xDx Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 C'monnnnnnnnn Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted June 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Nicholls unfortunate that the race wasn't stopped. Crump very hard on Hampel, but, in fairness, Hampel did run too wide on the 3rd and 4th bends. My over-riding opinion is that, with this track surface, it's a lottery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezekiel Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Agreed <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Â Very similar to what Pedersen would've done and has done though. So is he a dirty rider too then?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superjoe Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Yes I support Poole the team not Sullivan the Australian. I support the Brits over him any day of the week. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Â but you support T Rick over all others? Â not a poole rider or a brit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Hampel did go wide agree but Crump didn't give him any room and it was lucky Hampel stayed on or Crump would have been out. Bit of dirty riding from a frantic Crump. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subedei Posted June 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Would the rear wheels of the bikes not just spin when they went over the recumbent "steel" motocross starts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 (edited) but you support T Rick over all others? not a poole rider or a brit <{POST_SNAPBACK}>  Been a fan of TRick since 93 when I saw him win at Voyens ( I was there), and won't change now, even if he rode for BV, god forbid. Edited June 25, 2005 by Steve Shovlar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyM Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 No doubt that the Cardiff ref would have excluded him for sneezing, where this one is letting much harder moves go, and not just Crumpie's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pirate paul Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Just watched the replays, why the hell did Scotty get up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyM Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Not Scotty's night again. You wonder whether he's really got the temperament to score consistently at this level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimbledonwomble Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Would the rear wheels of the bikes not just spin when they went over the recumbent "steel" motocross starts? Â Sorry Subie baby but the engine would hardly clear the bar let alone the back wheel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReadingRacer05 Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Just watched the replays, why the hell did Scotty get up? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Because hes being sportsmanship Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyM Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Sorry Subie baby but the engine would hardly clear the bar let alone the back wheel. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I was only floating an idea about the principle of a gate that goes down and vanishes into the track, not proposing it as a solution!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richtea Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Is Ermolenko a bit simple? <{POST_SNAPBACK}>  No I would say he is very simple. Note his comments on the Hancock Crump incident - complete inconsistency and biased decison making  dirty crump. <{POST_SNAPBACK}>  I hate to say it but I agree however Crump can do no wrong in the eyes of Sky therefore barely a comment made. Reminded me of the move that Nicki made on Hancock which saw Nicki villified by 25 pages of posting on here and Sky going on about it still to this day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyM Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 No I would say he is very simple. Note his comments on the Hancock Crump incident - complete inconsistency and biased decison making <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But no simpler than Tatum, Havelock, Sophie, or indeed any other member of the commentary team! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ezekiel Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 After a really slow start Hans surely has done enough to get into the semi-finals... Â Go Hans!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Shovlar Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Super Tony back on song and smoooking! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
home straight Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 But no simpler than Tatum, Havelock, Sophie, or indeed any other member of the commentary team! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Â Andy, if you are trying to tell us you watch sophie for her intellect, then I'm afraid I may have to call you a liar! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stressed Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 We're cooking towards the business end now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyM Posted June 25, 2005 Report Share Posted June 25, 2005 Andy, if you are trying to tell us you watch sophie for her intellect, then I'm afraid I may have to call you a liar! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I try not to watch her at all if I can avoid it, or only with the sound turned down! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.