ILoveAJ Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 I'm jealous of a lot of people, I don't go and push them over <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You could see in Scott's eyes that he didn't like having the limelight taken away from him... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sicknote Posted October 13, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 But what about Harris' move on Scott prior to that? very ala Pedersen/Hancock with a gnats whisker to spare between his back wheel and Scott's front wheel. But guess you will get the Nicholls fans and the Harris fans on here bickering it out! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What about Harris's move, hard YES but FAIR, what you mention is the gnats whisker, wasn't quite that much between Nicholls and Bomber was there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabbit Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 I feel for poor old Subedei...finally Nicholls has qualified by right, however controversially. No more 'beggar' quotes - will that title transfer to Bomber now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hobgoblin Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 doesnt matter what bomber did tonight, surely the race off should of been holta and scott, how can someone who wins a gp have to fight for top 8 place. when you are level for the semis in a gp he done on heat wins so, cardiff should of been enough for harris not to be in race off. IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
home straight Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 I feel for poor old Subedei...finally Nicholls has qualified by right, however controversially. No more 'beggar' quotes - will that title transfer to Bomber now? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't feel sorry for him at all, I think he's been proved correct. If it wasn't for a truly shocking decision from the spineless ref Nicholls would have failed to qualify. Again. We all saw tonight that when it came down to it Nicholls wasn't good enough and had to resort to a kind of banger racing/speedway hybrid to stand a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Addison Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Absoloutly no doubt whatsoever Nicholls blatently stuck Bomber in the fence, he even looked at him before he done it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Correct. Snidey move from a snidey bloke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedwayKid Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 (edited) Scotty has been Jealous of Harris ever since Harris won the Cardiff GP, Scotty has had 2 years in GP's? and has never won a GP. Harris comes in and wins a GP and at Cardiff you could see Scotty didn't like it. Should off been EX but hey i'm not the ref. Edited October 13, 2007 by speedwayKid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Addison Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 (edited) You could see in Scott's eyes that he didn't like having the limelight taken away from him... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Limelight for WHAT ? The blonde pit person ??? He's nothing but a choker. Edited October 13, 2007 by Philip Addison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aries Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Im sure hes not LW But what changes , he seems to have major problems whenever any of his team member becomes more popular than him , as we know from his time at Ipswich. Terrible decision BTW , should have been awarded , Holta , Harris , Nicholls <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Too true Boxer. Thought he was the big cheese at Foxhall and got pi$$ed off when the fans votes Hans rider of the year and took him to their hearts I do still like Scott as a rider though, great to watch and damn good despite what some will say. Very naughty tonight though i must admit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
back straight bee Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 (edited) fact scott should have been excluded.the referee chose to ignore it.but hey stop sticking the knife into scott it was pure racing nothing malicious.felt really sorry for bomber.a wildcard is a cert and this incident will make bomber more determined next year. did you notice scott coming out of bombers pits after the race.good luck scott and bomber.the important thing is that they will both be in 2008 series. Edited October 13, 2007 by back straight bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don'sfreelancerider Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Scotty should of been out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tricky dicky Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Correct. Snidey move from a snidey bloke. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Says he from behind his keyboard !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 You've gotta get out more... Ref could've called it either way, Scott did what he felt he had to and got away with it. That's speedway racing...ask Gollob, ask Nicki etc <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Absolutely Steve.This isn't team riding it's an individual(though at times you wonder ).A racing incident & that's all,pity for Bomber but hey he'll be in again next year better & stronger.If anything Scott taught him a lesson in how you need to be when the chips are down & Chris will learn from it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveAJ Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Absolutely Steve.This isn't team riding it's an individual(though at times you wonder ).A racing incident & that's all,pity for Bomber but hey he'll be in again next year better & stronger.If anything Scott taught him a lesson in how you need to be when the chips are down & Chris will learn from it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ya when the chips are down just stuff him in the fence..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 I feel for poor old Subedei...finally Nicholls has qualified by right, however controversially. No more 'beggar' quotes - will that title transfer to Bomber now? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No Rabs that's now Jarek's new nickname Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 What I don't "get" about the whole race-off situation is why Sky believed Harris should have first choice. They kept saying he'd been better than the other two. But, if he had, he wouldn't have been in the race-off, would he? They all scored 91 points, so how the hell did Harris have a better season than the other two? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 No Rabs that's now Jarek's new nickname <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Or Chris Harris'. I don't think Hampel deserves a nomination - he's had chances before and not produced the goods. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Addison Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 (edited) Says he from behind his keyboard !! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well i dont HIDE BEHIND A FALSE NAME LIKE TRICKY DICKY HA HA HA HA I give my opinions and if you don't like em, tough for you pal. Edited October 13, 2007 by Philip Addison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
London Witch Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Im sure hes not LW But what changes , he seems to have major problems whenever any of his team member becomes more popular than him , as we know from his time at Ipswich. Terrible decision BTW , should have been awarded , Holta , Harris , Nicholls <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Tut-tut Boxer, time to move on! I watched the race as a bit of a neutral. None of the three are particular favourites of mine but I would have liked the Brits to go through. So in my opinion with no bias, I thought Scott was very harsh and lucky not to be excluded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatface Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 We can only assume you know Scott Nicholls well to make those sort of observations. I assume you do Phillip? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.