Catalan Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 As I said elsewhere depends what mood the co ordinator is in what the rules are for the day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kog Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 Newport put together a winning team within the rules despite having five riders unavailable, they are in with a chance of winning the National League trophy - do you expect them to throw it away ? When the Late Tim Stone put out weak Newport Maverick sides he was slated by everybody for fielding a team full of training school kids, now when Newport want to win they are slated by the likes of you. Theres some just like having a pop no matter what Newport do. Sorry, but the likes of me wonder what the point of having a Number 8 if there appears to be no intention of using him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dickiemint Posted September 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 Sorry, but the likes of me wonder what the point of having a Number 8 if there appears to be no intention of using him? Oh dear an elite league supporter who failed to understand post no 17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brewer Posted September 26, 2010 Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 Seems the rules have changed since the AGM then as only a guest for a number 1 was permitted then and R/R for any of the top five. so are they supposed to turn up with 4 riders, (would probably of still beat weymouth though ) what rules, seems NL dont have any, you didnt jump on this last week when bournemouth used worral and kerr as guests and rye used knight as one instance this year, at the end of the day it gave 2 young british riders without a team a chance to show thereselves and they did, one of which was recently controversially dropped to accomadate another rider outside of the non existent (for NL only) cut off date. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diesel Posted September 26, 2010 Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 Sorry, but the likes of me wonder what the point of having a Number 8 if there appears to be no intention of using him? I ask again, what number 8? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrystalCastles Posted September 26, 2010 Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 Seems the rules have changed since the AGM then as only a guest for a number 1 was permitted then and R/R for any of the top five. clearly we should have gone with r/r for two riders in the top five , oh wait your not allowed to do that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kog Posted September 26, 2010 Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 I ask again, what number 8? Perhaps the one on the latest team declarations? NL Line Ups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diesel Posted September 26, 2010 Report Share Posted September 26, 2010 Who I pointed out hasn't been seen since P&P in March. Ben Reade was used a few times from number 8 and actually did alright, but went to Plymouth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.