stevebrum Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 I agree with you as well. Teams should always field their strongest lineup at all times, but this has obviously not been the case with Coventry and Pawlicki. Is this pointless thread STILL going!!!! Poole should know about fielding dodgy line ups, given the sick note for Screen last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
javw Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 My post there was completely spot on, honest and a fact! No it wasn't Steve , there is no way that Pawlicki could have ridden in all those matches and I think you know it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Steve Shovlar, I did ask you a question yesterday but you have not yet replied ? either you did not read it or understand it ? so i'll try again ? 'Are you allowed within the rules to replace any member of your team with your No8' ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) Dribble, dribble, dribble. SS wouldn't know a fact or honesty if they bit him on the derriere. Well. Are you going to answer the question Mitch has put to you or not. Edited October 15, 2010 by colincooke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemini Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 No it wasn't Steve , there is no way that Pawlicki could have ridden in all those matches and I think you know it! Granted he would have missed a few, but he could easily have ridden more than 12. A Wolves fan posted a list of all the meetings he missed. Quite a few of them are unexplained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemini Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 (edited) God this is so boring. Why don't you answer the question Steve instead of repeating the same thing over and over again. Is there anything in the rules to prevent a team using their number 8 in place of any rider? Edit....so you've changed your post. You'd make a brilliant politician. Edited October 15, 2010 by Gemini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney Rabbit Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Another myth, We first spoke to him about coming here when he had no Polish club, then there was a whole host of reasons why he did not make his debut over here, including the days of national mourning for the Polish President. There has been a legitimate reason for him missing every meeting, and the majority were down to the fact he was obliged to ride in Poland, I believe he actually missed out on qualifying for the Polish under 21 final, yet the Polish federation gave him a widlcard which meant he missed further meetings. Coventry have siffered through not being able to use him dont forget that. I understand what your saying but, after he signed, Coventry had 24 EL matches left, of which he rode only 11 - not 9, not 10, not 12, not 13, but 11. It's that unique number that immediately makes people ask questions. Missing 54% of the matches must make him one of the most unreliable riders over here. I'm pretty sure there was 'a legitimate reason for him missing every meeting' but all the same, missing 13 out oif 24? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 I think someone is on the wind up here and i cant believe so many are taking the bait! Cov won fair and square and within the rules. This must be one of the longest threads about something about nothing. Any way have to get ready for tonights celebrations, think pawlicki should be riding tonight as it won't affect his average Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitch Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 God this is so boring. Why don't you answer the question Steve instead of repeating the same thing over and over again. Is there anything in the rules to prevent a team using their number 8 in place of any rider? Edit....so you've changed your post. You'd make a brilliant politician. Just a simple Question BUT could end all this nonsence !! YES or NO will do ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 I understand what your saying but, after he signed, Coventry had 24 EL matches left, of which he rode only 11 - not 9, not 10, not 12, not 13, but 11. It's that unique number that immediately makes people ask questions. Missing 54% of the matches must make him one of the most unreliable riders over here. I'm pretty sure there was 'a legitimate reason for him missing every meeting' but all the same, missing 13 out oif 24? You should'nt ask such questions. Coventry would never stoop so low as to fiddle the rules, would they? Its so obvious what has gone on it's undefendable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spock29 Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 You should'nt ask such questions. Coventry would never stoop so low as to fiddle the rules, would they? Its so obvious what has gone on it's undefendable. The Bees are Buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamfj Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Mods please lock this thread, it's run it's course, and that course was Shovlar whinging and moaning and looking for any reason for Poole's crushing defeat other than the Poole team themselves! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
javw Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Fair point Wolfie, enough is enough.Just going around in circles. Either a wind up or someone has got very serious problems! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon G Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Just lock Shovlar's account, make life on here much easier! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Just lock Shovlar's account, make life on here much easier! Really? Because you don't like what I say? Don't you believe in other peoples opinion? Or if someone disagrees with yours just ban them? Coventry fans now trying to be the forum police! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Jasper Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Granted he would have missed a few, but he could easily have ridden more than 12. A Wolves fan posted a list of all the meetings he missed. Quite a few of them are unexplained. You take that as gospel? if thats the case it would go a fair way to explaining your nonsensical ramblings, actually thats point, do you ghostwrite Matt Ford's column? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philfromcov Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Really? Because you don't like what I say? Don't you believe in other peoples opinion? Or if someone disagrees with yours just ban them? Coventry fans now trying to be the forum police! to re phrase footbal chants: Sit down shuit up yoooooooooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuur ssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhuiiiiiiiiiiiiiittttttttttttttttt aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh up the mighty bees! pugwash were pants pugwash will be pants pugwash will always be pants six seasons 1 title not great is it, not like the mighty bees with three Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Some of you are as bad as each other....Coventry didn't break any rules. They won fairly. Can't we just move on from this now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted October 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Post now removed, poster warned. Surely your rant here is against the forum rules. Never heard of attack the post and not the poster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts