Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Coventry 99 % Certain To Be In Elite Next Season Acording To Sandu


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I keep looking at the proposed teams for various clubs and I think that at their next meeting the BSPA should consider a re-branding of the product because "Elite" doesn't really fit :unsure:

It will be re-branded as the Dilute League.

I have set up a company called Go2Seed and I have exclusive rights to the Dilute League as well as the tv rights with Comedy Central.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be re-branded as the Dilute League.

I have set up a company called Go2Seed and I have exclusive rights to the Dilute League as well as the tv rights with Comedy Central.

 

Well I've just heard BBC Radio Cambs sport and Bratters was reported to have said that it's too late to reorganise the EL? So if that's the case then we'll certainly trial your suggestion :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After all that has gone on over the past few weeks, maybe now would be the perfect time for Terry Russell to look for a League sponsor. How about him trying EX-LAX ? :wink:

 

I thought that the idea was to stem the losses or are you suggesting that what's so far proposed will loosen the EL up so they'd be a perfect partner :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought that the idea was to stem the losses or are you suggesting that what's so far proposed will loosen the EL up so they'd be a perfect partner :unsure:

 

 

If that is the case, maybe try BISTO as a sponsor then. It wont stop it, but mighten thicken it up a some. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what you mean but it's really immaterial now. The EL has the minimum 8 teams it needs (it could have been 10 but hey ho) so as we stand the EL can function in 2011. The BSPA could dig its heels in now and make no compromise of any sort if it wanted. When outnumbered 8 to 1 it leaves Coventry in a very difficult position.

It could have functioned with less than 8 teams but by doing so it would not have received anything from Sky TV whether it be money or even any live TV showings. I am led to believe that the money is in the region £100k per team so it must have been all hands to the wheel to sweet talk King's Lynn into doing a sudden 360.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if you're going to cherry pick the riders we have trained up and nurchered and throw money and gifts at them its hardly our fault is it! :unsure:

But have they cherry picked? Did not the 2 riders they currently have want away. One of them actually left to gain experience on a bigger track before ending up at Brandon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what you mean but it's really immaterial now. The EL has the minimum 8 teams it needs (it could have been 10 but hey ho) so as we stand the EL can function in 2011. The BSPA could dig its heels in now and make no compromise of any sort if it wanted. When outnumbered 8 to 1 it leaves Coventry in a very difficult position.

Yet another forum member who seemingly claims to have been at the BSPA agm,and knows everything that transpired there.So who else got an invite?I presume Matt's faithful lapdog from Sherborne was lying at his master's feet,and one would guess Tsunami would have been there to take the minutes.Perhaps Coventry and Peterborough walked out,because they were unable to get a seat. :unsure:

You like so many others seem to have this obsession with the 8:1 or 7:2 vote democracy rules ok,like its the holy grail.Presumbably you were perfectly content with Mugabe winning his election in Zimbwabe,after all he got over 85% of the vote in the 2nd round.Trouble was his opponents risked being murdered if they didn't vote for him.It is doubtful if an independent judiciary would have declared the results as just.

No one has ever doubted how the votes went,it is the events that led upto that point,that is in dispute.The fact remains that you, like everybody else on this forum doesn't truly knows what went on.The only thing we really know is that Coventry and P'boro were sufficiently angered to walk out,and are sufficiently confident in their position to instigate legal proceedings.

Edited by houdi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet another forum member who seemingly claims to have been at the BSPA agm,and knows everything that transpired there.So who else got an invite?I presume Matt's faithful lapdog from Sherborne was lying at his master's feet,and one would guess Tsunami would have been there to take the minutes.Perhaps Coventry and Peterborough walked out,because they were unable to get a seat. :unsure:

You like so many others seem to have this obsession with the 8:1 or 7:2 vote democracy rules ok,like its the holy grail.Presumbably you were perfectly content with Mugabe winning his election in Zimbwabe,after all he got over 85% of the vote in the 2nd round.Trouble was his opponents risked being murdered if they didn't vote for him.It is doubtful if an independent judiciary would have declared the results as just.

No one has ever doubted how the votes went,it is the events that led upto that point,that is in dispute.The fact remains that you, like everybody else on this forum doesn't truly knows what went on.The only thing we really know is that Coventry and P'boro were sufficiently angered to walk out,and are sufficiently confident in their position to instigate legal proceedings.

 

Very well put

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet another forum member who seemingly claims to have been at the BSPA agm,and knows everything that transpired there.So who else got an invite?I presume Matt's faithful lapdog from Sherborne was lying at his master's feet,and one would guess Tsunami would have been there to take the minutes.Perhaps Coventry and Peterborough walked out,because they were unable to get a seat. :unsure:

You like so many others seem to have this obsession with the 8:1 or 7:2 vote democracy rules ok,like its the holy grail.Presumbably you were perfectly content with Mugabe winning his election in Zimbwabe,after all he got over 85% of the vote in the 2nd round.Trouble was his opponents risked being murdered if they didn't vote for him.It is doubtful if an independent judiciary would have declared the results as just.

No one has ever doubted how the votes went,it is the events that led upto that point,that is in dispute.The fact remains that you, like everybody else on this forum doesn't truly knows what went on.The only thing we really know is that Coventry and P'boro were sufficiently angered to walk out,and are sufficiently confident in their position to instigate legal proceedings.

 

I'd love to know how many Cov and Pet fans were present when King's Lynn and Birmingham supposedly received their backhanders. Well I'd suggest it was ZERO. Doesn't seem to stop them making disgraceful accusations.

 

In the meantime the rest of us are entitled to give our less outrageous opinions about what may or may not have occurred at the AGM.

 

Thank you.

Edited by eastern wolf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A thought just occurred to, might as well chuck it in here as anywhere else...

 

If Andersen, Kasprzak & Zagar decide not to ride in the EL this season, that leaves Birmingham and Belle Vue without a "number one" (over 8pts) rider - would Kings Lynn and Swindon be ordered to release Iversen and Stead (the next highest riders) to fill that gap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A thought just occurred to, might as well chuck it in here as anywhere else...

 

If Andersen, Kasprzak & Zagar decide not to ride in the EL this season, that leaves Birmingham and Belle Vue without a "number one" (over 8pts) rider - would Kings Lynn and Swindon be ordered to release Iversen and Stead (the next highest riders) to fill that gap?

 

Hopefully not Alan, we would not want either of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

****sigh****

 

NO Starman - it is NOT the Play Offs - I said a different Competition A LEAGUE CUP (containing the Teams that would have been in the Play Offs had there been any).

 

My idea was to stop all of this hostility by having TWO Competitions. The League Championship (Won by the Team collecting most Points over a Season) and The League Cup which would be competed for by the top six or eight Clubs.

 

Two Trophies = a possibility of TWO seperate Winners. Now, at present, there can only be one Winner - and - that is what is causing all the trouble here - as far as I can see.

 

I am only trying to get a positive argument aceross to stop people feeling robbed of their rightful place as League Champions. I am offering a way that the top Teams can play each other for a Trophy SEPERATE to the League Championship.

 

This way it would stop CVS, Mr. Ford, Mr. Sandhu and Mr. Trump or anyone else for that matter cribbing because they lost the Play Offs.

 

I give up. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

I don't know why Starman is having a go at you as you seem to be defending Poole to a degree, and for what it's worth I agree with what you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

carnt belive 30 pages on a crap statement that is full of wishfull thinking.Wake up and smell the roses it Aint going to happen :rolleyes:

 

 

and you know that for certain do you mate, i would not be so sure cause there could be egg on your face by the end of the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy