Steve Shovlar Posted December 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Pawlicki on 4, I expect. Now THAT would be funny. Though of course it won't be. As its a rider new to the UK he will obviously be assesed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony159 Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Pawlicki on 4, I expect. Really hope not . #Far rather start the season with a fair team . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPete Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Really hope not . #Far rather start the season with a fair team . What would your promotion know about being fair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatDave Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Really hope not . #Far rather start the season with a fair team . Good to start the season with a team to support. That's if there IS a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman2006 Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 If it is about Rules and Regulations, im not interested. If its about the future of Coventry Speedway, as a club, because of noise complaints etc, then not only will i side with the Coventry fans, but i would suspect the whole of the Speedway country would do so. So lets wait and see what the issues are first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted December 7, 2010 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 OK we have had an hour and the first 90 votes. So as that is the amount of points in a normal speedway meeting, the score after the first leg is 49 - 41 to the people who think Sandhu is wrong. An 8 point win to those opposing Sandhu, so fairly comfortable so far. Lets see what the rest of this evening brings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatDave Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 OK we have had an hour and the first 90 votes. Plus two pages of comments, about half of which are either negative or bordering on abusive - seems about par for the course for an EL thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jorson0266 Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Pooles signing that Mr Shovlar is talking about is DENIS ANDERSSON. I repeat DENIS ANDERSSON!!!!! He's a friend of mine on facebook and I met twice last year. Oh never mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrs mark246 Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Well I tried to vote and it said i've already voted, which I haven't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The White Knight Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Not a lot of point to this Steve - there is no Vote for the neutral like me. To say those who are neutral "don't Vote' means quite a few folk are disenfranchised. You never know - they may even be the majority - BUT - we will never know - will we?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Pooles signing that Mr Shovlar is talking about is DENIS ANDERSSON. I repeat DENIS ANDERSSON!!!!! He's a friend of mine on facebook and I met twice last year. Oh never mind. What a pathetic attempt to be a party pooper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatDave Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 What a pathetic attempt to be a party pooper. His club's only been EL for five minutes and already he sounds like an EL Snob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 His club's only been EL for five minutes and already he sounds like an EL Snob. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnieg Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 OK we have had an hour and the first 90 votes. So as that is the amount of points in a normal speedway meeting, the score after the first leg is 49 - 41 to the people who think Sandhu is wrong. An 8 point win to those opposing Sandhu, so fairly comfortable so far. Lets see what the rest of this evening brings. Statistical nonsense Assuming the yes/no vote is a simple binomial distribution with a 50% probability of a yes vote, the standard error of a sample size of 90 would be about 5 and therefore to be statistically significant (at the 5% level i.e 1.96 SEs above the assumed mean of 45/45) would require the vote to be at least 54-36 in one direction or the other before you could draw any conclusion from such a small sample. PS A completely fraudulent question anyway as we don't know what the basis of the legal action(s?) is. Suggest you stop stirring Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BritPete Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Statistical nonsense Assuming the yes/no vote is a simple binomial distribution with a 50% probability of a yes vote, the standard error of a sample size of 90 would be about 5 and therefore to be statistically significant (at the 5% level i.e 1.96 SEs above the assumed mean of 45/45) would require the vote to be at least 54-36 in one direction or the other before you could draw any conclusion from such a small sample. PS A completely fraudulent question anyway as we don't know what the basis of the legal action(s?) is. Suggest you stop stirring If Matt tells him to do something, then it must be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazeaway Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 His club's only been EL for five minutes and already he sounds like an EL snob. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Statistical nonsense Assuming the yes/no vote is a simple binomial distribution with a 50% probability of a yes vote, the standard error of a sample size of 90 would be about 5 and therefore to be statistically significant (at the 5% level i.e 1.96 SEs above the assumed mean of 45/45) would require the vote to be at least 54-36 in one direction or the other before you could draw any conclusion from such a small sample. PS A completely fraudulent question anyway as we don't know what the basis of the legal action(s?) is. Suggest you stop stirring In view of recent voting at the AGM. What do you reckon would be the standard error of a sample size of 9 assuming the yes/no vote is a simple binomical distribution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatDave Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 Subtle edit for accuracy Cuz. Love your work!! In view of recent voting at the AGM. What do you reckon would be the standard error of a sample size of 9 assuming the yes/no vote is a simple binomical distribution. In view of some of the recent comments on the forum I reckon the application of a size 9 Steel-toecap Doc Martins in the correct posterior position on a couple of recalcitrant ex-BSPA members would work wonders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Third Man Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 (edited) more a less a 50 - 50 split, bet that wasnt expected when the poll was started, obviously some supporters are fed up with things as they were Edited December 7, 2010 by The Third Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted December 7, 2010 Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 In view of some of the recent comments on the forum I reckon the application of a size 9 Steel-toecap Doc Martins in the correct posterior position on a couple of recalcitrant ex-BSPA members would work wonders. Luv it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts