Wolfsbane Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Really? Because you don't like what I say?.... No Steve. Because you won't give a straight answer to a straight question. Ever considered Westminster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) No Steve. Because you won't give a straight answer to a straight question. Ever considered Westminster? No obligation to answer anyone on here. Or is there a rule that I have to respond to a particular Coventry poster? I only responded to Colin Cooke because he completely over stepped the mark. Edited October 15, 2010 by Steve Shovlar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) No obligation to answer anyone on here. Or is there a rule that I have to respond to a particular Coventry poster? I only responded to Colin Cooke because he completely over stepped the mark. but i speak the truth which is far more than we've heard from you. Answer the question that you are afraid of. I'm off to enjoy our celebration, bye ,bye loser. Edited October 15, 2010 by colincooke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfsbane Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 No obligation to answer anyone on here...... Totally agree Steve But the next time someone doesn't answer one of yours then........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Totally agree Steve But the next time someone doesn't answer one of yours then........ I can happily live with it. Seems Colin Cooke isn't capable of a proper debate or difference of opinion but would rather go name calling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 No obligation to answer anyone on here. Or is there a rule that I have to respond to a particular Coventry poster? I only responded to Colin Cooke because he completely over stepped the mark. and i have not over stepped any mark so why you choose to ignore a simple question of mine is very strange, I wont loose any sleep over it but will promise to ask the very same question to your face in the future ......looking forward to your response. regards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 and i have not over stepped any mark so why you choose to ignore a simple question of mine is very strange, I wont loose any sleep over it but will promise to ask the very same question to your face in the future ......looking forward to your response. regards. Sorry Mitch I missed your question. What was it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Sorry Mitch I missed your question. What was it? Was the weather nice in Rome.......lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfsbane Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 I can happily live with it. Seems Colin Cooke isn't capable of a proper debate or difference of opinion but would rather go name calling. Time for a sharp exit from me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Was the weather nice in Rome.......lol Yes nice and warm. Hotel great, food fantastic. Sights brilliant though very busy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfsbane Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Yes nice and warm. Hotel great, food fantastic. Sights brilliant though very busy. SS is the new Nero, (average) fiddled while Poole crashed & burned. Sorry Steve, couldn't resist it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) Yes nice and warm. Hotel great, food fantastic. Sights brilliant though very busy. old Roman proverb "Merda taurorum animas conturbit" Edited October 15, 2010 by mitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 old Roman proverb "Merda taurorum animas conturbit" You think CC has brains? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T.N.T. Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 As for TNT I would give it up already, the first example you use basically destroys your arguement as Auty would not be able to double up if he had attained a 9.7 average while riding for Sheffield. You are missing the point .... It was only given as an example RIDER A - Peter Smith - Averages 5.34 doubling up .... Averages 7.98 in the PL RIDER B - Trevor Jones - Averages 3.20 doubling up .... Averages 8.02 in the PL SCB seems to say that SMITH is allowed to double up but Carries a 5.34 average in the EL SCB then says JONES can't double up and if he moves up full time, then he will do so on his 3.20 EL average What I am saying is that the highest average should count, so JONES would move up on an assessed average of 4.01 ... not 3.20 .... thats roughly the situation regarding Auty as SCB seems to think he will be a 3.00 rider in the EL where as I think he would be on half his PL average around 7.70. If you are referring to Kasprzak, he actually replaced Rory Schlien. Heat leader for heatleader. Bridger replaced Sitera, reserve for reserve. Schlein will never be in the same bracket as KK who has GP experience ... Bridger started the season as a heat leader, not a reserve ... so Star Rider for Heat Leader and Heat Leader for dodgy reserve ! Quite frankly I think Rosco in his short time at Coventry has learnt from the Master of the Rule Book, Colin Pratt who knows every trick in the book. According to the rule book, Coventry havent broken any rules and they have built there team to perfection for the run in and I applaud them for that and congratulate them on a job well done. I will say however that I think Pawlicki will be given either a 5.00 assessed average next season or his 6.18 average from 11 matches completed where he rode in 53 races ... thats an average of nearly 5 a meeting and based on averages being set for an average of 4 rides per meeting, he has ridden the amount of races he would have completed in 13 matches ... so that could be seen as having ridden enough rides, regardless of the amount of meetings. Also the 5.00 assessed average may well be given to more new foreigners as the level will be changed to those that have gained a 5+ average in Poland or Sweden instead of the current 6+ average ... should that happen then Pawlicki would be a 5.00 rider just like Grezgorz Zengota and Maciej Janowski were set at Swindon. Whatever his average is, Coventry will be a formidable team again if they can keep KK, Bomber and Pawlicki with possibly Barker and Kennett as a strong top five that will leave 7.00 upto 8.20 for the reserves. Would be good that Coventry and Wolves could only make one change to this years line ups to compete again next season .... Poole have to lose at least two riders !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
castrolargh Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Really? Because you don't like what I say? Don't you believe in other peoples opinion? Or if someone disagrees with yours just ban them? Coventry fans now trying to be the forum police! yea why not, thats what happened to me on a chat room not long ago, the mod was blatantly a Poole supporter and i got banned just for missing out the le from poole , he got the ump, i got banned.Pathetic.Poole supporter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebrum Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Granted he would have missed a few, Quite a few of them are unexplained. So what?? A number 8 can replace a rider ANYTIME You should'nt ask such questions. Coventry would never stoop so low as to fiddle the rules, would they? Its so obvious what has gone on it's undefendable. Bit like Poole`s fiddling last year. Some of you are as bad as each other....Coventry didn't break any rules. They won fairly. Can't we just move on from this now? My god, im agreeing with a Lisa-collette post - NURSE!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE can move on Lisa - its just your one man show that cant - aaaaah, bless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T.N.T. Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Q ~ Isnt there a limit on the number of meetings a #8 can ride in ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBee Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Shovlar, will you be joining us at brandon tonight? We can buy some grapes and wine for you if you like Whatever his average is, Coventry will be a formidable team again if they can keep KK, Bomber and Pawlicki with possibly Barker and Kennett as a strong top five that will leave 7.00 upto 8.20 for the reserves. We can have Auty on a 3.00 as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Q ~ Isnt there a limit on the number of meetings a #8 can ride in ? No. Next TNT made up rule is..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 We can have Auty on a 3.00 as well But why on earth would you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts