adelaide juniors Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 Some of you people that post on here really need to have a good look at yourselfs. Fair enough your entitled to an opinion, but to slag off riders weight and sling other rubbish at them is not on. I would like to know how many of you have actually achieved anything of note in your lifes. And dont go on about the crap, we pay our money so are entitled to an opinion, thats bulldust, theres no body more dissapointed when they dont ride well than the riders, and they dont need your constant slagging. Cheesed Off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeverEverWrong Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 Read through some of the previous posts, and I think that Scott will finish in the top eight this year, as I also think Gollob will as well. I have to say that both have something in common, and that is this year they have both been inconsistent, Gollob on his day is the most exciting and skillful rider, but his inconsistency lets him down, that is why he has never and will never win the title. I think that Scott will never win the title, but if you put only the riders that could possible win the title in the Grand Prix you would be left with only about 3 or 4 riders. I also think that Scott might now have live with the fact that he is not going to be the Brits number 1 rider. I think that Chris Harris has stole his mantle there, Chris for me is like Chris Louis says not just a racer, but is very intelligent, and I think that as he learns more he will be up there challenging. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think your pushing it with that statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazzman Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 A rider of rare and unmatched genius, compared to the obvious limitations of the former British champion. On a fair track, Gollob will always cruelly expose the limitations of such lesser riders. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But in the cold light of day, there is only a 6 points difference between a genius and a beggar. I think your pushing it with that statement. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> His Heat 8 gate where he went to Stockholm and back would prove you wrong but his naivety in letting Holta beat him for a point meant no semi-spot and points lost in the battle of the Top 8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 (edited) Make your mind up, will you. Say whether you have integrity or don't mind the corruption that sees this serial failure beg his way into the series year after year after year. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Scotty is now in equal 8th place,FACT,i don't call that begging. As Hazzman has said only 6pts between him & Gollob you're genius,which i actually do not ?.October 13 will reveal all Edited August 13, 2007 by colincooke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 Scotty is now in equal 8th place,FACT,i don't call that begging. As Hazzman has said only 6pts between him & Gollob you're genius,which i actually do not ?.October 13 will reveal all <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Level with Hampel who has missed a round and Jagus who missed two rides after Nicki P clattered into him when he was flying in Eskilstuna. True, only six points, but a yawning chasm between the two when it comes to talent and ability - Gollob has talent and ability to squander, the former British champion is bankrupt by comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzybird Posted August 13, 2007 Report Share Posted August 13, 2007 Nicholls neither has the temprament or brains to go far in the sport. He's also to fat, his bikes literally groan under the weight they have to carry. Lose the weight, lose the personal problems, lose the attitude and he might get some where. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> OMG did you just say that out loud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adelaide juniors Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Nicholls neither has the temprament or brains to go far in the sport. He's also to fat, his bikes literally groan under the weight they have to carry. Lose the weight, lose the personal problems, lose the attitude and he might get some where. OMG did you just say that out loud Yes he did, what a tool, bet hes been a loser all his life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB252 Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Interesting debate as ever on these Scotty threads whilst the school holidays are on! Somehow Tomasz Gollob (the modern day Finn Jensen!) seems to have been dragged into it? Maybe a gulf in talent exists, but it's always good to watch a rider who gives 110% regardless of conditions like 4X Former British Champion Scott, rather than someone who can only be arsed when he's got out of the right side of bed!! Down with Gollob, and Poles in general, I say! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver Bee Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Level with Hampel who has missed a round <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Scott missed a round last year at his best track in the GP series, you said that made no difference and he was still a failiure for not making the top 8. It's clearly no excuse not being in the top 8 after missing a round through injury, is it? Where did Hans finish last year after missing 4 rounds? Oh yeah, in the top 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Scott missed a round last year at his best track in the GP series, you said that made no difference and he was still a failiure for not making the top 8. It's clearly no excuse not being in the top 8 after missing a round through injury, is it? Where did Hans finish last year after missing 4 rounds? Oh yeah, in the top 6 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks SB, at last someone is backing me up against that serial scotty hater Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Scott missed a round last year at his best track in the GP series, you said that made no difference and he was still a failiure for not making the top 8. It's clearly no excuse not being in the top 8 after missing a round through injury, is it? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The former British champion wasn't level with Hampel though, was he? No, he wasn't and that makes all the difference in the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemini Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 I'd back you up as well C.C., but I don't bother reading his posts any more as I got cheesed off with the same things being said over and over again. Tedious and boring. The ignore list comes in very handy sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 I'd back you up as well C.C., but I don't bother reading his posts any more as I got cheesed off with the same things being said over and over again. Tedious and boring. The ignore list comes in very handy sometimes. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Quite agree Gemini, i'm bored with him 2. Oh well i suppose in a desolate place likeMongolia he needs something 2 do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Turner Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 The former British champion wasn't level with Hampel though, was he? No, he wasn't and that makes all the difference in the world. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Correct, Scott was actually 4 places AHEAD of Hampel last year, in 6th place overall, when he was injured and forced to miss his favourite GP. Had Scott scored his usual Prague total in that meeting then he would have finished in the Top 8 And yet another sensible discussion turns into a slag off Subedei thread. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actually, it was a positive appreciation thread turned into a "slag off Nicholls thread" by Vincent Vega, Hansfan and one or two others may have joined-in... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Correct, Scott was actually 4 places AHEAD of Hampel last year, in 6th place overall, when he was injured and forced to miss his favourite GP. Had Scott scored his usual Prague total in that meeting then he would have finished in the Top 8 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But he didn't, did he? No, he finished, once again, outside the top eight, but swallowed his brave words of earlier in the season and begged for his place. And he's outside the top eight again, in spite of Hampel having missed a round. His favourite GP and all he could manage this season was fourth. That's truly shocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Turner Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 His favourite GP and all he could manage this season was fourth. That's truly shocking. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm afraid it takes more than that to shock me...you must be a sensitive soul in your old age Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colincooke Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Correct, Scott was actually 4 places AHEAD of Hampel last year, in 6th place overall, when he was injured and forced to miss his favourite GP. Had Scott scored his usual Prague total in that meeting then he would have finished in the Top 8 Actually, it was a positive appreciation thread turned into a "slag off Nicholls thread" by Vincent Vega, Hansfan and one or two others may have joined-in... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well done ST, i'll let you off 4 beating me 2 that 1 then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 I'm afraid it takes more than that to shock me...you must be a sensitive soul in your old age <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, I just have higher standards than the terminally deluded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Turner Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Fair enough Any chance that the terminally deluded can be left alone now, to enjoy their equally low standard Scott Nicholls ? Nah, forget that...I know what the answer will be... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted August 14, 2007 Report Share Posted August 14, 2007 Fair enough Any chance that the terminally deluded can be left alone now, to enjoy their equally low standard Scott Nicholls ? Nah, forget that...I know what the answer will be... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The answer will be certainly, as long as everyone accepts that the former British champion is of a low standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.