pirate paul Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Hopefully you read this forum. Congratulations on being THE most incompetant referee the Elite league has had to endure. So far you are the only person that can get so many decisions so badly wrong, and with the added benefit of Sky slo-mo replays! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCB Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Totally agree. Every decision was wrong. Terrible refereeing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 (edited) I suppose the only saving grace is, that it didn't actually affect the outcome of the meeting....I'm almost embarrassed for him. Edited May 3, 2010 by Jacques Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy robin Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 I suppose the only saving grace is, that it didn't actually affect the outcome of the meeting....I'm almost embarrassed for him. Was this not the same ref who did the play-off final between Wolves & Swindon?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zlata prilba Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 (edited) Is this ref the same bloke that tried his hand as a mechanic few years ago often seen at Reading or in Czecho during the Golden Helmet Edited May 3, 2010 by zlata prilba Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WembleyLion Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Was this not the same ref who did the play-off final between Wolves & Swindon?. Yes and the same one who failed to ensure Swindon v Ipswich got through to heat 12 last month. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Why did he exclude Mrozcka? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedy den boy Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 (edited) Why did he exclude Mrozcka? Think he must have been using bspa super high tec million trillion tracker to the cm telescope technology.Love to see the next match hes in charge of!!!! Edited May 3, 2010 by speedy den boy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Think he must have been using bspa super high tec million trillion tracker to the cm telescope technology.Love to see the next match hes in charge of!!!! He should be sacked, i mean did he ever look at a replay put the lights on pretty instantly each time he excluded someone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason.C Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Jason Doyle's exclusion was ludicrous. A replay of the incident was available to watch, yet the ref chooses to ignore it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate Nick Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Jason Doyle's exclusion was ludicrous. A replay of the incident was available to watch, yet the ref chooses to ignore it. I was in the glass stand watching the Sky replays. Robinson (he doesn't deserve to be called the ref) had the blue light on before Sky had re played the incident. You could clearly see that Hougards dirt deflector had hit Doyles front wheel. I feel that he rushed the decision and then didn't have the balls to admit he was wrong. The man is a disgrace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Jason Doyle's exclusion was ludicrous. A replay of the incident was available to watch, yet the ref chooses to ignore it. I thought King Arturs exclusion even more ridiculous. Never seen anything like it. Totally unwarranted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason.C Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 That too...what happened to the Polish ref who made some absolute howlers in the GP's one year? Can they be investigated if a club puts a complaint in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitram Posted May 3, 2010 Report Share Posted May 3, 2010 Why's it taken everyone so long?,he's been rubbish from day one as a trainee! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob B Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 I thought King Arturs exclusion even more ridiculous. Never seen anything like it. Totally unwarranted. That one went in Pooles favour, both times Mroczka was left behind when stopped ,BV on 5-1 both times, Madsen came in made the gate and Poole got 5-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fourentee Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 Why did he exclude Mrozcka? Because the rider, having been warned for moving at the start, did so again (fractionally) at the restart. I'm not getting into the whole debate about the referee's competence because I was working and only had half an eye on the screen for most of the match. Nor am I going to get pulled into whether Mroczka's second, marginal, twitch should be deemed sufficient to disqualify him, whether referees have latitude in such cases or whether it's an absolute "two moves and he has to go" directive because I don't have access to the ref's rulebook and/or any guidelines that are handed out and so simply don't know. But you asked the question and that's the answer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grachan Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 Mroczka was last out the gate first time round anyway. If he's just left it then there would have been no problem. In fact, the exclusion probably benefitted Poole in the end. Interesting also that Peter Karlsson (I think) was clearly moving at the start of the next race yet it was completely ignored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salty Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 If you watch the 3rd re-run of Heat 12 you will see that Madsen was rolling at the start. Certainly moving a lot more than Artur was the second time. As Grachan says PK rolled from gate 4 in the next heat as well. It is the lack of consistency that is poor. You can also say the same about the decisions in Heat 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fourentee Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 Mroczka was last out the gate first time round anyway. If he's just left it then there would have been no problem. In fact, the exclusion probably benefitted Poole in the end. Interesting also that Peter Karlsson (I think) was clearly moving at the start of the next race yet it was completely ignored. Yes, I thought that at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryn Posted May 4, 2010 Report Share Posted May 4, 2010 I would doubt that any referee would watch TV replays before making any decision during the course of any Sky TV match they are officiating at - afterall they wouldn't be able to consult such replays at any other match would they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.