year for a 20 match Rolling Average.

Riders who do not have a 2017 average will maintain their starting average until they have completed 4H & 4A.

The right decision in order to remove/reduce the impact of any attempt of manipulation

One that shouldve been made in November however better late than never!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the new list it must be that shield matches have been included as well after all

Eg Danyon Hume had 7 2017 meetings (hence still assessed at 2) but on new list he has 10 meetings included which can only be the 3 shield meetings prior to the cut off date

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Looking at the new list it must be that shield matches have been included as well after all

Eg Danyon Hume had 7 2017 meetings (hence still assessed at 2) but on new list he has 10 meetings included which can only be the 3 shield meetings prior to the cut off date

You are correct. Championship Shield matches are included in the Rolling Average. :t:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy