Pirate Nick Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 Then why dont you copy and paste the post and send it to them , I'm sure Matt Ford would like know how you have single handedly made his club and the supporters of it totally despised by hundreds of forum members and speedway fans alike I wouldn't think M Ford or 99% of the poole fans give a toss what the 1% of speedways fans across the country that use this forum think at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beeone Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 I agree but he is not still involved in the running of a club. Sorry but there is right way to announce club news and whatever you may think of anyone else its NOT through Facebook Not really sure what this has to do with that bloke anyway. Its Rossiter that was the unprofessional one or would you be happy that all yoru clubs PR is done through Facebook I can't believe that people actually took Rosco's bait. He was taking the michael, pulling ones leg, extracting the urine, it was a wind up for God's sake, why would a speedway club be signing a national hunt jockey???!!!!!!??? His facebook post read along the lines of 'for the BSF and Shovlar, have signed AP on a four pointer', Now if he had announced an actual signing on facebook then sure it would be unprofessional, but this was just a joke!! Regards, Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirates Of Poole Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 Get over myself!!! I think you need to take a look at the Posts of some of your compatriot Supporters on here. I have never read so much vicious bile in all my life. Mostly, it must be said, from Poole Supporters. Obviously, to me anyway, all this bitterness towards Coventry must come from somewhere. I can only assume that most of the Poole Supporters are very bitter about losing the Play Offs - I know I would be. Granted Coventry were the better Team over the two leg Final - BUT - League Champions - I don't think so. My way would solve that problem - can YOU think of anything better??? Remember Speedway is a great Family Sport - we, it's Supporters should be all pulling in the same direction to end all of this friction. This rubbish isn't why I go to Speedway - I go for the love of it, the excitement and most of all the companionship of ALL Supporters no matter who they may support. The clubs new the rules at the start of the season. Plain and simple the winners of the playoff final will be champions. Poole lost Coventry won, weather it stays around next year i would probably think so but im getting fed up with people who keep taking digs. Everything should be resolved by this time tomorrow either way and if Cov and Pet are in thats great for speedway i will be happy with that as the more clubs the better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 I can't believe that people actually took Rosco's bait. He was taking the michael, pulling ones leg, extracting the urine, it was a wind up for God's sake, why would a speedway club be signing a national hunt jockey???!!!!!!??? His facebook post read along the lines of 'for the BSF and Shovlar, have signed AP on a four pointer', Now if he had announced an actual signing on facebook then sure it would be unprofessional, but this was just a joke!! Regards, Martin Ha ha some people are just plain thick mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 (edited) The clubs new the rules at the start of the season. Plain and simple the winners of the playoff final will be champions. Poole lost Coventry won, weather it stays around next year i would probably think so but im getting fed up with people who keep taking digs. Everything should be resolved by this time tomorrow either way and if Cov and Pet are in thats great for speedway i will be happy with that as the more clubs the better. Agree. All everyone wants is two more clubs to join the 8 confirmed. However neither club should benefit whatsoever over the other 8 clubs because of a threatened law suit. Edited December 19, 2010 by Steve Shovlar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedibee Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 No one has said that Cov were not deserved champions. However the loophole which was exploited by Cov to ultimately defeat Poole had to be closed. cov defeated poole by being better at speedway than they were . no loopholes were needed or used for that. however the same cannot be said of poole winning the league by such a large points margin . now they had their cake and choked on it in 2010 . and we should have been allowed to have ours in 2011 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krytens Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 most of the decent fans from all leagues could see why Kings Lynn were enticed into the elite league and how without their actions at the eleventh hour this whole situation would have had to be resolved 4 weeks ago . I have never seen so many moronic comments come from one area .Stop blaming other people all the time take a good look at yourself and try to help the situation rather than " Its their fault Its Their fault nothing to do with us " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirates Of Poole Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 No a law suit shouldn't been used to force the hands of rules already put in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 cov defeated poole by being better at speedway than they were . no loopholes were needed or used for that. however the same cannot be said of poole winning the league by such a large points margin . now they had their cake and choked on it in 2010 . and we should have been allowed to have ours in 2011 . The loophole allowed Pawlicki to score 26 +2 from reserve!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essaitch Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 No a law suit shouldn't been used to force the hands of rules already put in place. The simple answer to which is to stay within the law, and not think you can bully and threaten people to get what you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 Are you really that pathetic. If you read my Post properly - you would see that I suggested a Competition made up of those who had qualified for the Play Offs - in simple language, so you can understand: the Teams who are under the current Play Off System would play in a seperate Competition. It COULD be called the League Cup. The Trophy (Cup) would be competed for by the Teams over the SAME NUMBER OF MATCHES as the Play Offs. Had it been in operation THIS Season - Poole would be League Champions and Coventry would be League Cup Winners. Now I have tried to explain things as simply as I can to you - as I see them. NOT "mad" just an alternative viewpoint to yours. I could call you a lot of names too Starman2006 - but what would that achieve??? Even MORE hostility on here. I think there is enough of that already - dont you??? Still classed as the play off's, whats the bloody difference. And you call me pathetic!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc61 Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 while i can understand everones concern saying that one club shouldnt benefit by using the law, what would everyone actually then say if we were to find out that the one club was actually right and something was wrong. we dont as yet know the full details of what this legal case is supposed to be. i posted earlier a rumour which starman commented on. the rumour being that panthers walked out because rik frost wasnt allowed to vote despite being told earlier he could due to the reasons for peter oakes absence. now just supposing this was correct would people still think panthers would be wrong to resort to the law when their business in their mind is being treated unfairly. i did hear this in the pub so it could be complete codswallop but what if there was some truth in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 (edited) while i can understand everones concern saying that one club shouldnt benefit by using the law, what would everyone actually then say if we were to find out that the one club was actually right and something was wrong. we dont as yet know the full details of what this legal case is supposed to be. i posted earlier a rumour which starman commented on. the rumour being that panthers walked out because rik frost wasnt allowed to vote despite being told earlier he could due to the reasons for peter oakes absence. now just supposing this was correct would people still think panthers would be wrong to resort to the law when their business in their mind is being treated unfairly. i did hear this in the pub so it could be complete codswallop but what if there was some truth in it If Frost was not allowed to vote it would have been because he is not a member of the BSPA. Only members would be allowed to vote in any organisation, and would he would not be able to challenge that in a court of law if the BSPA rules state members only. Edited December 19, 2010 by Steve Shovlar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedibee Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 So, for the last three weeks you've been banging on about the situation being Matt Ford / Poole's fault. This week it's all King's Lynn's fault that Coventry are out of the Elite League. You're so blinded you've been stung in both eyes by your promotion. YOUR PROMOTION ONLY HAVE THEMSELVES TO BLAME. <unnecessary personal abuse removed> It appears that coventry are not out of the elite league and it looks like peterborough as well. and if you could read properly you would be able to see that all I have accused Kings Lynn of is prolonging the dispute by allowing themselves to be used as pawns in the Bspa's game against coventry and peterborough , now that kings lynn are surplus to requirements it wont be long before you are bleating how the bspa have turned you over by letting peterborough have the riders back that you have signed . stung in both eyes by the very people you tried to help ................<unnecessary personal abuse removed> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogstar Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 (edited) If Frost was not allowed to vote it would have been because he is not a member of the BSPA. Only members would be allowed to vote in any organisation, and would he would not be able to challenge that in a court of law if the BSPA rules state members only. But if it was agreed he could vote by proxy...? Divine that is and I believe he had good reason for not attending. Edited December 19, 2010 by Dogstar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc61 Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 If Frost was not allowed to vote it would have been because he is not a member of the BSPA. Only members would be allowed to vote in any organisation, and would he would not be able to challenge that in a court of law if the BSPA rules state members only. you only ever read what you want to read. maybe due to circumstances peter oakes was told he didnt have to attend and rik frost could vote instead. it could be crap , it could be right i dont know. but it must be crap because you have decided it is, just like every other poster on here is wrong if they say something you dont agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc61 Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 If Frost was not allowed to vote it would have been because he is not a member of the BSPA. Only members would be allowed to vote in any organisation, and would he would not be able to challenge that in a court of law if the BSPA rules state members only. you only ever read what you want to read. maybe due to circumstances peter oakes was told he didnt have to attend and rik frost could vote instead. it could be crap , it could be right i dont know. but it must be crap because you have decided it is, just like every other poster on here is wrong if they say something you dont agree with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Rabbit Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 If Frost was not allowed to vote it would have been because he is not a member of the BSPA. Only members would be allowed to vote in any organisation, and would he would not be able to challenge that in a court of law if the BSPA rules state members only. I understand there's a three year qualification period before a promoter can vote. That being the case, and bearing in mind Peter Oakes' situation, the case suggested by Doc61 might - just might - be a possibility for action. Why not answer him rather than comment that Mr Frost might not even be a member of the BSPA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 Don't be so arrogant. If I stalked your posts I'd be on here all day. It's a forum so sometimes I respond to what someone has posted but more often than not I don't bother. Amazingly you have just picked my posts and name checked me out of accident then. Ill have a word with Sandhu`s lawyers to see if they deal with stalkers. Merry Christmas to you tho. It seems you have that the wrong way round! According to Mr. Sandhu's statement of 10th December, it was Coventry and Peterborough who offered mediation to the BSPA Depends who you believe. Sandhu said the BSPA offered a way out and he said it was ridiculous. don't disagree with you - but what's a flid?? I just can't make it out... An absolutely disgraceful comment A rather unsavoury slang word for a very stupid or incompetent person. Derived from "thalidomide." Its as poor a word to describe the disabled as the `N` word is for black people. Oh the professionaism of that man Is bleedin Facebook really the place that this sort of thing should come out on. I guess I we should nothing better from him really Doubt its serious From what I have heard Trump stormed out of the building after the BBC changed his seat number. RMFAO See Coventry didn't win Team of the year, or didn't even get a look in, as i said, a block of enpty seats, couldn't be Coventrys could they?? Perhaps they were stopped at the door RMFAO You're so blinded you've been stung in both eyes by your promotion. YOUR PROMOTION ONLY HAVE THEMSELVES TO BLAME. END OF MUPPET Fair point lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedibee Posted December 19, 2010 Report Share Posted December 19, 2010 The loophole allowed Pawlicki to score 26 +2 from reserve!! pawlicki could have scored enough for us to win from any position in the team so that argument really does'nt hold water , fact is poole were not good enough to beat coventry whatever the riding order was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts