Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Peter Craven Book


Recommended Posts

I've now had a chance to compare notes with Merlin and Mickthemonarch on the Monarchs Chat Board about this.

 

Merlin is fairly sure the race went off scratch. Mick is absolutely adamant that it did. All three of us were there (unknown to each other at that time.) We can all also remember the crowd demanding that the race be run off scratch, because we all thought that George had a chance of beating Peter.

 

Whatever anyone else tells you, Dick, just remember they're arguing with a combined speedway experience in excess of 120 years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

The book seems to affirm that PC did start with a 20yd handicap on that fateful night...

I was there and can recall this vividly - it was the saddest night I ever experienced at a speedway track.

 

Peter started each of his first three races from a 20-yard handicap, and was due to do so in his last race. However, everyone in the stadium, it seemed, wanted to see local hero George Hunter in a straight head-to-head with Peter. It was an inter-league challenge match, and there was nothing at stake other than individual pride. It was therefore agreed that Peter would start from scratch, alongside George.

 

The rest, sadly, is history...

I was also at Old Meadowbank on that fateful Friday night when Peter Craven went through the saftey fence. Although time dulls the memory I'm pretty sure you're right Ian that, following requests from the spectators, Peter Craven started that heat off scratch. It was such a thrill to see George Hunter scorch into the lead from the tapes because we knew we were in for a great race. As you say, the rest, unfortunately, is history. Strange that it has been suggested that George Hunter fell on the last lap. I recollect the accident occurring on the first bend of the second lap when George's bike seized solid. I also don't recollect George actually falling although that is irrelevant as Peter Craven was forced to take evasive action to avoid rider and machine. He swerved to the outside, lost control and went through the safety fence head first with such force that his crash helmet was a complete write off. We didn't realise then just how badly Peter was injured and were absolutely stunned to learn a few days later that he had lost his life.

 

Sometime later that same season Edinburgh went to Belle Vue in a memorial match for Peter Craven and George Hunter rode that night and top scored for the Monarchs who, needless to say, were well beaten (52-26?) by the Aces.

 

There is a plaque inside the Meadowbank Sports Centre dedicated to Peter Craven which can be seen just to the right of the main entrance to the facility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure you're right Ian that, following requests from the spectators, Peter Craven started that heat off scratch.

First of all, I don't wish to get involed in any kind of arguement here. I wasn't born until 1976, but I have Peter Craven's book and it differs to what is being said in this thread. As a result, I am confused. A piece in the book says "I then made a tragic mistake, reflected Hoskins. I asked Peter in the pits, if he would care to start 20 yards behind the others in his final heat of the match. As there was nothing at stake, he sportingly agreed."

 

Strange that it has been suggested that George Hunter fell on the last lap. I recollect the accident occurring on the first bend of the second lap when George's bike seized solid. I also don't recollect George actually falling although that is irrelevant as Peter Craven was forced to take evasive action to avoid rider and machine.

According to the book, it happened on the final lap. Here is a piece from it - "....he soon began to close in on Hunter, and the crowd roared their encouragement to their Scottish star as the spectacular Belle Vue superstar got closer and closer with each turn. Then as the pair entered the final lap, Craven was very close behind....". It goes on "....But he over-slid on the banked track and fell. Craven immediately took avoidance action and swerved to avoid him, but he was too close and his front wheel struck the back wheel of his fallen competitor...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter, it wasn't a case of him being asked to start 20 yards behind in his last race. Remember that we are talking about 1963, when the top five in the National League (Craven, Briggs, Moore, Fundin and Knutsson) were all required to start 20 yards back in each and ever league match. He had done so in each of his previous races.

 

It stands to reason that the only change that could have been made would have been for him to start from scratch, as the crowd wanted, and that's exactly what he did.

 

Who would have won the race had the tragedy not occurred? I don't know. Both riders were flying - George was a white-liner, so Peter looked faster. Meadowbank was far from being a one-line track. After 40 years of seeing that race in my mind over and over again I still wouldn't put money on the outcome. Were it not for the outcome people would certainly still talk about this race as one of the greatest ever, even without a pass having taken place.

 

Incidentally, at that time I had the ridiculous notion that I fancied becoming a lawyer (working class kid - no chance!) I therefore went along to the subsequent court inquest into Peter's death some months later. A very emotional George Hunter gave evidence, as did Willie Templeton, who from behind them probably had the best view in the stadium. Although this topic certainly isn't one appropriate for humour, I still smile when I recall Willie trying to explain to the court his evidence that "I laid the bike doon tae avoid them!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dick, I certainly did not intend to be patronising toward anyone, but the facts are these.

 

Three life-long supporters who were actually there on the night believe that Peter started off scratch. One of them, an accredited expert on the sport, uses the word "definitely".

 

At the inquest, William Ewart Templeton gave evidence that he was in the race and had to lay his bike down to avoid George and Peter. (I only know his middle name from the inquest, by the way). Are we suggesting Willie obstructed the course of justice when he knew there were 8000 witnesses present?

 

The only possible reasons I can give for Ian Hoskins being wrong about this is that he is no longer a young man - nor am I, but I'm a good bit younger than he is! His account of Peter's pass ofd the other two riders is pure Hoskins. "He soon began to close in on Hunter, and the crowd roared their encouragement to their Scottish star as the spectacular Belle Vue superstar got closer and closer with each turn...."

 

This is a debate which could rumble on forever, and one which I have always assumed to be unprovable either way. However, it may be that there is a guaranteed way to resolve it. I imagine that inquest records from the early sixties are still available and are a matter of public record - would you accept the transcript as conclusive evidence of what actually happened that Friday night?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only possible reasons I can give for Ian Hoskins being wrong about this is that he is no longer a young man - nor am I, but I'm a good bit younger than he is! His account of Peter's pass ofd the other two riders is pure Hoskins. "He soon began to close in on Hunter, and the crowd roared their encouragement to their Scottish star as the spectacular Belle Vue superstar got closer and closer with each turn...."

Pure Hoskins? He didn't quote that. The book states: "Hunter was in front coming out of the first bend, while Peter began negotiating his way through the pack - effortlessly passing his partner Powell and the other Monarchs rider Dudley McKean - replacing Willie Templeton." (The quote is not someone's opinion, as it's not in italics in the book).

 

Are you seriously suggesting Craven was outgated by McKean and Powell, as well as Hunter?

 

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you. I wasn't there, so it would be foolish of me to say who is right and who is wrong. I'm just taking bits from the book that differ from what you say.

 

Like you say, this could go on forever, but I think I've said enough. One thing that everyone seems agree on is that it was an accident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter, I certainly did not suggest that Peter had to pass anyone before he started to chase George. That appears to be what the book says, though. I can promise you that nobody in the stadium that night was watching anyone other than George and Peter. I doubt whether he had to pass either of the other two.

 

As for DD's question "Have you read the book?", the answer is that I have not. However, I did see the race, which I suspect puts me at an advantage over the book's author (whoever he was).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quote in the book taken from an interview with George Hunter in 1998 published in 5-1 magazine seems to add weight to Ian's argument. George says "if only Peter had beaten me out of the gate that night" That would only be possible if he was actually lined up at the gate with Hunter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting complicated, isn't it?

 

I know Ian Hoskins was there - I saw him. As for my description of some of the text quoted from the book as "pure Hoskins", it appears to be very much in his style. I would not be surprised to learn that he had written it. Maybe he did.

 

The number of long-term fans who were there that night and share my recollection has now risen to six. Reluctant though I am to in any way diminish people's memories of Peter Craven, the fact is that he started from scratch in his last race. Did he have to overtake two other riders to get into a position to challenge George Hunter? Not to my recollection. George's engine seized on the first bend of the third lap. Some witnesses say he stayed on and did not fall. I honestly can't remember - I was willing Peter Craven to get up and walk away, as you do, despite knowing that really wasn't going to happen.

 

Whatever books written years later, by people who may or may not have been there, may or may not say, the publication I do recall was the Speedway Star headline following Peter's death. "The King Is Dead". That just about summed up how we all felt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not all that complicated, Dick.

 

I wasn't quoting the book. I was quoting what Peter says are quotes from the book (and I've no doubt they are.) I think if you look back to his posting dated 14th January you will see the source.

 

Incidentally, if you are implying that I'm either lying or making this up then I'd be pleased to hear what you think the motive is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a fabulous web site Dick Dastardly. I'm very impressed and pleased to see such a memorial to a rider who was not just a world champion but a great entertainer. The picture in the gallery with George Hunter is rather poignant. I had forgotten just how young George was at the time.

 

I don't wish to prolong the discussion on the matter but I have spoken to two friends of mine both of whom were speedway riders at that time and both of whom were at the match that night. One is almost an authority on what happened and was standing only a few yards from where the accident occurred (Old Meadowbank did not have a dog track between the crowd and the track - indeed you could virtually lean over the fence and touch the riders if they came close enough!). He confirmed that Peter Craven, following a bit of rabble rousing by Ian Hoskins with the crowd, did start that fateful heat off scratch. The crash occurred on the first bend of lap three when George Hunter's bike seized solid. George did not actually fall off but Peter, who was so close behind and had been tailing George since they left the gate, had to take evasive action immediately with the tragic result that is now part of speedway history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I was at this meeting, age 14 and stood right at the starting gate (I was one of the first through the turnstyles having queued from 5.30pm).

 

Merlin's account is accurate.

 

Peter Craven did start off scratch.

 

Willie Templeton took part in the original start, but was unfit for the re-run(believe he fainted) and was replaced by reserve Dudley McKean. Norman Nevitt replaced Peter Craven.

 

I have written notes in my programme at the time, which confirm this.

 

If DD wishes to accept fiction, that is his prerogative, but please do not patronise those who were there, regarding "fading memories" :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In reply to Peters, are you suggesting Peter Craven was outgated by 2 lower order riders, it does not have to be the case, it makes sense if you think Craven had started 15 metres back that he had to pass the other 2 riders to be in 2nd place. It could be that he simply outgated the two lower order riders, from the normal start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Did this little disagreement ever get resolved, whether Peter was handicapped or off the gate?

At the time this discussion was going on I couldn't find the booklet called "Peter Craven. Tribute to a great little Champion" which cost me all of two shillings back in the 1960's.

In here John Gibson says he spoke to Peter in the pits before his final fateful race.

I asked if he would follow his normal practice in National League matches and start off a 20 yard handicap in his next race with Billy Powell and Monarchs George Hunter and Willie Templeton. Peter replied "The way these boys have been going tonight I honestly doubt if I could start 20 yards behind and have any chance of beating them, but if the fans want it that way it suits me..." The fans didn't want it that way, so the seemingly unbeatable Craven was off scratch with the other three riders. The race, which normally takes just under 70 seconds was cut short before it was half over and resulted in the first speedway fatality in Scotland since the war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The vivid report by the visitor to your website, Dick Dastardly brought as much of the race back to me as my memory allows. I felt a chill reading it again - it goes to show, I guess, how we forget these things over time.

 

It's only fitting that the plaque in honour of Peter Craven remains to this day just inside the entrance hall to New Meadowbank stadium and, together, with your website provides some tangible memory of that terrible time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it certainly looks like this is settled once and for all. I'm grateful to everone who contributed to this thread. John Gibson, by the way, was the Edinburgh Evening News reporter who covered all of the meetings at Meadowbank, and also in the Speedway Star under the name of "Jock Anderson".

 

Dick Distardly should take some considerable comfort from the fact that, as everone knows, Peter was doing what he did best - lining himself up for an attempt at a spectacular overtake - when the tragedy happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incidentally, at that time I had the ridiculous notion that I fancied becoming a lawyer (working class kid - no chance!) I therefore went along to the subsequent court inquest into Peter's death some months later.

Ian, I have been asked by Jim Henry, editor of Speedway Researcher and Scottish Speedway Historian if you have the official Sherrif Court records of the inquest as they no longer exist and he is researching in to the events of that night.

 

Incidentally, he was also there and agrees that Peter Craven started off scratch.

Edited by norbold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incidentally, at that time I had the ridiculous notion that I fancied becoming a lawyer (working class kid - no chance!) I therefore went along to the subsequent court inquest into Peter's death some months later.

Ian, I have been asked by Jim Henry, editor of Speedway Researcher and Scottish Speedway Historian if you have the official Sherrif Court records of the inquest as they no longer exist and he is researching in to the events of that night.

 

Incidentally, he was also there and agrees that Peter Craven started off scratch.

Sorry, Norbold, but I did have a search for these without success. I guess they were destroyed years ago, but who knows.

 

As I mentioned earlier, however, I did attend the inquest all those years ago. I expect to be at Armadale early this year and I'll try to contact Jim Henry then with a view to telling him what I can remember.

 

This has beeen a really interesting thread. Just such a shame it has to be about an awful tragedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy