salty Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 I know its 50. So by your previous quote, he is lucky be there. I refer to your statement regarding 30 GPs. The difference between Rune and Scott is that Rune has not had to rely on the generosity of the authorities to get a GP spot in the past but has got in by qualifying. As regards why it has took Rune so long to win one, I think that is a bit of a surprise. He has been one of the top performers in the Polish and Swedish leagues for years and has put in plenty of good rides in the GP's. Time after time he seemed to cock up at either the gate or by over riding in Semi's, but last season was a bit of a break through when he reached the podium a couple of times and rode his socks off to overcome a poor start to the series and finish in the top 8. Hope he can qualify by right again this year, because with the political rubbish that goes along with the nominations I fear a less worthy rider might get a spot at his expense. For example this ridiculous notion that the Brits must have 2 riders in the series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucifer sam Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 Sub No fully agree with you ..Gollob should have gone... jb JB - sorry, I disagree. The referee was correct in excluding Jonsson. Gollob did nothing wrong. All the best Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Authorised Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 (edited) Dear me, your not awfully clever, are you? The point is only: your quote regarding 30 GPs, is RUBBISH. Your quotes about Nicholls not being near winning is RUBBISH. Best finish 2nd for Nicholls, 3rd for Holta prior to last night. This is nothing to do with 'lets compare Holta and Nicholls', more to do with your 'lucky to get 30 GPs if he wasn't British', I am picking up on this point, much to your obvious discomfort! Whatever way you want to twist, and turn, you are wrong, yet you cannot just hold your hands up. Its funny. I am going to leave it here, as the quotes tell the full story. You petty little hatred towards one rider is pathetic, and your quote are very wrong. Its a shame, because mostly you have good value with opinions, but this time you are wrong, and its clouding your better sense of making judgements. Edited May 25, 2008 by Authorised Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 I think everyone knows why you dont like me and why you argue against me...and that is because i am a fan of the multiple British Champion Scott Nicholls......If you detest him so much why did both you and schumi want an interview with him on the WWOS To provide information for the people that visit our little site. We have a fair few Coventry supporters and many who admire the former British champion. And I don't detest him. I just don't agree with those who claim that he's the greatest thing since the microchip. If people were realistic, it wouldn't be a problem. But they aren't, are they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 The point is only: your quote regarding 30 GPs, is RUBBISH. How is it? If he'd been thrown out at the same time as Holta, how many GPs would he have completed? I guess maybe 8 missed in 2005, 8 missed in 2006, 10 missed in 2007 and 3 missed so far in 2008. Because, facing facts, he isn't likely to qualify via the qualifiers, is he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JIROUT Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 Sub Can you show me a quote where i have said he is the best thing since sliced bread. If you were to ask me i would say he has been very disappointing this year...But ever the optimist as a Brit i will still hope he comes good......and believe he will....... However the reason i argue with you is that i do not agree with you being disrespectful to him...or in actual fact.to any..rider...fan...or member of this forum ...which you are every day.....I find it distasteful and unneccessary....and quite frankly if you cannot win an argument without insulting someone i find that pretty poor.......You are a clever guy...you dont need the insults to win an argument....but its like you cant help yourself and you need to think of yourself as upper class as opposed to the other people who use this forum......Im sure a lot of people find this abrasive behaviour funny...but trust me there is nothing clever in it jb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Schumi Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 (edited) You have been waiting for that have you not........My computer seems to be playing up though cos i cannot find your highlighting of all the insults Sub has thrown out... You told me you "have tried to refrain from insults". If you can't do that then you can't complain if someone else does it. I think everyone knows why you dont like me and why you argue against me...and that is because i am a fan of the multiple British Champion Scott Nicholls......If you detest him so much why did both you and schumi want an interview with him on the WWOS I can answer that, seeing as it was me who asked. I thought he'd make an interesting subject, and he was topical at the time. And I had nothing against him, as you well know. I've even posted a thread praising him recently. Edited May 25, 2008 by Schumi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JIROUT Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 Schumi Did you email Scott then jb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sir Lunchalot Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 However the reason i argue with you is that i do not agree with you being disrespectful to him...or in actual fact.to any..rider...fan...or member of this forum ...which you are every day.....I find it distasteful and unneccessary....and quite frankly if you cannot win an argument without insulting someone i find that pretty poor.......You are a clever guy...you dont need the insults to win an argument....but its like you cant help yourself and you need to think of yourself as upper class as opposed to the other people who use this forum......Im sure a lot of people find this abrasive behaviour funny...but trust me there is nothing clever in it jb I'm a bit worried about Sub to be honest jb. he never used to be quite so personal but lately it seems like every argument needs some assistance along the way with a personal insult or two thrown in for good measure. Hopefully it's just a "David Koresh" phase he is going through and normal service will be resumed soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxer123 Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 This tread is so entertaining Unlike the GP which due to track conditions was very hard work. I think Tony Steel is a decent enough referee and got his decsions right. He doesn't twist and turn like a twisty turny thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JIROUT Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 Sir Lunchalot Thats exactly what i am getting up....He has some great points about speedway and indeed life and me and him have locked horns on numerous occassions but recently every argument has been used with insults to people...which is not right jb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goosebump Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 thought the gp was pretty good. some cracking races. sadly just as many falls though. gutting to see iversen injured, i feel hes made a good impression on the series so far as well as upping his game in the leagues. lindgren was brilliant last night. people who moan at pearson have many valid points but generally i like him, purely because of his enthusiasiam etc. millard is a totally different matter though - hes shocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 Hello from the states Only being able so far to see the main. I dont get why people are questioning the power from Rune. If you watch, you can clearly see no wheel spin on his tire. He is clearly hooked up on the outside. Pederson gets great start but clearly is spinning in the water down the inside coming out of first turn. Lindgren has rut problems half way through first turn and then has to back out of it down the back straight away. Crump looks very weary the entire race. Leg is down the entire straightaway end of first lap. From my point of view was a great race on a real bad track. You guys are so lucky being able to see these races. The US once again drops the ball broadcasting these events. But will be in Cardiff for my first trip to England. As a retired rider I cant wait. P.S. anyone have a link to see the AJ crash? there might be a clip of it on the skysports website, not too sure though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 millard is a totally different matter though - hes shocking. I don't think he's ever called the wrong winner of a Grand Prix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxer123 Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 thought the gp was pretty good. some cracking races. sadly just as many falls though. gutting to see iversen injured, i feel hes made a good impression on the series so far as well as upping his game in the leagues. lindgren was brilliant last night. people who moan at pearson have many valid points but generally i like him, purely because of his enthusiasiam etc. millard is a totally different matter though - hes shocking. I like them both , I think they do an ok job. Of the two I perfer Mr Millard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashie Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 How anyone can say Pearson is ok to commentate on Speedway after not even knowing who wins a GP is beyond me. Anyway, back to this GP. Lets be honest, how many of you turned off? Very few of us! This was the most entertaining GP since Cardiff last year, you could not take your eyes off for a minute because the track, shocking as it was, did create for entertaining and exciting action. Sadly it was entertaining for the wrong reasons (i.e. injured riders). Lets be frank about this, the first few heats prove my theory, had those ruts not developed this would have been another boring, first out of the gate, follow the leader procession of a GP. Back to the next GP, how can we create an entertaining GP? Is it the poor slick tracks, or is it the fact the bikes are so fast that given a few bike lengths head start at the first bend, they are so fast and reliable that you can't have good racing? I don't know, I need a rider to answer that question. However, I do want to say that entertaining as Saturday was, I would never want any rider to be injured and we must never see tracks like that again at the top level of the sport, well any level for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxer123 Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 How anyone can say Pearson is ok to commentate on Speedway after not even knowing who wins a GP is beyond me. Anyway, back to this GP. Lets be honest, how many of you turned off? Very few of us! This was the most entertaining GP since Cardiff last year, you could not take your eyes off for a minute because the track, shocking as it was, did create for entertaining and exciting action. Sadly it was entertaining for the wrong reasons (i.e. injured riders). Lets be frank about this, the first few heats prove my theory, had those ruts not developed this would have been another boring, first out of the gate, follow the leader procession of a GP. Back to the next GP, how can we create an entertaining GP? Is it the poor slick tracks, or is it the fact the bikes are so fast that given a few bike lengths head start at the first bend, they are so fast and reliable that you can't have good racing? I don't know, I need a rider to answer that question. However, I do want to say that entertaining as Saturday was, I would never want any rider to be injured and we must never see tracks like that again at the top level of the sport, well any level for that. Well I like him , I didnt need to be told who won . I knew. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 I didnt need to be told who won . I knew. Yes, but the commentator and so-called expert should know also, otherwise what is the point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashie Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 I didnt need to be told who won . I knew. Well bully for you, I also thought I knew, but must admit PPP started clouding my judgement and I had no idea so had to come on here to check in case of some daft new rule change. The difference is I am allowed to not know, I am not paid to provide factually correct commentary to the masses, PPP is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddas69 Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Wouldnt disagree with any of the comments about Gollob,what was even more dis-tasteful was when Dryml and Tomicek crashed Gollob parked the bike in middle of the track waving at the referee when anyone could see that the crash wasnt the fault of the rides. U got that one utterly wrong. He was waving at the referee because of the state of the track once again had caused someone to fall, NOT because he was angry that the heat was stopped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.