Gemini Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) Sorry I still don't get it. Who is the No. 1? Unless you mean K.K. who isn't. And I think you may be jumping the gun yourself because Belle Vue and Peterborough haven't even completed their teams yet so how do you know they haven't got a No. 1? Edited December 23, 2010 by Gemini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces51 Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) Sorry I still don't get it. Who is the No. 1? Unless you mean K.K. who isn't. And I think you may be jumping the gun yourself because Belle Vue and Peterborough haven't even completed their teams yet so how do you know they haven't got a No. 1? Whether it is true or not I don't know but who of the riders on 8+ is left after KK signed for B'ham? Harris, Zagar and A....... Thinking about it, it doesn't seem likely because B'ham were given permission to talk to Andersen, hardly likely if he had alraedy signed for Coventry. Edited December 23, 2010 by Aces51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemini Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 Is that last one AJ? He was supposed to be after a return to E.L. racing so sorted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aces51 Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 Is that last one AJ? He was supposed to be after a return to E.L. racing so sorted. If it was AJ that wouldn't tie in with Steve's comment that it leaves BV and P'borough without a No.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Rabbit Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 Thinking about it, it doesn't seem likely because B'ham were given permission to talk to Andersen, hardly likely if he had alraedy signed for Coventry. Andersen could well have agreed a deal with Coventry since Panthers had agreed a deal with Bjerre before the AGM. Birmingham could have been given permission to talk to him after the AGM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 (edited) Is that last one AJ? He was supposed to be after a return to E.L. racing so sorted. Lakeside turned him down Gem, they saw Richardson as a better prospect! Edited December 23, 2010 by Jacques Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 Andersen. Coventry signed Andersen and Harris. Only they can't use both even though they have signed both. Unless they will be the only team with two number ones above 8 while two clubs won't have one. Probably the cause of the Trump tantrum at the AGM. Larsen? Pawlicki? Andersen? its a conspiracy I tell 'e!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans fan Posted December 23, 2010 Report Share Posted December 23, 2010 Andersen could well have agreed a deal with Coventry since Panthers had agreed a deal with Bjerre before the AGM. Birmingham could have been given permission to talk to him after the AGM. this could get even more messy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hans fan Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 Andersen. Coventry signed Andersen and Harris. Only they can't use both even though they have signed both. Unless they will be the only team with two number ones above 8 while two clubs won't have one. can't see the problem myself if both want to ride for coventry if there under the 40pt limit it will make them weaker in other places. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffster Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 Not difficult to work out. And the reason for all the rumpus. By the sound of it Coventry jumped the gun twice. Once with Larsen, then a deal with another rider. BV and Peterborrough have no number one, yet Coventry have two. Fair, eh? "By the sound of it Coventry jumped the gun twice" So, YET AGAIN, no CONCRETE PROOF, eh Steve? Still, not the first time, and it certainly wont be the last, that you post as yet unproven allegiations against teams other than your beloved Pirates ! You couldn't make it up....Except it seems, you can ! How are Matt and you communicating these days? Phone, Fax, Email, Telepathy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Rabbit Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 Not difficult to work out. And the reason for all the rumpus. By the sound of it Coventry jumped the gun twice. Once with Larsen, then a deal with another rider. BV and Peterborrough have no number one, yet Coventry have two. Fair, eh? Jumped the gun? Some would say they merely beat another team to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffster Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 Jumped the gun? Some would say they merely beat another team to him. Come on now, Barney ! Havent you realised that only Poole are allowed to do such things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Blachshadow Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 And the reason for all the rumpus. Larsen, they beat another team to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 "By the sound of it Coventry jumped the gun twice" So, YET AGAIN, no CONCRETE PROOF, eh Steve? Still, not the first time, and it certainly wont be the last, that you post as yet unproven allegiations against teams other than your beloved Pirates ! You couldn't make it up....Except it seems, you can ! How are Matt and you communicating these days? Phone, Fax, Email, Telepathy? I thought it was by two plastic cups tied with a piece of string!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pollyanna Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 From what I can gather both Coventry and Peterborough have been excepted back into the fold but there is a problem with one club not happy at all about what has gone on. Might be beacuase their team plans have been ruined with know no number one or a rule change. Expect an announcement on the 4th January. Perhaps just another rumour! Whoever told you this is bang out of order - and I know it is not Matt Ford. Wait until the official announcement please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pollyanna Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 Bloody Poole again. Why blame Poole collectively, when only one person has posted this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pollyanna Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 Think Shovlar and co are getting there collective wires crossed when Matt texts them what to put on the great BSF.... Believe me, he doesn't!! Whoever is taking to SS, it isn't Matt Ford! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatDave Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 (edited) Whats an Epitaph!!! ..........it's what Seth Efricans call a Cheerful Welshman, Starman. Edited December 24, 2010 by BigFatDave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ipswich Jules Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 How are Matt and you communicating these days? Phone, Fax, Email, Telepathy? Pillow talk..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyluck Posted December 24, 2010 Report Share Posted December 24, 2010 Perhaps just another rumour! Whoever told you this is bang out of order - and I know it is not Matt Ford. Why get so worked up about "perhaps just another rumour"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts